Which you can acknowledge is a bit different from the statement of maintaining the universe, yes? I just think we should be careful with the words we use.
… I've already elaborated on this point in particular. You can go back in the thread if you need a refresher. This is elaborated upon in my cosmology blog too...
I think it is weird that you are suddenly suggesting I'm not careful with language
after the main discussion we had on cosmology. Especially after recently misinterpreting what I said about the Le'garde + Rot thing. The post you took it from prefaced the response with:
"The conflict is that he is
already dead in all the S rank endings, and doesn't seem resurected in 2."
I provided two simple arguments
against resurrection in what you quoted saying I assumed he was resurrected as well: Him not initially having his D'arce S ending appearance, and him not initially having the rotted appearance. I was pretty clear with saying
and arguing that I didn't think he was resurrected, yet you claimed I
was assuming he was resurrected. Tbh I find it hard to believe you seriously found my explicit opinion and those two arguments vague or unclear enough to claim I was saying and arguing the opposite.
This, and you suggesting I'm being uncareful with language when I agree on the
why when it comes to the New Gods guiding humanity without loading up the agreement with all the stuff I've said earlier makes me worry you're not engaging in good faith...