- 26,160
- 3,653
Previous thread.
We can't scale ot religions for tier, and Matt argues that "the in-series explanation for Essence isn't necessarily 1-A."
I agree with both to an extent. Though Esseence is still arguable, which is why this thread is a thing.
The arguments right now are:
For at least 1-B: Space is made out of "countless threads", and adding a thread to a circle made a circle into a sphere. Length, Height and Breath are all said to be a portion of what Space represents, and just few of its countless parts/forms.
For 1-A: The above mentioned space is "still under the Vast Expanse which is below Essence which is again under Daosource(step 4) which is again infinitely less domineering that Unknown Realms"
Against 1-B: Matt claims it's a stretch, but didn't seem to have gone into reasoning in depth yet.
Against 1-A: 1-B not being a thing makes 1-A impossible, so any argument against 1-B is against 1-A. As Quas said, trancsending 1-B could simply be a higher level of 1-B, and would need either transcending High 1-B or true platonic concepts to be proved 1-A.
We can't scale ot religions for tier, and Matt argues that "the in-series explanation for Essence isn't necessarily 1-A."
I agree with both to an extent. Though Esseence is still arguable, which is why this thread is a thing.
The arguments right now are:
For at least 1-B: Space is made out of "countless threads", and adding a thread to a circle made a circle into a sphere. Length, Height and Breath are all said to be a portion of what Space represents, and just few of its countless parts/forms.
For 1-A: The above mentioned space is "still under the Vast Expanse which is below Essence which is again under Daosource(step 4) which is again infinitely less domineering that Unknown Realms"
Against 1-B: Matt claims it's a stretch, but didn't seem to have gone into reasoning in depth yet.
Against 1-A: 1-B not being a thing makes 1-A impossible, so any argument against 1-B is against 1-A. As Quas said, trancsending 1-B could simply be a higher level of 1-B, and would need either transcending High 1-B or true platonic concepts to be proved 1-A.