- 157
- 23
Link to my Blog https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:MasqueTLDF/DxD_Cosmology please get this accepted so I can add it to the verse page and get started on upgrades for Character Profiles. This is the second step in something great!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nice mori PFPBump
I agreeLink to my Blog https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:MasqueTLDF/DxD_Cosmology please get this accepted so I can add it to the verse page and get started on upgrades for Character Profiles. This is the second step in something great!
Not exactly "dimensionless", closer to a higher dimension, it's beyond everything else. I don't think there's anything exactly against it being infinitely larger.The reasoning used in the blog seems to be reasonable enough, but if the Dimensional Gap is truly dimensionless, wouldn't that mean that it can't really be "infinitely bigger" than the realms it contains, on account of not having genuine size in the first place?
It'd still be able to scale to the maximum extent of the cosmology it contains, but technically speaking a direct quantitive comparison between the two would only be an analogy in that case.
Rating Game fields are at most 4-A due to having multiple stars. Isolation Barrier is high 3-A due to its connection to the sacred gear system (Which I forgot to add :3) and its comparison to the Dimensional Gap.i can understand the only dimensions except for the isolation/creation dimensions for rating games. It’s the same concept with a few that just cause it has stars, we don’t know how big it is for all we know it could just be as big as the anime wants it to be or as big as they only want to make for the game itself. It would be an assumption to assume it’s much bigger then we think
Still wouldn’t be considered as such for the rating games considering we don’t know how big of the dimension it is. There are actually a few series that had the same thing going on for them but it wasn’t accepted cause of the unknown size of the created dimension. That would also be like saying someone blowing up earth is 4-A cause we can see the stars in the skyRating Game fields are at most 4-A due to having multiple stars. Isolation Barrier is high 3-A due to its connection to the sacred gear system (Which I forgot to add :3) and its comparison to the Dimensional Gap.
? Rating Game fields mean the dimension containing them, a dimension with a starry sky is 4-A regardless.Still wouldn’t be considered as such for the rating games considering we don’t know how big of the dimension it is. There are actually a few series that had the same thing going on for them but it wasn’t accepted cause of the unknown size of the created dimension. That would also be like saying someone blowing up earth is 4-A cause we can see the stars in the sky
Rating Game fields are recreations of real life places. Example: Volume 2:I said multiple times that you nees to prove those are actual stars bruhh, it is standard
At the same time, there are no reason to assume they are real stars, so.......default assumption will be the lowest, not highest interpretation. SAO have direct anti-evidences, DxD on the other hand, assumption in both way, so at best, if we being lenient, then a possibly rating, not a full-blown. Anymore complain i think you should bring it up in a Q&A about standard, or revise it, if standard change then it is fine by meYEah, there's no reason to assume they aren't real stars when evidence suggests that the creations within a rating game are in fact real, this isn't SAO where you could argue it'sa skybox
I just provided evidence bro what.At the same time, there are no reason to assume they are real stars, so.......default assumption will be the lowest, not highest interpretation. SAO have direct anti-evidences, DxD on the other hand, assumption in both way, so at best, if we being lenient, then a possibly rating, not a full-blown. Anymore complain i think you should bring it up in a Q&A about standard, or revise it, if standard change then it is fine by me
2 staff (thread and admin)Anyway, how many "Agrees" do I need to get this accepted?
Okay, but what evidence is there to suggest the stars AREN'T real, like seriously is there anything beyond "The text did not very explicitly state that the stars in the Rating Game Field are real."At the same time, there are no reason to assume they are real stars, so.......default assumption will be the lowest, not highest interpretation. SAO have direct anti-evidences, DxD on the other hand, assumption in both way, so at best, if we being lenient, then a possibly rating, not a full-blown. Anymore complain i think you should bring it up in a Q&A about standard, or revise it, if standard change then it is fine by me
Then yeah u have to find evidence if they are real or not. Same reasoning on how big the rating game dimension is. We can’t just assume it’s as big as a universe or a solar systemYEah, there's no reason to assume they aren't real stars when evidence suggests that the creations within a rating game are in fact real, this isn't SAO where you could argue it'sa skybox
I'm not sure if people can see it or not but did I not literally just provide evidence? Is there an error or something?Then yeah u have to find evidence if they are real or not. Same reasoning on how big the rating game dimension is. We can’t just assume it’s as big as a universe or a solar system
This is happening in the general discussion thread as well where you can't see what I linked, and both instances are me copying text from another site so I'm a bit worried.I'm not sure if people can see it or not but did I not literally just provide evidence? Is there an error or something?
Find some administrators, inbox them with the link and ask for their opinions. Be nice and don't come as rude.Bump
I pinged admins (i have ping permissions)Find some administrators, inbox them with the link and ask for their opinions. Be nice and don't come as rude.
Yeah, I saw that as well. But only 1 admin replied, and he always replies, but 1 ain't enough, and asking to do it again seems disrespectful to you and them.I pinged admins (i have ping permissions)
Have you done it?Bump again
Done what?Have you done it?
Yeah, hold onAre there any other ways to get staff to view this, we just need one more agree and it could be added right?