• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Dragon Ball Super Discussion Thread 100

Well, it is expected, this same guy is the one who debate Goku at max is Multi Solar system, from what i know
F2OMD9XaEAAURuT.jpg

Remember that guy who came out of nowhere and downgraded the universe to finite and tried to downgrade the macrocosm to 3-A? Looks like we have a lot on our plate in the future (especially when you consider that even in the staff thread well after everything was accepted, people were still trying to derail with out-of-context DontTalk statements).
 
Akira Toriyama talking about characters' lines and such, all to be taken in the real sense of things.



Translation: Wired: With what posture do you see the words?

Toriyama: Anyway, I don't waste much time babbling about useless things. As a rule, you can understand the content to a certain extent from the images alone, and the words are nothing more than a supplement to them. I had this drilled into me by my first editor, I guess you could say…. If you're going to come out and say something, then do something that further strengthens the characterization, is what I mean.
 
It totally makes sense, I'm sorry my friends, I didn't know about these things
Nah... not your fault, between language barriers and cultural appropriation, it's almost impossible to say or do anything that'll won't be interpreted as offensive or negative in another place.

And completely impossible if extra-terrestrial civilizations do exist.
 
Last edited:
Since new 5D scaling and other stuff has been accepted for Dragon Ball as of late, these should be changed on the verse's page

"with Zeno being able to destroy timelines, which is a Low Complex Multiverse level feat."

"the franchise's canon has officially hit multiverse levels" (this doesn't have to do with the 5D ratings, its just weird when they said it hit cosmic when it should be multiverse level)

"Super Shenron exhibits strength equivalent to 54 Universes, and finally, Zen'ō, the Omni-King, currently stand at the top of the series' hierarchy at Low Complex Multiverse level." here

"stands at the top of alternative media's hierarchy at Low Complex Multiverse level, with the power capable of threatening the entirety of the non-canon multiverse."

This fine? I'm just checking if this is fine so Derek can edit the verse's page
3 of you guys liked this, does this mean a yes orr?
 
mofo classified as having 5-D range but gets blitzed by lightspeed smh
One question, does a time Dimension need to have a baseline spatial size to be significant? Example, if s universe has a subspace has its own time axis, but isn't universal in size, is it insignificant? I know spatial dimensions are, not sure if it's the same case with temporal
 
mofo classified as having 5-D range but gets blitzed by lightspeed smh
Tbh Zeno isn't even a DPS just a Nuke.
One question, does a time Dimension need to have a baseline spatial size to be significant? Example, if s universe has a subspace has its own time axis, but isn't universal in size, is it insignificant? I know spatial dimensions are, not sure if it's the same case with temporal
On this subject, is the default assumption for the time flow in a fictional universe to be the same as IRL without context? E.g 1 year on Earth isn't the same as 1 year on another planet and the light from stars in the night sky is significantly younger than the actual light source (the stars themselves).
 
Screenshot_20231113_084919_Discord.jpg
Oh my god, I’ve already seen anti-dragon ball servers spread “W Debunks” of the hypertimeline stuff😭

(At least I can prepare for the talking points before any CRT is made)

Even crazier how I addressed the illusionary time stuff blatantly
Correct me if I am wrong it is pendulum room which creates illusion
 
One question, does a time Dimension need to have a baseline spatial size to be significant? Example, if s universe has a subspace has its own time axis, but isn't universal in size, is it insignificant? I know spatial dimensions are, not sure if it's the same case with temporal
I am unsure of this myself, but from other examples I've seen from Qawsedf and how a space-time continuum works on site based on current standards, I believe a minimum universal size is required, yes.
 
Back
Top