Killerdrone123
He/Him- 2,054
- 1,764
Ok how do you get permission to post in staff thread dm a mod
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
we were already back to square one the moment the votes had to be recounted for the blog. it's objectively better to handle all of this in its own thread than a 15 page one.Then it got screwed and we were back to square one.
He can't disagree with the blog if his issues are about meeting standards as the crt has passed tbhWell, everything will be reset.
And we've already started with a disagreement if deagon sees this.
How many levels into Low 1-C is the current rating?I don’t think anyone wants to delve into on Geo’s rule breaking until DDT arrives to give his take, and that will take quite some time.
canon db is 5-D, dbh would be infinite 5-D ( there could possibly be support for a 6-d rating, but that needs its own thread.)How many levels into Low 1-C is the current rating?
At least we wouldn't have to wait 48 hours if the blog was accepted.we were already back to square one the moment the votes had to be recounted for the blog. it's objectively better to handle all of this in its own thread than a 15 page one.
it's an already accepted revision, i doubt the 48 hours is needed.At least we wouldn't have to wait 48 hours if the blog was accepted.
Will be. I doubt it isn't.it's an already accepted revision, i doubt the 48 hours is needed.
Dude, it's a staff review, you have to have permission to say something.this makes me sad
Why'd you add grand priest to the scale? He was never said that his EE was equal to Zeno, just that he and Zeno can erase people, he is never put on Zeno's tier on that front iircit's an already accepted revision, i doubt the 48 hours is needed.
staff are less likely to be interested in a 15 page thread. If another thread wasnt made, it would probably be just stuck in limbo.Making another thread was a really impatient and short sighted move, imo.
Oh shitt, I didn’t see thatDude, it's a staff review, you have to have permission to say something.
His erasure ability is said to be like zeno's on his profile, but if thats wrong i could remove itWhy'd you add grand priest to the scale? He was never said that his EE was equal to Zeno, just that he and Zeno can erase people, he is never put on Zeno's tier on that front iirc
Mommy?Nah bro's, just say that this blog is as per information accepted in the previous thread, if it aligns as per that or not and scaling of characters, it'll shift what needs to be evaluated, we shouldn't just keep Askin for input over same thing again and again as staffs will lose their interest.
If being stuck in limbo means waiting a maximum of two more days, maybe. You just opened up the door to uncertainty and possible confusion for no reason here imostaff are less likely to be interested in a 15 page thread. If another thread wasnt made, it would probably be just stuck in limbo.
It's better to remove. This is controversial and will only continue.His erasure ability is said to be like zeno's on his profile, but if thats wrong i could remove it
So it's better to delete it before the staff sees it.Oh shitt, I didn’t see that
Or I’m trying to get noticed by staff to end up on the staff survey
Yeah. I know most of us have accepted it by now, but still…Making another thread was a really impatient and short sighted move, imo.
Yes, we have practically lost any advantage and practically have an automatic disagreement.Yeah. I know most of us have accepted it by now, but still…
1. We have to wait another 48 hours, possibly far longer depending on the degree of derailing.
2. The whole basis for it was “no staff are returning to the thread because it’s 15 pages long,” but that’s not true. I’ve been staring at the staff online list for a while, and barely any staff have been active since last night (no kidding, they wouldn’t be active late at night or early in the day).
3. The fact that it’s accepted information didn’t stop the original thread from being disagreed with by Mav, Qaws, and Deagon solely because the originally disagreed with the time room stuff.
4. We already had one agree before, and not only might Deagonx be an automatic disagree, but they might argue that Qaws needs to reapprove.
I really fail to see the upside in this move.
Lordgriffit said he will no longer participate in tier 1 crts.Yes, we have practically lost any advantage and practically have an automatic disagreement.
It was very hasty for him to create another crt, especially without mentioning it to anyone.
Arale too, she is actually listed as 2B, equalling all of DBS timelines via her plot manip I believe, she would scale as wellThe ONLY canon character who should be given Low 1-C straight away is Zeno for actually busting a timeline on screen. Anything else is going to just complicate things.
using me as a descriptive term for a negative action isn’t very niceYes, we have practically lost any advantage and practically have an automatic disagreement.
It was very hasty for him to create another crt, especially without mentioning it to anyone.
It's not meant in terms of power but the fact that he has the ability, he isn't scaled to Zeno at allHis erasure ability is said to be like zeno's on his profile,
It's better if you do, before the opponents use that to open a directional can of wormsbut if thats wrong i could remove it
Checked the rules and we would've waited 48 extra hours anyway.Yeah. I know most of us have accepted it by now, but still…
1. We have to wait another 48 hours, possibly far longer depending on the degree of derailing.
staff are more likely to check a fresh new thread than a 15 pages long one. this is afact.2. The whole basis for it was “no staff are returning to the thread because it’s 15 pages long,” but that’s not true. I’ve been staring at the staff online list for a while, and barely any staff have been active since last night (no kidding, they wouldn’t be active late at night or early in the day).
He would only need to approve if there was a major change in the blog.3. We already had one agree before, and not only might Deagonx be an automatic disagree, but they might argue that Qaws needs to reapprove.
I really fail to see the upside in this move.
Nah we only need 48 hours after the creation of the crtChecked the rules and we would've waited 48 extra hours anyway.
staff are more likely to check a fresh new thread than a 15 pages long one. this is afact.
He would only need to approve if there was a major change in the blog.
has already been removedRemove GP from that thread ASAP