Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you want a valid one or just a feat? Because Bleach has more than 3 characters that would be able to sustain the verse but the feat isn't valid, KEKW.Is there an actually example of a character sustaining something they didn't create? And I don't mean, "the text never confirmed they created this space". I mean it is 100% apparent that the character did not create this space.
Edit: I just saw Lucifer up there. But is there any other
A valid one would be ideal.Do you want a valid one or just a feat? Because Bleach has more than 3 characters that would be able to sustain the verse but the feat isn't valid, KEKW.
This sounds like it would be good. If anything, it’s even better since based off what you said, he doesn’t need to constantly pump energy into that universe to sustain cosmic balance.I think Ultraman King might be a valid one. He was stabilizing the Side Space universe that had been destroyed by the Super Dimensional Eradication Bomb with his own energy. And when Belial started absorbing said energy from the universe said universe started to destabilize and collapse. But it didn’t collapse in story since he just so happened to have finished healing the universe after his energy was drained (and later returned) so he no longer needed to stabilize it. Also he himself is far stronger than characters that can effortlessly defeat Zero who is equal to Belial who tanked said bomb that caused the collapse of the universe.
I mean it ultimately depends case by case wise. Especially since Creation feats are also hit with the “prove it scales to AP” requirement that sustenance feats have of course.Also, i think most verses with sustain feats have another feat in that same level, so in the end nearly no one (afaik) will be downgraded from this revision, only the really unlucky verses.
Should get more opinions so don't take my word for it, but I don't think so. Generally speaking, an immediate timeframe is either instant or done in, like, a few minutes.Is one hour timeframe for stabilization/destabilization passable via current standards??
Fair enough...lets ask others too..Should get more opinions so don't take my word for it, but I don't think so. Generally speaking, an immediate timeframe is either instant or done in, like, a few minutes.
An hour seems to be kinda stretching it.
If there is a character holding a High 3A field and this field disappears after this character dies, the character should receive a High 3A rating. No matter what% of a High 3A area is occupied, it should still be High 3AI really don't see why the potency of the structure should matter.
no time frame outside infinity should be long for low 2C1 hour is too long for Low 2-C structure?
No to this, because a low 2-C structure is not automatically infinite in scope here.no time frame outside infinity should be long for low 2C
but infinite 3D space <low 2C structure? So it doesn't make sense that someone holding infinite 3D space is stronger than someone holding a low 2C spaceNo to this, because a low 2-C structure is not automatically infinite in scope here.
Sorry if I’m reading your response wrong, but I don’t think I quite understand.but infinite 3D space <low 2C structure? So it doesn't make sense that someone holding infinite 3D space is stronger than someone holding a low 2C space
I think we should separate for low 2C as follows. If it is not for the characters that keep the low 2C structure spatially, if the character holds the spacetime, 4D means that it holds a structure and it is 4D, so low 2CSorry if I’m reading your response wrong, but I don’t think I quite understand.
Low 2-C power is superior to infinite 3-D (because you know, 4-D starts here), but that doesn’t mean the size of the Low 2-C realm needs to be superior to a High 3-A one.
Yes and you would still need to prove the sustenance equals actual Low 2-C potency, and the latter is given by either one shotting a universal space-time or the destruction happens extremely quickly in a reasonable timeframe.I think we should separate for low 2C as follows. If it is not for the characters that keep the low 2C structure spatially, if the character holds the spacetime, 4D means that it holds a structure and it is 4D, so low 2C
Lets take this one bridge at a time...Yes and you would still need to prove the sustenance equals actual Low 2-C potency, and the latter is given by either one shotting a universal space-time or the destruction happens extremely quickly in a reasonable timeframe.
4-D by itself doesn't cut it.
Of course, it must be shown that space and time disappear at the same time because Space + Time = 4DYes and you would still need to prove the sustenance equals actual Low 2-C potency, and the latter is given by either one shotting a universal space-time or the destruction happens extremely quickly in a reasonable timeframe.
4-D by itself doesn't cut it.
No no, what I mean is that 4-D by itself doesn't mean it would be Low 2-C for the feat.Of course, it must be shown that space and time disappear at the same time because Space + Time = 4D
No matter how much you divide a 4D structure, it will still be 4D, so if space and time collapse together, this stabilization success should be considered as 4D and its time should be insignificant, but if only space collapses, 3D and time may be important.
No matter how much you divide 4D, does it not make 4d again, so no matter how immeasurable 4D is, shouldn't it be bigger and stronger than infinite 3D? Isn't the wiki like that?No no, what I mean is that 4-D by itself doesn't mean it would be Low 2-C for the feat.
It would be 4-D since its still effecting space-time, but it would be unquantifiable without a given scale of the feats 4-D power
No, not at all. We don't use dimensional tiering like that anymore. These days you need to prove something that's X-D is superior to Y-D, which is why dimensionality doesn't by default give any tier.No matter how much you divide 4D, does it not make 4d again, so no matter how immeasurable 4D is, shouldn't it be bigger and stronger than infinite 3D? Isn't the wiki like that?