(For the uninformed, DIO = Stardust Crusaders, Dio/Dio Brando = Phantom Blood)
I will like to restate this again for clarity:
It was never stated that DIO had somehow lost access to the various abilities he had demonstrated within Phantom Blood. He did not say it, the narrator did not say this, nobody had said this in either Phantom Blood or Stardust Crusaders.
This is
fact, there is no solid piece of evidence from the source that states this.
In order for us to accept that DIO has lost some of his abilities that he had demonstrated earlier (I say some for a reason, I will get to that later), there must be an implication of some sort that lends credibility to this assumption, otherwise it is nothing but conjecture.
By default, the assumption is that every character in any verse should retain abilities they had learned in a previous series or in this case, a previous part... unless stated otherwise of course. There is no reason we need to prove that a character has there abilities again, we simply do not operate like that.
Goku not using the Destructo-Disc in Dragon Ball Super is not enough reason to suggest that he is now unable to use it. Such a line of logic is not valid because it does not take into account the potential reasons why Goku had chose not to use it, such as now having more powerful moves or simply not finding the right situation or opportunity to use such a move.
We can apply the same to DIO.
Him not using Vaporizing Freeze or SRSE is not enough reason to suggest that he had suddenly lost the ability to do so. By default,
if there was nothing suggesting that he may have lost his abilities or control, then he should be able to do so. Him not doing so does not require me to prove why he did not do so, only Araki can really answer that. I can tell you that even if it may have been convinent and beneficial for him to do so it still isn't enough proof to warrant that he is now unable to do so. I can suggest that it borders on the line of
Character Induced Stupidity if it really was the case, but we just don't know what DIO was thinking.
This is just how we do things around here. I have no obligation to prove that DIO still has his abilities
IF there is nothing suggesting that he had lost him. We do not do it to other verses such as Dragon Ball or Naruto where similar occurences of characters never using an ability they had used in the past has happened, we are not doing it to JoJo's Bizzarre Adventure. If you wish to refute this
specific point, then you'll have to make a much larger revision that includes every verse where this situation has happened in the past and essentially change some of the fundemental logical reasoning we use here. (Which I am all for, so long as it is accurate and correct.)
I have not shifted the burden of proof unfairly, it simply is not my job to prove that he has lost an ability that he has used in the past. It is a baseline assumption that he hasn't.
But notice how I've been saying "
if" a couple of times now?
I'll step right in and address this for the sake of being accurate and fair:
there IS reason for DIO not being able to use his various vampire abilities.
He does not have the same body as before. It is the body of Jonathan Joestar, which he HAS said has been vaguely resisting him somehow. It is unknown how, though.
Anyway, since it has said that Jonathan Joestar has resisted him, we do know that should immediately mean he does not have full control of his own body. Since he himself has explicitly stated that
full control of his body is required for his Vaporizing Freeze, then at least that ability should not be able to be used by DIO.
This does
not mean every other ability should be eliminated from DIO's movepool, however. He has been able to use SRSE as only a head, and therefore DIO should be able to use it regardless of whether or not his body is resisting him, because he's used it without a body therefore making it redundant whether or not he can control his body. His Regenerationn shouldn't be as great, but only on a certain half of his body as said by his conversation with Hol Horse. One half regenerates just fine and he claims it as "his own", but the other half is slower and sluggish.
That covers what I believe up until Awakened DIO, which I shall now get into.
After drinking Joseph's blood, he himself has stated that the blood was making his body stronger than ever. The opposition has claimed that this is not proof enough that he can use his other abilities as it does not prove any sort of control.
Which is true, but that still falls under the assumption that Jonathan is still resisting him up until that point... which is not true based on what DIO had said to Vanilla Ice:
"It is likely that if I drink the blood of one more person, the body of Jonathan Joestar's which has resisted me, will fall completely under my control and this wound will heal."
Since then, DIO has drank the blood of not just an ordinary person which he implies would still regain control of his body, but the blood of a Joseph Joestar,which should be more compatible with the body of another Joestar.
So if he has complete control of his body right now, as stated by himself, why can't he use any of his abilities again?
If your next argument is still "well he didn't use them" then you're better off scrolling up and restarting, because I already explained him not using them is in no way proof of him not being able to use them, especially since by this point, there is absolutely nothing suggesting that he is unable to use them.
I'm moving on to your next arguments.
> He notably wanted to drain the blood of a Joestar and
sync himself with Jonathan's body to further improve his time stop ability. Nonetheless, once he drained the blood of Joseph Joestar,
DIO still had the potential to enhance his time stopping capabilities.
Yes, because it has been established stopping time is not based off control of ones body, but the physical dexterity and endurance one has. Just regular DIO was able to increase his timestop, but stopped short at 5 seconds because part of his body was weaker, not because of control, because logically if what you're saying is correct, he shouldn't have any at this point in time.
Jotaro and Diego are both able to cap at a 5 second timestop, meanwhile it stating that DIO can continue to improve beyond that is more proof of the strength of his body, not the amount of control he has over it. Either way, pretty irrelevant since I've proven he should have total control and amazing strength after Joseph's blood.
>Essentially, Jonathan's undead body
still has Hamon in his bloodstream since DIO possesses a
Hermit Purple-like Stand (Jonathan's Stand) and how he drained the
blood of a Hamon User to further assimilate with
Jonathan's body - DIO cannot conduct neither Fire nor Ice.
Your proof and evidence is spot on but your conclusion is iffy. The statement from Araki does not state that hamon = hermit purple, only that those who use hamon would have the personification of it as well, hermit purple.
We still need proof that Hermit Purple is permanently conducting hamon, because that does not seem to be the case.
He has explicitly wrapped it around DIO and has had it do no damage whatsoever, kind of strange if it really conducting hamon. Furthermore he has actually yelled to DIO that he was going to combine both Hermit Purple and hamon which debunks WOG and your argument, since it's redundant to combine Hermit Purple and hamon if the latter is already made up of hamon.
MY CONCLUSION: The opposition has done a fantastic job of refuting the reasoning and logic behind my arguments fairly (I did create a lot of logical fallacies I guess), while providing insufficient evidence to refute my core argument.
TLDR: DIO does not have total control over his body and has not demonstrated abilities. Therefore he should only have SRSE (which does not require a body at all). However, Awakened DIO has been stated to have regained his total control and strength over his body. I do not need to prove why a character has not lost their abilities when it is no longer implied.
Also: "if we take the previous logic as true" as the hypothetical conclusion would only follow if the premise is validated.
Correct, because by default the previous logic should be incorrect, however, assuming that it is correct, the hypothetical conclusion would still serve to invalidate it.