Ser_Hakim_Dayne
He/Him- 4,595
- 1,239
In both cases it is an assumption because it is neither said nor shown that Vergil unseals it, he just allows it to take a name.Wait, so were under this assumption that unsealing has to be some ritual act or chants or curses? Can it not be just thought or will?
Unseal the Demon with a thought?
There is no contradiction in my understanding. The demon can name itself because Vergil allows it through his name manipulation, otherwise it could not.Yeah they have to ask him to give them their names. But Pride names himself? So why does he need the Sons of Sparda?
See the contradiction in your understanding.
They are asked to give them their names but because Vergil doesn't know the Demon's name he allowed(unsealed) the Demon to Name himself.
At first the demon asks him to give him his name, but Vergil doesn't know his name so he allows him to take it back. If Vergil knew it he would have given it directly. If Vergil just needed to unseal the demon the latter would not have asked him to give him his name.
Sparda took away their names and sealed them in a statue, and Vergil allowed them to take back their real names so that they could regain their power and destroy the statues that covered them. That's what I understand.Just curious but do you think that in this entire scene, there is no sealing or unsealing going on. If however, you believe the act occurs how do you vision it occurs. I just want to understand your position better
FairLacks the intellect.