Now for this:
First off, it's not a good look that you're starting by basically saying "if you disagree, you just need to pay more attention."
This is all still in response to a conjectural statement of "he might have been vaporized."
And once again, him being vaporized is completely false.
Part of his clothing is still hanging onto part of the arena several episodes later, unless you wanna tell me that he not only magically regenerated his clothing, but also magically brought that destroyed part of his clothing back to the same spot it was in before, with the same damage to it and all.
Needless to say, that's a hefty assumption that simply can't be feasibly made.
The Grand Priest is not infallible, as shown later. He assumes 17 to be dead after his self-destruction, even with his Cosmic Awareness, which is proven false 3 episodes later.
I don't agree with Damage's logic of "characters have concealed their energy before" as that's not what I think it is. Rather, I'd say Goku's energy couldn't be felt because it was so infinitesimally small at that point in time due to Goku being nearly dead. Energy dropping to such a low amount when a character is near death has a precedent.
Null explained the Krillin situation, so I'll be the one to explain that if you're claiming Goku was in fact vaporized, you'd need to also accept that this would mean Goku's clothing was also vaporized, which means he had to have magically created it again, which is an assumption with no backing to it.
Hell, the opposite is shown with MUI Goku, as him turning MUI literally destroys his top.
Some of the specific reasoning given was a bit ridiculous, I'd agree, but the debunk itself is actually very strong and I'd say there's no good reason to give Regeneration or Resurrection here. Neither of these have actually been proven. I was in support of the thread being reopened due to you saying you had arguments to give, but these are far from strong arguments.
Argument aside, tone it down. You don't just tell someone "do better" because you don't like their arguments, it's never this serious
No, it is not identical. Not in the slightest.
And I still remain in staunch disagreement with adding any sort of ability to Goku from this.