DID it's literally rejected as an power and you still says that we can use it.... if you don't like it you can make an thread for that..
Because it's psychological, posession is something that directly goes to your mind/body and possess it & psychological changes it because it's the own mind that does that.
And... Explain to me how 1 gatekeeper alter = multiple benign alters = DID (a rejected power on the wiki). I already know why CH shouldn't have multiple selves via DID; it's physiological.
Alters/personalities do go in the body and assume direct control over it. The psychological aspect of the alters/personalities is why they're implied to take control over the person's body, not the reason why they can't do possession. Explain how DID being psychological makes this not possession.
I was reading the old thread
here regarding your point about it being psychological, and doesn't characters like
the horde have DID, and yet have superpowers relating to some of the alters as justification for their alters' abilities staying on the profile? Should we remove genius intelligence because it's psychological alone? The difference between the horde's abilities, and genius intelligence to something psychological like autism is that the first 2 have a superpower most people don't have.
I was talking about lasers, uh-hu & these both are still reflected by things on the distance. The factors that decreases light range are the own things on the space, what I'm saying is that 100LY-15GY is obviously not an limit, it can travel much far but all of this will never happen due to the things on the space so CH range should've planetary at best.
1: If you're trying to debunk light range. Why did you pull up the point of light being potentially endless even when I said electromagnetic waves (yes, that does include radio waves and light) can travel potentially endlessly before you said something similar, but light can't travel 15 GLY due to factors I already mentioned..
I already knew that light can't 100% travel 15 GLY from the start. You're just agreeing with me at this point.
2: Isn't it common sense that radiowaves aren't the same thing as light? Both exist in different wavelengths; the former are a bunch of broadcasted messages and the latter are a bunch of photons that we know have limits. You got this?
Obviously, let's check birds for example.
The kid never touched the ground, so he didn't receive thousands volts of electricity.
Ok.
1: You don't have to be an expert to know that birds and humans have a different physiology.
Not to mention that their feet don't conduct electricity like human hands because they're at the same electrical potential.
2: Explain how not touching the ground is going to save the boy from an electric current.
Did they found an body electricity superior of an average human? (like with the other guy) and medics didn't prove how the kid "survived" that quantity of volts because that never happened and that's why they say "apparently" because he never received that shock. The wet thing is an pure assumption due to the temperature, but you can't be sure if he was wet when the kid goes in the wires.
If the boy wasn't wet, then prove how the boy wasn't sweating under the hot, humid conditions in india. I know what's it's like to live in the desert heat since I live in it, and you should too since Argentina has heat waves. The extra humidity from a place like india
would just make living there feel hotter and retain sweat on your skin.
And it's implied that the medics did the check up after he did his electricity stunts. "
He added: ‘Doctors did some blood test and did an overall check up but they found nothing wrong with me.
‘Instead they started taking pictures of me on their camera, like I was some famous Bollywood actor or something. It was quite funny.'
" They started taking pictures since they knew he was the boy that withstood electricity that would've been fatal to a normal person.
Where? Because they never prove the claim, the impressive things are he touching the wires in water.
The journalist stated that he touched a pole that had 11 K volts and acknowledged (along with experts) that's dangerous for him. That should fall within your common sense. And the journalist in question has been proven to have the motive to report facts, and not just myths or aliens that they've seen and unfortunately can't prove.
And if the claim of 11 K volts hasn't been proven, then explain the reaction of everyone else around him if him touching 11 K volts didn't happen. The boy has high confidence in his resistance and is more than willing to carelessly expose himself to wires that aren't in water.
Doesn't change the fact that they can stop and reduce the piercing effect of bullets. So what's next? medieval armor can't stop knife slashes anymore because they can't stop a 9-B sniper bullet onto itself?
It's not. Reducing human skin damage =/= Armor durability.
We have examples like
Robocop page that is on the same case and doesn't have damage reduction.
"& as you say it doesn't reduces human skin damage." - You a couple of replies ago in regards to armor.
Wut. Where did I say or unintentionally imply that reducing skin damage is armor durability? You don't need to counter something I didn't say or has been debunked.
"It can also be argued that the bullet proof vest and it's material reduces the penetration damage of bullets, and
normal biological material like human skin can't stop bullets. Still seems like a good reasoning to keep damage reduction by body armor. And I find it ironic that the same page also says "reduce penetration". Same case for
armored bullet resistant cars and it's material."
I said that the armor and it's material reduces the piercing effect of bullets. I compared human skin to armor to prove armor is superior, not that reducing human skin damage alone is durability. And Robocop's case is just fiction, and we don't know the exact mechanisms on how he withstands things.
It will do nothing after touch the atmosphere.
Intergalactic is not the limit, in any case it's Universal.
Can you prove that an ability's potency is required for range [an ability's capacity to reach a certain distance]? So far, I only see it affecting an ability/attack's reach. The range page doesn't say that if an ability or attack can do anything a certain distance, it would only count as range. It only says range requires if an ability/attack can reach a certain distance, regardless of potency.