Clarifying the sufficient number of staff for accepting a revision (STAFF ONLY)

[CloverDragon03]

The changes proposed by AKM make sense to me

 

[AKM sama]

Alright, mind checking the sandbox once again?

Seems good.

 

[Antvasima]

So have we reached any conclusions here, and if so, what, more specifically?

 

[CloverDragon03]

Well it seems like Dread's current draft following AKM's suggestions will end up being what's accepted, as most already agreed to previous iterations of it before the aforementioned suggestions were made.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. Can somebody link to the current draft please?

 

[ImmortalDread]

Okay. Can somebody link to the current draft please?

ImmortalDread/Discussion Rule

vsbattles.fandom.com

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you very much for the help.

I think that your draft mostly looked good, but performed some cleanup work regarding sentence structure and language flow, and removed a case of redundant repitition.

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/U...Rule?type=revision&diff=7845371&oldid=7844039

 

[AKM sama]

It looks good now.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. The new text can probably be added now then.

 

[KLOL506]

Has it been added?

 

[Antvasima]

I have done so. Please tell me here if any important information has accidentally been removed during the edit.

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Discussion_Rules?type=revision&diff=7846177&oldid=7836007

 

[AKM sama]

It looks good.

 

[Dereck03]

Yeah, changes seems fine.

 

[CloverDragon03]

All seems fine to me too

 

[Crabwhale]

This is fine.

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you for the evaluations. Is there anything left to do here, or should we close this thread?

 

[Dereck03]

Nope, everything is alright.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. I will close this thread then.

A big thank you to everybody who helped out here, especially ImmortalDread and AKM sama.