• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Can CM affecting NEP?

Yes for NEP 2. Depends on the concept. If you can manipulate the concept of someone's mind then it would work on NEP 2. Its not like they're devoid of all concepts
 
Yes for NEP 2. Depends on the concept. If you can manipulate the concept of someone's mind then it would work on NEP 2. Its not like they're devoid of all concepts
They don't have mind and don't have concept of being someone so no, you need feat if affecting NEP 2 to affect NEP2.
 
NEP 2 is just devoid of your concept. Not devoid of all concepts. if that were the case you would be devoid of all concepts of dimensions and be outerversal. You would also be unbound by any concept
Being unbound by concepts isn't Outerversal
That's not how that works here.
 
Look...being unbounded by all concepts doesn't make you 5D. Transcending the concepts of space and time of a 4D universe does tho
 
Did you even read the NEP page?
Yes and i found this, NEP2 entities are typically presented as primordial voids or pure emptiness

2: Idealistic Nonexistence: The lack of absolutely everything to a state of nonexistence at a conceptual level. Such a state defies even the most basic logical principles and is unknowable in the truest form, as it is not a state at all. Such entities are typically presented as primordial voids or pure emptiness, or any abstract state which precedes or opposes the state of existence on all levels. In terms of binary, this would be something that is neither 1 nor 0, where 1 is existence and 0 is nonexistence.
 
Another absurd claim...
Why is it absurd?
Lacking concepts =/= being superior.

And all concepts is only whatever scale exists in a verse.
If you lack a concept of death, you wouldnt be bound by death. Same logic applies. Why would it only apply to whatever concepts exist in a verse when its all concepts? Still didn't tell me how NEP 2 means you are a conceptless being devoid of all concepts which would be non duality
 
NEP type 2 lacks everything including all concepts even lacking a narrative/plot

NEP type 2 is the most broken invincibility ability you can have. The only way you can touch such a being is by having feats of affecting that being.

Conceptual Manipulation of any type would not work on them, and Smurf abilities of any level would not other
 
Why is it absurd?

If you lack a concept of death, you wouldnt be bound by death. Same logic applies. Why would it only apply to whatever concepts exist in a verse when its all concepts? Still didn't tell me how NEP 2 means you are a conceptless being devoid of all concepts which would be non duality
Being unbound by space-time isn't even a feat nowadays, same goes for being unbound by anything. And lacking concepts isn't even non-duality. You just dont exist on a conceptual level. Quit trying to make this more impressive than it is.

That's how we treat it and you just stating otherwise won't change it. Don't like how that works? Revise the Tiering System and Conceptual Manipulation.
 
Being unbound by space-time isn't even a feat nowadays, same goes for being unbound by anything. And lacking concepts isn't even non-duality. You just dont exist on a conceptual level. Quit trying to make this more impressive than it is.

That's how we treat it and you just stating otherwise won't change it. Don't like how that works? Revise the Tiering System and Conceptual Manipulation.
Non-duality?
 
Back
Top