- 120
- 19
what's a requires for characters to become boundless level?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Can Anyone explain example of tier 0 in simple way pls?
- Thread starter Krazydog050
- Start date
- 7,141
- 4,635
It's being transcendent of any and all qualities and properties; weak and strong, powerless and omnipotent, real and fictional, etc. As long as this is sufficiently explained and their is no anti-feats, then such as being would qualify for Tier 0.
- 120
- 19
- Thread starter
- #3
What about High 1-A and High 1-A+?
- 120
- 19
- Thread starter
- #4
So you mean even based cosmology its Low 2-C. But when one character with this explanation appear, The verse will become Tier 0 cosmology right?
- 7,141
- 4,635
Well 1-A is something that see's a lower reality as fictional or equivalent, and if something see's that 1-A as similarly fictional that would be a layer in 1-A, an infinite number of these layers would be 1-A+. Now imagine all of these layers were like steps on a ladder, someone High 1-A would see not just the lower step, but the entire ladder as fictional.
High 1-A+ meanwhile is basically something that embodies or is on the level of all possibilities; everything that is possible for a Tier 0 to create.
- 120
- 19
- Thread starter
- #6
I thought that High 1-A+ is character that see an infinite stack of High 1-A as fiction. Like High 1-A did to 1-A+.
- 5,861
- 14,687
Nah. That'd be just also High 1-A.
- 120
- 19
- Thread starter
- #8
New tiering system for 1-A/ High 1-A/ 0 is easier to understand now. Old one that depending on number of dimensionality is very confusing. About that inaccessible cardinals or aleph number really hurt my brain. Thank you for your new tiering system.
Last edited:
- 2,094
- 2,329
Its actually the opposite, way harder. Tier 0 will go down to single digits probably, so will High 1-A+. R>F standards are far stricter and etc.
- 5,861
- 14,687
He means "easier to access" as in, easier to understand, probably.
- 2,094
- 2,329
Oh yeah, probably.
- 285
- 110
Damm apophatic theology is perfect for that
- 285
- 110
Still better than those immeasurable,irrelevant and infinite layers into boundless wanks
- 120
- 19
- Thread starter
- #14
About R>F, If I said entire universe which is Low 2-C. It's just a story in a book for an Alien. And that Alien can change story inside a book whether he like, And all of reality inside a book doesn't know an existent of that Alien, All of existent in a book cannot be come "Real and exist in same state as an Alien. Like fictional character cannot exist in real world" Will he become solid 1-A?
- 2,094
- 2,329
That actually does sound like 1-A IMO, yeah.
- 285
- 110
- 120
- 19
- Thread starter
- #17
Also. Eventhought I have this statement, But accidentally put a word like, Alien is exist in higher dimension that reality inside a book cannot exist as same state as him. Will an Alien being disqualify from being 1-A?
- 2,094
- 2,329
I dont exactly understand what you mean here? If you're asking if the statement "a book cannot exist as same state as him" is a contradiction, then no, if anything it backs up R>F.
- 120
- 19
- Thread starter
- #19
I mean 1-A is exist beyond dimensional system right? But I put a word that meant to be still using dimensional system. So will this be disqualify from 1-A?
- 7,141
- 4,635
If you think it's 1-A then create the CRT and provide the scans/quotes. Nothing anyone says matters until an actual thread is created and is evaluated.
- 120
- 19
- Thread starter
- #21
- 2,094
- 2,329
Oh, no I don't think it does. Generally, if the verse itself treats it as r>f transcendence and it aligns with 1-A, then it will be treated as just that, so it being referred to as dimensional shouldn't matter. It would be case-by-case anyhow.
Yeah, this would be for the better.
- 285
- 110
Nope dimension does not always mean dimensionality. It just depends on the nature of the higher dimensions.
Higher dimension =higher plane,world
- 285
- 110
I literally have a verse that calls higher reality dimension.
That same higher dimensional is stated to transcerd time and space,dimensions and also has r>f over space and time.
- 2,094
- 2,329
Alright, and? I basically said what you said.
- 285
- 110
Just an exempel
Similar threads
