• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Calculation Evaluations (New forum)

VersusJunkie54 said:
Priority 3 (Heavy Weapon that is in a league of its own)
Verse: Halo
Feat: The Incineration Cannon can destroy Flood Graveminds/Spore Mountains
Click to expand...
VersusJunkie54 said:
Priority 1-2 (New calculation for heavy weapons that influence the durability of characters in verse, a feat possibly applicable to unarmoured Spartans, and some potentially more accurate recalculations of older calcs)
Verse: Halo
Feats: Thorne has a boulder smashed on his face, Tanaka runs through a boulder, Wraith Mortar recalculated, Fuel Rod Cannon blast, Longsword Missiles, and Guardians blow up Doisac.
Click to expand...
Bump
 
Hixkaryana said:
Shouldn’t the best solution be to hire more Calc members?
Click to expand...
I mean there's three ways becoming a mod goes.
1. They get promoted and work consistently hard.
2. They get promoted, work hard, burn out, stay silent for eternity.
3. They get promoted and instantly become inactive.
 
Arceus0x said:
I mean there's three ways becoming a mod goes.
1. They get promoted and work consistently hard.
2. They get promoted, work hard, burn out, stay silent for eternity.
3. They get promoted and instantly become inactive.
Click to expand...
They should really come up with a fix, and preferably one that could involve getting calcs validated by the community members with basics if they've been lingering for too long. It's not really fair for people to have to wait for YEARS to simply see one of their many calcs getting accepted.
 
Hixkaryana said:
They should really come up with a fix, and preferably one that could involve getting calcs validated by the community members with basics if they've been lingering for too long. It's not really fair for people to have to wait for YEARS to simply see one of their many calcs getting accepted.
Click to expand...
Nah, that'd bring too much anarchy. I'd say putting in a small weekly quota would be better, like "please evaluate around 7 calculations a week", and that's it. Could be lower or higher, idk how hard the evaluation job is, but it can get annoying when you see people bumping calcs for the 9000th time while some calc members haven't been active for actual months it seems.

Edit: the month part was an accidental over exaggeration. But there's definitely people who you'll barely see or who won't evaluate anything you sent them despite not having a warning in their profile about them not checking stuff sent to their page.
 
Arceus0x said:
Nah, that'd bring too much anarchy. I'd say putting in a small weekly quota would be better, like "please evaluate around 7 calculations a week", and that's it. Could be lower or higher, idk how hard the evaluation job is, but it can get annoying when you see people bumping calcs for the 9000th time while some calc members haven't been active for actual months it seems.

Edit: the month part was an accidental over exaggeration. But there's definitely people who you'll barely see or who won't evaluate anything you sent them despite not having a warning in their profile about them not checking stuff sent to their page.
Click to expand...
I assume it depends on each calc's length of time needed to re-create it and see if the results match like some scientists do w/new discoveries; some could take a few minutes/hours, others days or even weeks.
 
JnSteHar002 said:
I assume it depends on each calc's length of time needed to re-create it and see if the results match like some scientists do w/new discoveries; some could take a few minutes/hours, others days or even weeks.
Click to expand...
It'd make sense but most calcs aren't shonen calcs that were filed down to pixel perfect precision over time. They are usually "dude broke wall. Wall square. Wall this big compared to dude. Frag is 8 j/cc, he is wall level". Like it'd take a few minutes to check if it's right.
 
Arceus0x said:
Nah, that'd bring too much anarchy. I'd say putting in a small weekly quota would be better, like "please evaluate around 7 calculations a week", and that's it. Could be lower or higher, idk how hard the evaluation job is, but it can get annoying when you see people bumping calcs for the 9000th time while some calc members haven't been active for actual months it seems.

Edit: the month part was an accidental over exaggeration. But there's definitely people who you'll barely see or who won't evaluate anything you sent them despite not having a warning in their profile about them not checking stuff sent to their page.
Click to expand...
I highly doubt every Calc member is gonna respect that quota plus they're gonna have to dig the very old untapped ones from like 3 years ago and work their way up progressively with new calcs emerging and it'll just take ages.
 
Hixkaryana said:
I highly doubt every Calc member is gonna respect that quota plus they're gonna have to dig the very old untapped ones from like 3 years ago and work their way up progressively with new calcs emerging and it'll just take ages.
Click to expand...
3 years is an over exaggeration. It's more like a few calcs forgotten to be evaluated who've been bumped for a few months.

Anyways let's not clutter the thread.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

EddisherSound
Small tweak to Shin Ultraman
Replies
5
Views
400
EddisherSound
EddisherSound
Random-Helper323
  • Locked
Remaking a DMC Lady Calculation
Replies
18
Views
962
Random-Helper323
Random-Helper323
Hagane_no_Saiyajin
Issues with getting the distance
Replies
20
Views
1K
Floxy178
Floxy178
BrevJr
Freedom Planet Calculation - Verification/Tips needed (Absolution Destroying the Palace Floor)
Replies
1
Views
943
Bobsican
Bobsican
AKM sama
New Staff Promotions
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Back
Top