Seriously how in the hell are you getting this from that statement? He literally describes what he did in that situation and you came to the conclusion it's some sort of abstract analogy about shrouding darkness in light?
He doesn't need to put glasses and a suit on, then give you a 50 minute lecture, accompanied by a 20 page thesis on how his attack works.
First, what part of "beam of light" sounds hyperbolic to you? If I say "die villainous scum at the explosion of my nuclear bomb!", is nuclear bomb hyperbolic?
Considering Mask's statements are not inherently hyperbolic by definition, because hyperboles by definition are not literal, and Mask himself is very literal, this is just a faulty interpretation. Allow me to re-propose a better interpretation backed up by the feats of the attack itself.
As Cyber so graciously points out with the scans, Mask fires a laser that is refered to as a "beam of light", said "beam of light" later reflects off the provably reflective surface of a blade.anyway for new comers:
光線/Kōsen beam; light ray
The beam is called light
Reflecting in a reflective material (Zanpakutô already demonstrated to be reflective )
Travel straight
Does not explode, simply burns / vaporizes what comes in contact
Renji intercepting beam of light
vsbattles.fandom.com
Calc itself is already accepted at 1.29c
I do not remember. We were initially trying to build a working structure for the wiki, so our procedures were looser back then.
Do you know that you can... agree with someone else's argument because it made sense to you, without adding anything of your own? Ant isn't knowledgeable about the issue, so expecting him to add his own arguments is foolish. He can simply look at both arguments presented and decide for himself which one makes more sense to him as a whole.
Just wanna have you read that @Antvasima if you haven’t already
Except for more than one there is no strict standard. It depends a bit on how strong the individual evidence is, though, even if there is no strict written standard on that.
That is referencing a really specific aspect of relativism, which is only possessed by lightspeed things and light in particular. That evidence is so strong that it almost carries lightspeed on its own.
Personally, I like the wiggle room, but I suppose it would help people with evaluation if we did.
I think a strict classification in strong and weak would be difficult. On one hand, because we're talking about a spectrum, and on the other because individual details are relevant, too. Like, how reliable a person a statement comes from and the context surrounding it also has significance. A statement delivered as a result of scientific research would for example weigh heavier than one that comes from a casual line.
All I mean is make that more transparent on the LS page.
That seems like a valid point.
While I can see the point you are trying to make, Isshin wasn’t alive/or at least part of the Gotei 13/Quincy genocide considering Masaki is the first Quincy he has seen or met and he didn’t recognise her as a Quincy despite seeing her repeatedly spam arrows at White. Considering Isshin’s complete lack of knowledge on Quincies and the Databook similarly saying Uryu’s basic arrow is made of light, it makes more sense that Kisuke is explaining how it all works to Isshin rather than referencing a specific move when you see all the detail he includes in said explanation for literally everything (that isn’t something he knows Isshin will know like Gigai). Uryu’s arrows are also not noted to be different from those of other Quincy with Ichigo’s only comment on them being the power difference. Given that Kisuke was able to attain this arrow of light before when he managed to save the Visoreds which would be rather difficult if it was a special type of arrow (we know that not all Quincies can learn all the techniques), how Quincies hide from Shinigami as a rule and are so few in number that living Quincies are nothing but a rumor to the highest ranking Shinigami.
Donttalk, anta, dragon, damage, akm and armorchopy, yeah it is 6
