I don't know how Earl's massive wall of text that are as big as yours are bare bones unless you mean your own arguments are bare bones. But on the other part, I don't agree with everything because the argument against it simply makes much more sense and thus share Matthew's opinion on the subject.
Your argument aren't bare bones, that was the whole point of my post. I recommend you to drop that aggresive tone that isn't fit for a staff member and read the others' posts before going against them.
And they explained why you're wrong if you've been following this entire thread. Both sides can play this game, and it isn't healthy on either way, so don't use cheap tactics like that as an argument.
Gonna need a scan for this, and by that i mean link me a video where this whole thing happens with a timestamp.
Funny you use this one, considering we can easily say "it was a ward and it was blown away", rather than "explosion with power modification lol".
First of all, not what was said in the scans, it said "she lost her possibilities", not "possibilities as a concept ceased to exist".
Do you have any more context on this "greater" though. Yes they have shown some of the same applications but "greater" still doesn't mean you should scale to the whole versatility.
Which was just because they also have all their info erased in other words you lack the information to use PI which was stated to be necessary for it.
That's kind of desperate on your side. Considering i never said "you're right" i just said "leave this for the end cus it has more to discuss.
You haven't proved she can revive off of them though. Very important part of whatever you're discussing.
Having a couple of similar applications doesn't mean they have all the same applications though....
They exist even though they're not supposed to. Not "they exist while not existing". It's just a case of they "do exist", they just "shouldn't". There is a huge difference between do/don't and should/shouldn't. They do not contradict each-other.
I mean you completely skipped the point so....what am i supposed to think? Considering even now you chose to skip it there are 2 options here, either i assume you conceded or i assume you sneakily tried to skip that point hoping people would forget because you lack the arguments against it.
Maybe "rude" is a bit wrong, but it's still accusing people of stuff.
When did i mention her forcefield and tracking ward is the same thing? Doesn't change the fact that it's a "ward", has to be constructed and can be "blown away by explosions". It's pretty clear it's far more tangible than your "ki sensing" is making it out to be.
Still don't see the scans for "she cannot die for as long as the possibilities exist".
Some still doesn't mean on so i don't see your point.
>She is unable to exist because no one is observing her.
I don't think you accuse people of desperate, they either come out as desperate or they don't. And i never said it's desperate for you to ask ion for elaboration. Read again.
We don't use those tho, it's the first thing said in the note 4.
Oh, it changed again apparently. I just recall the timeless void standard changes a while ago.
Here is what our Speed page currently says:
Not what they stated on the scans, she may have other methods, doesn't mean it's the only method.
Semantics. Still doesn't mean all the same applications, stick to what it has shown.
As i said, she can easily be a special case considering how she is pretty special either way. And even if i were to assume this was correct, that's still not transduality. She doesn't transcend the dual concept of existence and nonexistence. She would just be both at the same time. Because she "does exist". Also that is further denied by the fact that "proof of existence" which is the requirement for PI to work is just information about you in the past and present, which as Ragna stated was already erased, so the PI point doesn't really help.
It's not a form of AE. It's the old type 3 as i've said several times. It's just the usual "oh i embody this" without further context which doesn't give AE anymore (before it would give type 3, now it's nuked so it's nothing).
That supporting stuff doesn't add up to Low 1-C, the less we have things like that written in profiles the less confusing everything will be. Transcending doesn't mean much, if a building is above other building then destroying the former doesn't mean much next to destroying the latter.
Well, what sentences with evidence you propose in their regen that would have everything pointed out? That would only that a few. Also are you sure that main villain isn't using it in a unique way or the like?
More or less as it's not even that, one can say it became one with x weird thing without losing physical form, gaining durability or powers 100% on the level of said x weird thing, but only powers to manipulate it to some extent. That can happen.
