Ok so while we have the break time i will post the reasoning for why Low 1-C is whack.
There are 2 main "arguments" for the Low 1-C boundary so let's go over them 1 by 1.
Transcending time and space and transcending the world
Let's begin to discuss why this isn't enough justification.
For 1, transcending doesn't necessarily mean "surpass" everything, it can easily mean just "outside", which needless to say isn't a word that can give a higher dimension. You may rightfully ask "well we do not assume that
transcending means
outside by default so we can assume the statement to mean
surpass". Well that is indeed correct and it would be a fair point if it weren't for the fact that another scan specifically states that
The boundary is a space outside of the world. Rendering the transcending statements far....less believable than they would usually be.
Containing the possibilities
Exactly as the wording states the boundary contains the "possibilities", not the universes.
Although there is a connection between "possibility" and "universe", they are
not the same thing. The relation between them is that there is a universe for each possibility, and that
a universe represents 1 possibility. Not that a possibility and a universe are the same thing, this whole idea stems from the fact that they can be used interchangeably as terms when it comes to their number, which as i said is the same.
On the other hand, what is a possibility? Well it is just an
event,
a phenomena it is
1 of the things that can happen in the future,
a possible outcome. We can see this when Rachel explains Phenomena Intervention. But what is the exact quote for containing the possibilities:
This is the place where every single moment, every single event, every single possibilities drifts. It was to let Raquel observe everything.
So Boundary contains every single "event", "possibility". And we explained how the relation between these 2. So how can an event be in a place. Well that's the easiest part. Events are just information, something that happened that can be stored as easily as data on a computer. And let's just say that a place with
infinite information that contains all of the information about a world would obviously contain every event that happened in the form of information. So "every single possibility drifts" is not referring to the universes, possibilities are not universes, they are just related in a way i explained above.
But this seems just like im saying it's not Low 1-C just by saying why the reasons for it are not Low 1-C, is there any other proof that outright contradicts these places being Low 1-C?
Yes indeed.
The boundary is a place outside of the universe,
it is separated from the universes through a space where time does not exists called the Edge (very reminiscent of the space in-between universes and directly contradicting it containing the universe if it is separated from them through the space between universes).
The boundary only connects the universes, it serves as a connection point and
It is stated that to go to a different universe you'd have to go "beyond" the boundary (which directly contradicts them being contained inside it. Since if it were it wouldn't be going beyond the boundary to reach another place you'd still be in the boundary). Which makes these statements and explanations even more supported by the fact that the boundary is described
"parallel universe" (with more proof on parallel being that these 2 are not supposed to intersect at all, let alone be contained) and
"another dimension" as opposed to "a higher dimension" (which, from experience in a recent debate including this very topic, really matters when you're trying to argue for it).
To sum up, not only are the things used to prove Low 1-C just not enough or not necessarily Low 1-C at all, as
@Eficiente said, but it is also straight up contradicted by several other quotes and scans from the games.
