- 4,955
- 3,768
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
- 39,646
- 15,557
How much time higher the mega evo and gigantamax is? Considering Mega Evo is much higher than 6.2 GT while Gigantamax is much higher than 14+ GT
- 39,646
- 15,557
So not the option 1?
- 39,646
- 15,557
Oh shit, it is the option 1 that accepted, my bad lel
So Mega Evo would be around 12 GT and Gigantamax would be around 70 GT, not bad
- 17,215
- 12,655
- Thread starter
- #207
when it comes to scaling g-max i mean like 5x 3.1
- 39,646
- 15,557
Wait, so how about the 6.2 GT for Mega Evo and 14+ GT for Gigantamax? Rejected?
- 17,215
- 12,655
- Thread starter
- #209
- 39,646
- 15,557
So no multiplier/scaling chain for these two?
- 17,215
- 12,655
- Thread starter
- #211
basically
megas > Marrowak with thick club = 2x 3.1gt
G-max > 5x attack from ash's pikachu (Pikachu 2x, Dragonite 2x, Riolu 1x)
Leon's Charizard at least > 2.5x as he used a super-effective move to take out a g-max
- 39,646
- 15,557
Hmm, alright then
- 12,562
- 2,517
- 17,215
- 12,655
- Thread starter
- #215
I feel like keeping some would be fine as otherwise it'd be a pain to find. Or you can just make a blog "poke-calcs archive" and add them
- 12,562
- 2,517
I mean, we shouldn't list unaccepted calcs. Though all of the main calcs used for scaling have been accepted anyway so it doesn't really affect much, just a bit of clean-up really.
- 17,215
- 12,655
- Thread starter
- #217
If they are unaccepted then they need reviewing, if they are rejected then yeah sure go ahead. If they are accepted but not used then please make a blog and put them there as i don't want to lose them by accident.
- 12,562
- 2,517
I think we should link supporting calcs in a separate tabber to make the page look neater. As shown here.
I'll keep a track of unaccepted calcs in the same sandbox that aren't joke calcs.
- 15,126
- 6,901
Added the new calcs to the verse, remember to add the ones which still aren't (like Staraptor and Empoleon Rel feats)
- 16,998
- 12,134
Ate we gonna ignore the fact that this calculation needs to be adjusted? DontTalk doesn't agree with a magnitude 9
- 15,126
- 6,901
Rule say that 1 calc member agreeing is enough.
- 16,998
- 12,134
Not if there's disagreement. DontTalk is also like our prime calc member, his takes priority.
- 12,562
- 2,517
Calc members don't really take 'priority'. If there's disagreement, it needs to be discussed in a calc group thread.
- 4,955
- 3,768
How would this feat affect the scaling if it was to be evaluated and accepted
- 16,998
- 12,134
If it's our most knowledgeable calc member then yeah, he does. Ant can tell you the same exact thing.
No, DontTalk proved it isn't Magnitude 9 in the blog with citation, so it needs to be adjusted accordingly.
- 15,126
- 6,901
Dude, being his loyal puppy doesn't help here. If someone accepted, then it is for the same reason why sysops opinions aren't > mods. Also, DT opinion isn't absolute.
- 16,998
- 12,134
First of all, don't call me his loyal puppy. I'm not an animal and I'd appreciate it if you didn't address me as such. Secondly, he provided factual evidence.
- 4,955
- 3,768
- 12,562
- 2,517
All calc members are knowledgeable enough to give judgement on these calcs, hence why they have the role. No one calc member can just outvote another. Again, any disagreement needs to be sorted out in a calc group discussion thread.
- 15,126
- 6,901
First I call whoever I want like whatever I want. Second, if no one agreed with it it's not accepted. Sorry.
Lou_change
He/Him- 10,123
- 5,386
9 was a huge low ball if you read the calc as in literally impossible.
- 16,998
- 12,134
No it doesn't, it needs to be discussed in the blog itself if there's disagreement between two calculations members.
- 16,998
- 12,134
Enjoy the Rule Violations thread.
- 15,126
- 6,901
How to remove 70% of the calcs.
- 12,562
- 2,517
Yes it does, this is how we've always done things. Calc blogs don't notify you when someone responds to your message, and they're far more closed off than a calc group thread. And I doubt it's just between two calc members, since several other calc group members in the thread seemed okay to use the calc.
My main problem though was with the idea that one calc member can out-prioritize another, which is ridiculous. All calc members have equal say.
- 15,126
- 6,901
With this logic if 1 sysop disagrees and 10 thread moderators agrees, a CRT is rejected.
- 16,998
- 12,134
No, we literally don't. That's a case by case basis, calc group thread are only made when theres disagreement regarding stuff such as pixel scaling, different calculations, etc. If the calculation is inherently flawed (we wouldn't open a calc group thread just because of a simple math error.) this is no different.
Read above.
- 12,562
- 2,517
I'm not going to repeat myself again. We do, and it's the main way in which calc disagreements are settled. What you consider to be a "simple maths error" isn't necessarily what it actually is (seems like more of a logic error).
?
- 16,998
- 12,134
That's on you, we evidently don't and I already stated why. This is common knowledge literally everyone on the calc team will tell you.
Similar threads
