Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ah, to live in the north, enjoying the lifestyle of battle and farmingAnt is a Swedish Viking Warrior fighting against the Fascistic temperaments of Bleach fans.
I very much disapprove of the fascist or even Nazi values, combined with anti-western Christophobia, that Tite Kubo has promoted in his Bleach work in general.
He commits genocide multiple times on his own children
If you think about it, no one in Bleach is 100% good except for Orihime and some other characters I'm probably forgetting. Yhwach is the lesser evil when contrasted with the Soul Society.He commits genocide multiple times on his own children
This just doesn't matter when considering the crimes Yhwach commits.It was one of my points, not my whole argument. but yeah Yhwach's self-righteousness makes him less evil than the Soul Society. Think of it like a soldier believing they are serving a righteous cause and committing atrocities, even if the cause is not truly righteous, being considered less evil than a soldier who knows they're doing something wrong but keeps doing it anyway. Morality and evilness can be measured in various ways, two of which are the action itself and the intent/reason behind it. Yhwach genuinely believed that his goal was the best for humanity. He initially pursued this goal for both self-preservation and empathy/compassion for the living, which he acquired through absorbing the memories of countless people who feared death.
Nah, he's still evil, but not as much as the Soul Society.in short, the idea of yhwach wasn't bad. however he could have avoided it but I personally wouldn't consider him a bad guy
Which genocide are you talking about? As far as I remember, the only thing he did that can be considered genocide and not just mass murder is the invasion of Soul Society. If it's the invasion of Soul Society, it is still less evil than all the other genocides the Soul Society committed, as it has the explanation of both being a war and revenge, unlike most of the Soul Society genocides, which are unjustifiable. Although the Quincy genocide by the Soul Society has a "justification" it's a very flimsy one. So, in that case, Yhwach would still be the lesser EVIL.This just doesn't matter when considering the crimes Yhwach commits.
Every genocidal asshole does it self righteous reasons, it doesn't make them better than people who have those same reasons, but are less pretentious about it like Seireitei. Yhwachs motivations aren't convincing reasons as to why he's somehow a lesser evil.
The AuschwalenWhich genocide are you talking about? As far as I remember, the only thing he did that can be considered genocide and not just mass murder is the invasion of Soul Society. If it's the invasion of Soul Society, it is still less evil than all the other genocides the Soul Society committed, as it has the explanation of both being a war and revenge, unlike most of the Soul Society genocides, which are unjustifiable. Although the Quincy genocide by the Soul Society has a "justification" it's a very flimsy one. So, in that case, Yhwach would still be the lesser EVIL.
Disclaimer: I'm not saying that the invasion of Soul Society is right; I'm just pointing out that it at least has an explanation, which to some might be plausible. This is in contrast to the Soul Society's decisions like "let's kill all Mod Souls just because," "let's kill Fullbringers so we can get the Reio fragments," "instead of exploring 100 other options, let's just kill the Quincy because they don't want to stop killing their natural enemies, which are poisonous to them," and "let's not even agree to the Soken's proposal since it's better to let the Quincy die." Even in filler episodes, they commit genocides for no reason.
That totally doesn't sound similar to any notable part of literally the most famous genocide.The Auschwalen
Unfortunately, that doesn't fall under genocide according to Oxford; only mass murder.The Auschwalen
Zaraki's "past deeds of thrill killing" were when he was a literal child being hunted down by ghost cops.I have in fact read half of the Bleach series, and Zaraki is per definition far too amoral and bloodthirsty to qualify as a genuinely good character with very high degrees of empathy, conscience, compassion, and moral conduct. Even an average human does not qualify as good, just neutral, and Zaraki's past deeds of thrill-killing slaughter makes him considerably worse than an average human.
Unfortunately, that doesn't fall under genocide according to Oxford; only mass murder.
He literally did it because they were Quincy, since the Quincy were the ones with his power in them.Unfortunately, that doesn't fall under genocide according to Oxford; only mass murder.
Yhwach didn't kill the Quincy just because, and he didn't do it with the goal of exterminating them; he did it to regain his power. Also, he didn't kill them because they are Quincy, but because it was the way to regain his power. So it fails to meet the criteria of the definition.
The action is equally evil, but the intent is not as malicious as killing them out of hatred or something similar.It was one of my points, not my whole argument. but yeah Yhwach's self-righteousness makes him less evil than the Soul Society. Think of it like a soldier believing they are serving a righteous cause and committing atrocities, even if the cause is not truly righteous, being considered less evil than a soldier who knows they're doing something wrong but keeps doing it anyway. Morality and evilness can be measured in various ways, two of which are the action itself and the intent/reason behind it. Yhwach genuinely believed that his goal was the best for humanity. He initially pursued this goal for both self-preservation and empathy/compassion for the living, which he acquired through absorbing the memories of countless people who feared death.
"The deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular race or nation."Unfortunately, that doesn't fall under genocide according to Oxford; only mass murder.
This is one of the mostUnfortunately, that doesn't fall under genocide according to Oxford; only mass murder.
The auschwalen was an ethnic cleansing in which Quincy who weren't pure enough were systematically murdered. If that isn't a genocide then who tf knows dude.
But it was not a hate crime, and he didn't kill them because he wanted to exterminate a group of people; he did it to regain his power.He literally did it because they were Quincy, since the Quincy were the ones with his power in them.
The auschwalen was an ethnic cleansing in which Quincy who weren't pure enough were systematically murdered. If that isn't a genocide then who tf knows dude.
"The deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular race or nation."
the deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or group.
The intent was not to kill them just because they were 'impure' but because 'pure' Quincy are a rarity that could not be disposed of, so they were the alternative. (It was not a hate crime.)was an ethnic cleansing in which Quincy who weren't pure enough were systematically murdered.
But it was not a hate crime, and he didn't kill them because he wanted to exterminate a group of people; he did it to regain his power.
Yhwach ideals towards the Quincy was based on hitlers ideology that’s one of the reason for the Germanic theme the wandereich have. It pretty safe too bet that it was genocideBut it was not a hate crime, and he didn't kill them because he wanted to exterminate a group of people; he did it to regain his power.
The intent was not to kill them just because they were 'impure' but because 'pure' Quincy are a rarity that could not be disposed of, so they were the alternative. (It was not a hate crime.)
His motivation was not to destroy the Quincy; therefore, it's not genocide.
This is one of the mostlooking ass statements I’ve ever seen
The distinction matters in our judicial system and public perception, It also matters a lot depending on how someone measures evil; therefore, it's an important differentiation.
Dude do you not think racial purity is a motive that qualifies under hate crime?But it was not a hate crime, and he didn't kill them because he wanted to exterminate a group of people; he did it to regain his power.
The intent was not to kill them just because they were 'impure' but because 'pure' Quincy are a rarity that could not be disposed of, so they were the alternative. (It was not a hate crime.)
His motivation was not to destroy the Quincy; therefore, it's not genocide.
That's never confirmed. The manga implies they fell into eugenics due to the rarity of pure Quincy post-genocide. The only ideology you can attribute to Yhwach is the 'unnecessary Quincy' one, which is not based on eugenics but on usefulness for himself.Yhwach ideals towards the Quincy was based on hitlers ideology that’s one of the reason for the Germanic theme the wandereich have. It pretty safe too bet that it was genocide
YesDude do you not think racial purity is a motive that qualifies under hate crime?
No, the distinction is on intent, as I've said multiple times. He didn't want to destroy a very specific type of Quincy; he wanted to regain his power. Since the specific group of Quincy was less useful to him, due to the whole power dilution thing (which is showcased in Blut), it shows that it was not due to 'hate.' This is further emphasized when he used Auswählen on all of Quincy. It implies he never did it because of racial superiority but due to a utilitarian approach, which in this case would not be classified as a hate crime.Nobody cares about the idea of destroying a race entirely when talking about genocide. Yhwach is trying to destroy a very specific type of Quincy, which would still be a genocide when understood by everyone. You can commit genocide on a sect of a larger race for example without intending to destroy the entire larger race. You're just misunderstanding the definition.