Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So if I look at every single profile in bleach I better see resistance to ice manipulation/heat manipulation on everyone toshiro fought and everyone with more Ap then him because bleach characters have always avoided being frozen. And we are to assume toshiro can't freeze the characters higher than him permanently. I'm not even talking about Adult toshiro as I think he's conceptual. This is just a verse specific issue like hakai in dragon ball
It's not the same level of resistance to your actual insides being frozen, but regardless, sure. I'm fine with Haribel having resistance to low temperatures, as she doesn't seem to have any freeze burns on herLiterally irrelevant as creating ice around them would lower their temperature lmfao
You'll likely need to explain what the big word "equivocation" means to Raven.But surely you understand that even if that's true, that's not a rebuttal to his claim?
That's where the equivocation error is being made.
Unlike Arc and Arcker, I don't have the patience to deal with you. If you believe that's an L for me, I don't care.Here we go again that's an L on you buddy
@Twisted_Little_Raven use Equivocation in a sentenceYou'll likely need to explain what the big word "equivocation" means to Raven.
He doesn't need to refute a non sequitur. Since they don't logically follow the argument preceding them.No you need to make a counter argument or stop talking
You gotta stop this nerdy ass verbiage .He doesn't need to refute a non sequitur. Since they don't logically follow the argument preceding them
Idc, I gave her links to the big scary words and what they mean, she's got access to the internet. At this point any ignorance is just on her. I'm not losing any sleep if she can't comprehend what a non sequitur is, hell I explain what it is in the sentence following my usage of the word in the post you quoted.You gotta stop this nerdy ass verbiage.
It's clear you're not going to get anywhere if you explaining shit with language she doesn't get.
I mean why engage with her at all if you don't at least want to change her views.Idc, I gave her links to the big scary words and what they mean, she's got access to the internet. At this point any ignorance is just on her. I'm not losing any sleep if she can't comprehend what a non sequitur is, hell I explain what it is in the sentence following my usage of the word in the post you quoted.
I find it entertainingI mean why engage with her at all if you don't at least want to change her views.
Nobody else agrees with her, or needs to be convinced why.
I understand that. I just think you shouldn't complain when your conversations with her devolve into shit when that's the entire goal of conversating with her.I find it entertaining
Am I complaining rn? I don't think I am. I am engaging in Raven fully understanding that she is going to go on some tirade about "Arc's debate tactics" and "y'all are just meatriding Arc".I understand that. I just think you shouldn't complain when your conversations with her devolve into shit when that's the entire goal of conversating with her.
Okie dokie. Continue then.Am I complaining rn? I don't think I am. I am engaging in Raven fully understanding that she is going to go on some tirade about "Arc's debate tactics" and "y'all are just meatriding Arc".
Lol if I make a thread you gotta reply then hmmmmI understand that. I just think you shouldn't complain when your conversations with her devolve into shit when that's the entire goal of conversating with her.
And I know engaging with you will get me jumped by Arcker guac n deceivedAm I complaining rn? I don't think I am. I am engaging in Raven fully understanding that she is going to go on some tirade about "Arc's debate tactics" and "y'all are just meatriding Arc".
I'm using normal debate lingo, because we are having a debate. You've got the internet, google the big words you didn't learn.Or you can be a normal person and use normal words instead of trying to sound smart in a debate.
Me personally, when I come across a phrase or word I don't know, I google the definition. Also, your inability to prove your own claims isn't my issue.If you think equivocation is a word people actually use regularly then you're delusional. Yall quite simply have terrible debate tactics. You put yourselves in situations where the opponent has to prove something that can't actually be proven and take that as evidence. Or get them to prove something that doesn't need to be proven.
I haven't quite stated my thoughts on Bazz and whether or not he used Blut and the temperature resistance enhancements Blut grants in the instance of mitigating Yama's Shikai flame aura. I just said that resisting the heat of Yama's flames isn't inherent grounds to scale given heat hax resistance is a thing. Whether or not he used Blut or not isn't really important here, since it could just be that Bazz has innate heat resistance without Blut if you wanna go down that road.The whole Ichibei not being sensed thing told me all I need to know. Then I say Bazz b didn't use blut but automatically assume so now i have to prove people use blut when we assume characters already did in majority of situations where we shouldn't. Y'all are impossible to deal with because of your debate tactic.
Yeah I've lost debates to intelligent people. But it's sweet of you to think I've never lost. I provided you with links to what a lot of those words mean, your refusal to click those links is a fault of your own ignorance.Nobody cares about your nerdy words u use to save yourself in a debate to prove you're always right. Has Arc ever lost one? No because his debate tactics ensure he cant. So either make an argument or stop talking. Ad hominem, Non sequitur, equivocation, Hatchet's razor?? WTF is even that.
Playing by the rules sure is scummy. What a ludicrous thing to say, imagine you're losing a game of pick up basketball to someone, and your cope is "they played by the rules".Basically this boils down to, the people I'm debating with can't actually lose a debate because they use scummy tactics to ensure nothing they are saying on a technical standpoint is wrong.
Yup.Utterly ridiculous
If you want to debate against me or discuss something where they cannot intervene than use DMs. This is a public forum, anyone can respond to any message in the general thread, and anyone can not respond to any of those messages.And I know engaging with you will get me jumped by Arcker guac n deceived
Finally, someone agrees with my objectively correct take.you may be on to something
Not normal debate lingo at all. Been doing it longer than youI'm using normal debate lingo, because we are having a debate. You've got the internet, google the big words you didn't learn.
Yea but there are people who simply use normal words so they are better understoodMe personally, when I come across a phrase or word I don't know, I google the definition. Also, your inability to prove your own claims isn't my issue.
Me personally I'm not reading all that since the topic isn't about that. I brought him up to make up a point not here to debate Bazz b equals shikai yamaI haven't quite stated my thoughts on Bazz and whether or not he used Blut and the temperature resistance enhancements Blut grants in the instance of mitigating Yama's Shikai flame aura. I just said that resisting the heat of Yama's flames isn't inherent grounds to scale given heat hax resistance is a thing. Whether or not he used Blut or not isn't really important here, since it could just be that Bazz has innate heat resistance without Blut if you wanna go down that road.
To me too and I'm smarter than youYeah I've lost debates to intelligent people. But it's sweet of you to think I've never lost. I provided you with links to what a lot of those words mean, your refusal to click those links is a fault of your own ignorance.
You aren't playing basketball you're playing tennisPlaying by the rules sure is scummy. What a ludicrous thing to say, imagine you're losing a game of pick up basketball to someone, and your cope is "they played by the rules".
See this wasn't why I said this. I said this because I know what I'm getting into by debating you since you have your own expectations when you argue meYup.
If you want to debate against me or discuss something where they cannot intervene than use DMs. This is a public forum, anyone can respond to any message in the general thread, and anyone can not respond to any of those messages.
"Strawman" is a common debate term. The fact you don't know that speaks towards your lack of knowledge, not my surplus.Not normal debate lingo at all. Been doing it longer than you
The only one struggling to understand me is you.Yea but there are people who simply use normal words so they are better understood
AightMe personally I'm not reading all that since the topic isn't about that. I brought him up to make up a point not here to debate Bazz b equals shikai yama
I've never lost a debate to youTo me too and I'm smarter than you
Uh aightYou aren't playing basketball you're playing tennis
Do you get fulfillment out of losing these debates?See this wasn't why I said this. I said this because I know what I'm getting into by debating you since you have your own expectations when you argue me
Nah I winDo you get fulfillment out of losing these debates?
By your own concession, I've never lost a debate, meaning you conceded I beat you in those debates. CornballNah I win
Your face issa cornballBy your own concession, I've never lost a debate, meaning you conceded I beat you in those debates. Cornball
Your face issa cornball
Are you proud fatherRaven still racking up Ws I see
You're possibly the goofiest dude I have ever meant. You're made of confetti and have silly string as blood.I got patience plus she can always be reprogrammed
Why you edit me like that? CrazyYou're possibly the goofiest dude I have ever meant. You're made of confetti and have silly string as blood.