- 811
- 433
At the moment, Baldi's attack power is justified with the following:
Wall level (Able to one-shot the player, who can survive getting rammed into a wall at high speed by 1st Prize and Gotta Sweep)
However, there's a problem with this assumption: Baldi is not shown actually attacking the player. He merely jumpscares them, sending them to a loading screen. If Baldi were portrayed as violent or bloodthirsty, or the ramifications of getting a problem incorrect was actually explicitly given (or even strongly implied), I wouldn't see a problem here; but to the best of my knowledge Baldi's only depicted as being especially strict and the only implication of punishment is that he's gonna smack the player with a ruler. As far as we know, he merely painfully smacks the player character with his ruler a few times upon catching them and they're otherwise completely fine, like school teachers used to do. That's not unreasonable as an assumption, is it?
While Wall level Baldi isn't unreasonable given the durability of the characters, I don't feel like it's well justified at this moment, since Baldi never actually attacks anything in the gameexcept his own hand, but let's not even try to use that for an AP feat guys. Wait I actually ended up using a calc of the ruler slap as a low-end feat, disregard the former joke about it.
EDIT:
Wall level (Able to one-shot the player, who can survive getting rammed into a wall at high speed by 1st Prize and Gotta Sweep)
However, there's a problem with this assumption: Baldi is not shown actually attacking the player. He merely jumpscares them, sending them to a loading screen. If Baldi were portrayed as violent or bloodthirsty, or the ramifications of getting a problem incorrect was actually explicitly given (or even strongly implied), I wouldn't see a problem here; but to the best of my knowledge Baldi's only depicted as being especially strict and the only implication of punishment is that he's gonna smack the player with a ruler. As far as we know, he merely painfully smacks the player character with his ruler a few times upon catching them and they're otherwise completely fine, like school teachers used to do. That's not unreasonable as an assumption, is it?
While Wall level Baldi isn't unreasonable given the durability of the characters, I don't feel like it's well justified at this moment, since Baldi never actually attacks anything in the game
EDIT:
Additionally, The Player should probably be changed to "At least Below Average Human level, Wall level with BSoDA" since they also never attack anybody in the game (outside of using BSoDA).Jaften said:To be honest, I would revise the current Baldi profile to say:
"At least Below Average Human level (Produces this much energy slapping a ruler against his palm), likely Wall level (Should be comparable to 1st Prize and Gotta Sweep, however he never actually attacks anything in the game)"
Does that look reasonable?