Ask about tier 1-A and above to 0

[Mithra]

I want to ask because I don't seem to understand from the explanations of the people around me.

Some say that 1-A is a character that is transcend the expansion of the hierarchy, transcend infinite dimensions, transcend space-time conceptually, and blah blah blah. Then somewhere higher above baseline 1-A would be 1-A+ or 1x above baseline 1-A, and, trancend the 1-A layer indefinitely would qualify for H1-A.

If this is true, is going beyond two overlapping infinite hierarchies with infinite transcendence like this enough to qualify as tier 0/baseline 0?

 

[NIK_FARIS]

I want to ask because I don't seem to understand from the explanations of the people around me.

Some say that 1-A is a character that is transcend the expansion of the hierarchy, transcend infinite dimensions, transcend space-time conceptually, and blah blah blah. Then somewhere higher above baseline 1-A would be 1-A+ or 1x above baseline 1-A, and, trancend the 1-A layer indefinitely would qualify for H1-A.

If this is true, is going beyond two overlapping infinite hierarchies with infinite transcendence like this enough to qualify as tier 0/baseline 0?

I am not sure whether your last statement refer to starting from tier low 1-c or direct starting from high 1-A. For the former, it would just be (countable infinite) high 1-B or low 1A assuming it beyond the infinite hierarchy.

 

[Kowalski]

I want to ask because I don't seem to understand from the explanations of the people around me.

Some say that 1-A is a character that is transcend the expansion of the hierarchy, transcend infinite dimensions, transcend space-time conceptually, and blah blah blah. Then somewhere higher above baseline 1-A would be 1-A+ or 1x above baseline 1-A, and, trancend the 1-A layer indefinitely would qualify for H1-A.

If this is true, is going beyond two overlapping infinite hierarchies with infinite transcendence like this enough to qualify as tier 0/baseline 0?1-A is simple term transcends every possible extensions from tier below.

Tier 1-A in simple term; it transcends every possible extensions from tier below, whether it’s hierarchy, existence, concept, or whatever reserving that form of transcendence.

Secondly, the (+) label is used after characters whose existence is infinite layers above 1-A baseline in any form, and above. Likewise, beings that exceeded all possible supplements from 1-A would be placed at High 1-A, and this process is repeated to tier 0.

 

[Mithra]

Tier 1-A in simple term; it transcends every possible extensions from tier below, whether it’s hierarchy, existence, concept, or whatever reserving that form of transcendence.

Secondly, the (+) label is used after characters whose existence is infinite layers above 1-A baseline in any form, and above. Likewise, beings that exceeded all possible supplements from 1-A would be placed at High 1-A, and this process is repeated to tier 0.

Does a 1-A hierarchy to a 0 hierarchy mean that there are 4 hierarchies that actually have far-reaching gaps? Let's say each hierarchy has layers with infinite R-F transcendence, and each hierarchy will consider the one below it to be nothing more than a fictional story, is it like this?

 

[Cat275]

I want to ask because I don't seem to understand from the explanations of the people around me.

Some say that 1-A is a character that is transcend the expansion of the hierarchy, transcend infinite dimensions, transcend space-time conceptually, and blah blah blah. Then somewhere higher above baseline 1-A would be 1-A+ or 1x above baseline 1-A, and, trancend the 1-A layer indefinitely would qualify for H1-A.

If this is true, is going beyond two overlapping infinite hierarchies with infinite transcendence like this enough to qualify as tier 0/baseline 0?

(1st.)most of the things said here are not true
(2nd.)no it will not qualify as tier 0.

 

[Cat275]

(1st.)most of the things said here are not true
(2nd.)no it will not qualify as tier 0.

Well technically it depends on context.

 

[Savior]

Does a 1-A hierarchy to a 0 hierarchy mean that there are 4 hierarchies that actually have far-reaching gaps? Let's say each hierarchy has layers with infinite R-F transcendence, and each hierarchy will consider the one below it to be nothing more than a fictional story, is it like this?

Considering there are no use of higher infinites (Set Theory)

Lets say you have a 1A hierarchy(1)

Then there is another hierarchy(2) which transcends this 1A hierarchy (r>f)

The lowest layer of this hierarchy would be 1 layer into Outer , 2nd layer would be 2 layers into Outer and so on , the whole structure would be Outer+(inf layers into outer)

Then another hierarchy(3) in which the first layer itself transcends the previous structure , the lowest layer would be baseline High Outer , 2nd would be 1 layer into High Outer, 3rd would be 2 layers into it and so on


A structue(4) transcending it would be Baseline 0



(1) = Baseline Outer
(2) = Inf layers into Outer(Outer+)
(3) = Inf layers into H1A (1st layer is Baseline H1A)
(4) = Baseline Boundless


This could be done in 3 hierarchies if the first layer of the 2nd hierarchy is Baseline Outer ,as in just making the 1st layer of (2) Baseline Outerversal, 2nd layer being 1 layer into Outer etc

Similar to how Baseline H1A and Inf Layers into it is in the same Hierarchy(3)

 

[Iiliminal]

correct me if im wrong but outerversal is basically like no matter how many transcendences you have you will always fail to reach my lvl

 

[Savior]

correct me if im wrong but outerversal is basically like no matter how many transcendences you have you will always fail to reach my lvl

I think thats more high outerversal, no matter how many times you transcend Outerversal, you'll just be Outer+

To be H1A, you need to transcend an Outer+ Hierarchy iirc


Outerversal is level that completely exceeds Low 1-A structures to the same degree that they exceed High 1-B and below

Basically 1 complete transcendece from Infinite Hierarchy = Low 1A

1 complete Transcendece from Low1A = 1A


Inf Complete Transcendece from 1A = 1A+


1 complete transcendece from 1A+ /H1A

 

[Cat275]

Not really no. Standards have changed and to be H1-A you need to exceed any 1-A+ hierarchy including it's uncountable infinity counterparts. (Aleph-1→Aleph-Omega→Aleph omega + 1 and etc)

So a normal R>F over 1-A+ isn't enough.

 

[Savior]

I get the Math one but can u explain it in transcendence?

 

[Cat275]

Bassically by R>F reaching H1-A is impossible without math concepts, we know that R>F over 1-A+ is still 1-A+ (Aleph Omega + 1) and R>F over the R>F in question is just higher into 1-A+ again if you have infinite R>F's over ot then it's just something like Aleph omega + omega (and limit hierarchies exist) and such this is still part of uncountability. to reach H1-A without specific math context you need to add more context than just R>F (like feats of inaccessibillity and apophism over it etc.).

In short R>F only (with no specific math context) will likely not be able to achieve H1-A.

 

[Savior]

Bassically by R>F reaching H1-A is impossible without math concepts, we know that R>F over 1-A+ is still 1-A+ (Aleph Omega + 1) and R>F over the R>F in question is just higher into 1-A+ again if you have infinite R>F's over ot then it's just something like Aleph omega + omega (and limit hierarchies exist) and such this is still part of uncountability. to reach H1-A without specific math context you need to add more context than just R>F (like feats of inaccessibillity and apophism over it etc.).

In short R>F only (with no specific math context) will likely not be able to achieve H1-A.

What tf...


But what if a state that a 1-A+ structure will never reach a different structure ?

 

[Cat275]

What tf...


But what if a state that a 1-A+ structure will never reach a different structure ?

Rather vague, would probably need more context for that.

 

[Savior]

Rather vague, would probably need more context for that.

Yeah thought so


Btw , could you tell me a buch few about SCP and World of Darkness cosmology?

How high into 0 are they?

What is the top Math in it?

 

[Cat275]

Yeah thought so


Btw , could you tell me a buch few about SCP and World of Darkness cosmology?

How high into 0 are they?

What is the top Math in it?

It's probably better if you ask it in the discussion thread instead.

Here also this.

 

[Savior]

It's probably better if you ask it in the discussion thread instead.

Here also this.

Alr thanks, what are their current tiers btw?

 

[Cat275]

Alr thanks, what are their current tiers btw?

The top tiers are tier 0.

 

[Savior]

The top tiers are tier 0.

I mean, how much into it?

 

[Cat275]

I mean, how much into it?

People say it's inaccessible layers into it.

 

[Savior]

People say it's inaccessible layers into it.

What in the..how