• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Anti-Bullying Furry VS Profile Deletion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well if were removing every haxless 10-C - 9-B then I think thats a revision for another time.

Though i dont see a problem with cool cat. He is the main character of his own series and were not trying to add anybody else from the verse (normal people) here, on top of him having a decent level of fighting capability. It is a good enough reason to keep him especially if he is requested (albeit for meme purposes).
 
Zark2099 said:
Haxless 10-Bs, not extending it to 10-C or 9-C or whatevs
Click to expand...
Yeah, we have Composite Human for the 10-B fights.

But I should note that they should be removed if they have no special characteristics and they're basically just a normal human in every sense.

For example, Kira (Light) shouldn't be removed due to his massive Big Wrinkled brain.
 
But this is an indexing wiki tho. That would be like removing the word defenestrate or picayune from the dictionary.
 
GoCommitDi said:
"suing" a wiki is possible? lol what
Click to expand...
You can, under tort law (btw, this is the UK law) if it is reasonably foreseeable that damage may occur to a parties brand or name when it is not wholely true, then they can be found to be liable.

There is multiple factors which go into this such as Standard of Care and if a wiki would fair, just and reasonably owe a duty of care.
 
So since the profile has been restored, should we close this thread?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top