Angels Can't Clock Out: The Divine Job Security of DB's Type 8 Immortals + Two other abilities

[AizenBankai09]

Double bump

 

[ChoursDropoff]

Bump

 

[AizenBankai09]

Triple bumps

 

[Killerdrone123]

Bump we need to get this concluded

 

[RoninSlayer200]

i agree with this

 

[ChoursDropoff]

Bump

 

[Gilad_Hyperstar]

I agree with this

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

Looks alright.

 

[AizenBankai09]

Looks alright.

Thank you so much for your input!

 

[ActuallySpaceMan42]

From what I understand it does look like they are Immortal as long as they follow the laws in question, with the Grand Priest simply erasing Merus before the law had the chance to. At the same time, this would seem to imply that the GP has the ability to just ignore the laws assumed protection. One could argue that since Merus broke the law, he was no longer being protected by it, but Whis specifically says breaking the law is the only method by which they could be removed from existence.

 

[Killerdrone123]

From what I understand it does look like they are Immortal as long as they follow the laws in question, with the Grand Priest simply erasing Merus before the law had the chance to. At the same time, this would seem to imply that the GP has the ability to just ignore the laws assumed protection. One could argue that since Merus broke the law, he was no longer being protected by it, but Whis specifically says breaking the law is the only method by which they could be removed from existence.

So you agree with it?

 

[Killerdrone123]

Bump

 

[ChoursDropoff]

I agree

 

[Killerdrone123]

Bump

 

[AizenBankai09]

Bump

 

[Jaakor48]

1 more staff agree is needed here right?

 

[AizenBankai09]

1 more staff agree is needed here right?

We still don't have a clear response from spaceman, so I guess two more staff agreements are still needed.

 

[Jaakor48]

We still don't have a clear response from spaceman, so I guess two more staff agreements are still needed.

I mean , he basically agreed with the OP's premise and even made a rebuke on a potential argument against it, so I assumed he counted as an agree

But if not, then yea, two more

 

[AizenBankai09]

A quick question if this gets accepted would we need another crt for type 8 negation?

 

[RoninSlayer200]

Daishinkan straight up erased merus due to breaking angel law so yeah, he gets type 8 immortality negation and we probably need another crt for that

 

[Jaakor48]

A quick question if this gets accepted would we need another crt for type 8 negation?

Yes

You could also add it to the OP, while making it clear it's a new addition, and staff can decide to agree/disagree with it while also voting for their type 8, since only 1 staff agree has been seen here

 

[AwkguyDB]

bump

 

[omegabronic]

Btw wouldn't this also make the Angels from the manga have a new weakness "due to the law of the angel lifeform, he/her cannot engage in fights outside of training, else they are erased from existence"

Or something like that?

 

[AizenBankai09]

Btw wouldn't this also make the Angels from the manga have a new weakness "due to the law of the angel lifeform, he/her cannot engage in fights outside of training, else they are erased from existence"

Or something like that?

I think that could work, but the least we could do currently is to wait for more staff input.

 

[AizenBankai09]

Guys I have added two other abilities in the op please check them out, and let me hear your thoughts

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

What is the current topic now?

 

[AizenBankai09]

What is the current topic now?

Regarding immortality type 8 and now I added two other abilities exclusive to the grand priest which are Law manipulation and type 8 immortality negation.

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

Looks good then.

 

[AizenBankai09]

Looks good then.

Thank you so much for your input

 

[omegabronic]

I think that could work, but the least we could do currently is to wait for more staff input.

i think you should add my suggestion to the OP, seems like a straighforward conclusion to the rule

 

[AizenBankai09]

i think you should add my suggestion to the OP, seems like a straighforward conclusion to the rule

Sure thing!