• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

All-purpose request thread (New forum)

can someone either close this or give there input on it:

 

For the wiki terminologies, can I add Layered Hax among the terminology given how prevalent it is in many versus threads and pages?
 

For the wiki terminologies, can I add Layered Hax among the terminology given how prevalent it is in many versus threads and pages?
Sure.
 
I have a request for the "All purpose request forum" (emphasis on "all request")

And that request is to answer a question (this forum is way faster that the Q&A forum)

Do I need to make a CRT to create a new profile despite the fact that there is no rule stating that you do in the "Editing rule" page as long as its accurate


And I am requesting the answer of the question not asking so it is a request
 
I have a request for the "All purpose request forum" (emphasis on "all request")

And that request is to answer a question (this forum is way faster that the Q&A forum)

Do I need to make a CRT to create a new profile despite the fact that there is no rule stating that you do in the "Editing rule" page as long as its accurate

Profiles for characters that have any statistic or ability that is Low 1-A or above are not allowed to be created unless their reasoning has been evaluated and accepted by the wiki staff via a content revision thread or explanation blog, or if they scale to characters whose reasoning has already been evaluated.
Only those profiles need CRTs to create them, although I think the rule should cover all tier 1 as such but well.

But of course, it is always advisable to create a CRT to ask opinions about the profile you are trying to create.
 
Only those profiles need CRTs to create them, although I think the rule should cover all tier 1 as such but well.

But of course, it is always advisable to create a CRT to ask opinions about the profile you are trying to create.
Thank you
 
This CRT has been approved and thus should be closed.

Additionally, Mine Fujiko should be changed to Fujiko Mine as that was a part of the CRT. It's the correct name order and falls in line with the rest of the verse. (I don't think I'm capable of doing that myself so I'm assuming that's something I ask for here)
 
Mismatch close (my thread).
 
Please check.

this would be the proper thread to promote your CRT. This is for things like opening and locking pages, locking threads, stuff of similar nature.
 

Op has for this to be closed
 
Can someone please closed this? it's a bad match up.
 
Can this versus thread be closed, Akuto Sai is a High 1-A+ smurf:
 
That argument relies on Zeno's LS being unknown and thus incapable of resisting it, however that logic shouldn't really be allowed to float as you'd have to argue that Zeno is weaker than early Dragon Ball characters since characters after the Roshi Training are neg-diffing Sans's LS. While there is no specific yield for Zeno, there's no reason to assume they are that low on the LS scale for the verse.
 
That argument relies on Zeno's LS being unknown and thus incapable of resisting it, however that logic shouldn't really be allowed to float as you'd have to argue that Zeno is weaker than early Dragon Ball characters since characters after the Roshi Training are neg-diffing Sans's LS. While there is no specific yield for Zeno, there's no reason to assume they are that low on the LS scale for the verse.
Then make a CRT that makes his LS “Unknow, at least X” or smth providing feats where Zeno matched said characters in LS. Otherwise the reasons are valid and rematch should be reopened.
 
Gotta throw in my 2 cents on this as while idrc about Sans MUs, this one needs some correction.
That argument relies on Zeno's LS being unknown and thus incapable of resisting it, however that logic shouldn't really be allowed to float as you'd have to argue that Zeno is weaker than early Dragon Ball characters since characters after the Roshi Training are neg-diffing Sans's LS. While there is no specific yield for Zeno, there's no reason to assume they are that low on the LS scale for the verse.
  1. Zeno has no stated weight, and given his size he could be even just 10 kg heavy.
  2. Unknown is just that, a number that cannot be assumed to have any value due to lacking information.
Zeno has no physical feats that suggest him being able to outlift even Kid Goku, especially when he's mostly reliant on hax like TK or EE to do basically anything. If you're against such notion, then you should make a CRT to change Zeno's physical LS, as rn he has nothing suggesting he's that level besides vibes.
 
<_< well that feels like disingenuous arguing
I mean, Sans isn't fighting Roshi, he's fighting Zeno. You cannot just say "he must be above Early DB characters" when the profile does not even say that, it potrays him as being completely featless there so we cannot just assume he can outlift thousands of KG, given that the profile does not potray it as such.

As we've mentioned, you should just make a CRT to change Zeno's profile, as rn Sans' TK is indeed working against him.
 
Gotta throw in my 2 cents on this as while idrc about Sans MUs here, this one needs some correction.

  1. Zeno has no stated weight, and given his size he could be even just 10 kg heavy.
  2. Unknown is just that, a number that cannot be assumed to have any value due to lacking information.
Zeno has no physical feats that suggest him being able to outlift even Kid Goku, especially when he's mostly reliant on hax like TK or EE to do basically anything. If you're against such notion, then you should make a CRT to change Zeno's physical LS, as rn he has nothing suggesting he's that level besides vibes.
Zeno is outright considered the strongest in the verse with nobody having a means of beating him, with higher ki levels being accepted as higher statistics. It just feels weird treating the category like it's literally 0 as it just seems like willfully ignoring other factors.

I'm pretty sure most characters in DB have an unknown rating due to not having a concrete way to place things, while I don't normally have an issue with the LS being ignored because of it we are talking about the actual bottom of the verse for this.
 
Zeno is outright considered the strongest in the verse with nobody having a means of beating him, with higher ki levels being accepted as higher statistics. It just feels weird treating the category like it's literally 0 as it just seems like willfully ignoring other factors.
Zeno isn't even a physical fighter, he's the strongest due to his super strong EE than anything else.
I'm pretty sure most characters in DB have an unknown rating due to not having a concrete way to place things, while I don't normally have an issue with the LS being ignored because of it we are talking about the actual bottom of the verse for this.
Then they should be "Unknown, at least X", as that definitely sounds like they're outdated there. Plus, rn they're Unknown because of having inconsistencies in said LS rather than just lacking feats entirely like Zeno.
 
Then they should be "Unknown, at least X", as that definitely sounds like they're outdated there. Plus, rn they're Unknown because of having inconsistencies in said LS rather than just lacking feats entirely like Zeno.
Agreed and I'm fully aware of the inconsistencies, DB is infamous for it. Gonna look into it and see why there's not an "at least".

realistically anyone in db would destroy zeno cqc
Skill, no doubt, LS however has no evidence for (boy I love unknown LS)
 
The thing is that you should still make a thread to change it, because by the rules Zeno has essentially no usable LS for the fight. You're probably right there, but you cannot just step over the profiles from just vibes, rules be rules man.
Fair, fair, though tbf I haven't seen any written rules on how unknown actually works so I mostly just see those and run with whatever the vibe is with them. Which for Zeno has always felt like "we just don't know where to put him"
 
I might have prematurely closed that. Also, I thought I already reopened it earlier, my bad for not opening it sooner.

Mismatch close (my thread).

Op has for this to be closed
Can someone please closed this? it's a bad match up.
Forgot to say, but this should be all good. 👌
 
Can this please be closed? Thank you!

 
This was removed

When it probably shouldn't have been. The change in tier wouldn't have changed the results of this matchup.


As pointed out here kaneki won despite x5 ap differnce to begin with and running it back even with the changes will end the same. I think this matchup was removed without due diligence or checking the matchup at all. Nothing of substance has changed that would ultimately change the outcome . At the bare minimum the match should hsve been redone if people wanted the result removed/changed. @Mapl3Sy4up https://vsbattles.com/threads/versus-thread-removal-requests-new-forum.107533/post-7151537 asked for the deku matchup to be removed then proceeded to remove a couple other matchups that weren't the deku matchup https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Ryomen_Sukuna?action=history including the sukuna one.

Would it be possible to get it re added. Sorry if not the proper place to ask. The other wiki management threads felt a little out of place
 
Last edited:
This has been implemented so it can now be closed

Note - I would say I implemented it properly, but I don't know how good the descriptions were...
 
Can you please unlock these profiles so I can apply these changes?
 
I feel as though this can be closed now, it has come to a consensus on what is and isn't upgraded

 
I need the page below to be opened for the application of this crt.
 
I need the page below to be opened for the application of this crt.
The crt has been applied, the page can be closed. Thanks for your help.
 
I would like to request a renaming of the following two profiles:
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Sosuke_Aizen
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Ichibē_Hyōsube

Specifically, I'd like to change:
  • Sosuke -> Sousuke"
  • Ichibē -> Ichibe'e"
So in either case, I'd change the macron letters. This change would be in accordance with a similar name change recently adopted on the Bleach Wiki, since those romanizations with macron letters were erroneous.

To briefly explain, the name So-u-suke (惣右介) has clear morpheme boundaries between the different kanji, and morphemes (in this case So-u) are never contracted with a macron when separated by a clear word border like that. It's actually the same reason for why Orihime Inoue is written like that, instead of Inōe. For "Ichibe'e" it's the same deal. Since it's three kanji separated by clear word borders (一兵衛), contracting the long vowel with a macron (ē) would be wrong.

Thank you in advance for your help!
 
Back
Top