• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

All-purpose request thread (New forum)

Move it to Fun and Games please (preferably FC/OC)
 
New uninformed user made stomp match. Please close.
 
New uninformed user made stomp match. Please close.
No-one else is calling it a stomp.
 
Someone said something about having higher durability than that and such.
If a character’s attack potency is eight times greater than the opponent’s durability, the fight is generally considered a one-shot or stomp and no longer a valid matchup. However, if the defending side can endure the attack through hax abilities or other mitigating factors, it would not be classified as a stomp.

Further clarifications can be found here
 
If a character’s attack potency is eight times greater than the opponent’s durability, the fight is generally considered a one-shot or stomp and no longer a valid matchup. However, if the defending side can endure the attack through hax abilities or other mitigating factors, it would not be classified as a stomp.

Further clarifications can be found here
I know. People were talking about it as if there was a genuine fight to be had. We wouldn't typically close threads unless they're definitely stomps.
 
My reaction when nard supps forgot to add this to profiles:

1729680298114



Anyways


This match is over and the results are already on bangs profile but jiraiyas profile is locked

Can somebody open it
 
My reaction when nard supps forgot to add this to profiles:

1729680298114



Anyways


This match is over and the results are already on bangs profile but jiraiyas profile is locked

Can somebody open it
It’s open now
 
Last edited:
May these accepted and applied CRTs please be locked
 
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Black★Rock_Shooter

This doesnt need to exist right? It only includes the same iteration of one character (and their verse). Theres already a disambiguation box above each profile. It should just generally be reserved for the same named characters across different series
Typically the purpose of disambiguation pages is to help find similarly named pages from different verses. If it's one verse but also a large one such as DC or Marvel, that can still have its uses.

This one does seem redundant.
 
Can someone please close this?🙏
Accepted + Implemented.

Thanks!
 
Can their profile be opened for this thread?
 
Can I have permission to edit the calculation page? I've had this Slow Motion Definition Revision concluded for about 2-3 weeks with 5 staff members agreeing to the change for the Slow Motion definition. I was told that should be enough votes and so I was just wantng to edit this line in the Slow Motion section:

"In this case, if a reference object with known speed can be visually confirmed to not have moved even 1 pixel (which requires the feat to happen in a visual media like a comic, movie or animation) one can figure out the timeframe, by saying that it must have been less than the timeframe that the object would have taken to move 1 pixel"

and replace it with this new lines (bolded is the edited part):

"In the case of non-animated visual media, such as Comics, manga, and manhwa, the standards for slow motion are stricter. In this case, if a reference object with known speed can be visually confirmed to not have moved even 1 pixel, with multiple panels of the reference object not moving and preferably different angles of the attack being shown, one can figure out the timeframe, by saying that it must have been less than the timeframe that the object would have taken to move 1 pixel, only two panels is generally not enough to warrant the use of this method. Furthermore, the object of interest needs to be faster than the object of reference. However, if a series is known not to commonly reuse art, exceptions could be made with the multiple-panel usage requirement."
 
Back
Top