-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
All-purpose request thread (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 7,095
- 3,855
Thanks!
- 7,095
- 3,855
Gilad_Hyperstar
He/Him- 11,377
- 4,319
- 167,669
- 76,245
- Thread starter
- #5,245
No problem.
I handled it.
These pages need to have their links updated:
Pages that link to "Zombie (Gakkou Gurashi)" | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 167,669
- 76,245
- Thread starter
- #5,246
The thread has not been inactive for particularly long, and is just a versus thread. If it isn't outdated, you can probably continue.
- 7,095
- 3,855
Thanks!No problem.
I handled it.
These pages need to have their links updated:
Pages that link to "Zombie (Gakkou Gurashi)" | VS Battles Wiki | Fandom
I'll handle it later..
Gilad_Hyperstar
He/Him- 11,377
- 4,319
It also seems like a stomp so it should be closed for that reason, especially since Galacta Knight both one shots Cooler and is far more haxxed than him
- 1,345
- 568
Can you respond to the message I sent you, pl0x
- 7,095
- 3,855
Done!
- 3,707
- 2,719
- 31,350
- 34,083
Locked
- 12,669
- 9,618
This link on the Calculations Introduction page is broken. It doesn't exist anymore.
- 16,137
- 10,667
My thread was unfairly closed, if people dont like the topic, just dont comment in the thread, well, i want the thread open again
Coolboy6
He/Him- 7,434
- 5,993
The thread reached three pages and people were tired of debating in that thread. What did you think would happen?
- 16,137
- 10,667
If they are tired, then just unfollow the thread, thats not even a CRT, there is no need to close it
Coolboy6
He/Him- 7,434
- 5,993
They probably closed it so that things don’t get worse in that thread.
- 16,137
- 10,667
I don't see why would it get worse
Coolboy6
He/Him- 7,434
- 5,993
You never know what could happen. Someone may end up getting rvr’d somehow and the mods probably weren’t willing to take that risk. End of story
- 16,137
- 10,667
If people don't like the topic of the thread, just don't comment in the thread, it's really simple, it shouldnt result in RVR
Coolboy6
He/Him- 7,434
- 5,993
The mods didn’t want anyone else to deal with that thread. Even if they wanted to respond in there
- 16,137
- 10,667
What
Coolboy6
He/Him- 7,434
- 5,993
You do realize there are some people that don’t like dealing with or responding to that thread as much as the mods do.
- 16,137
- 10,667
Yeah, these people just doesnt need to comment in the thread, it's really simple
- 16,137
- 10,667
It wasnt really a mess, it was a productive discussion
Coolboy6
He/Him- 7,434
- 5,993
I fail to see how
- 16,137
- 10,667
Because it was a discussion about the standards/assumed stuff, and it wasnt even a CRT, it was just a simply debate
- 4,746
- 7,773
As someone who read the whole thing through at once it was like the opposite of productive. Both sides had their own argument and both refused to see the other as valid which led to 2 whole pages of back and forth where the same things were said on repeat.
While I do agree it didn’t necessarily have to be closed, it wasn’t really productive either.
While I do agree it didn’t necessarily have to be closed, it wasn’t really productive either.
- 16,137
- 10,667
Well I do saw the discussion as productive, and my point still stands in the thread, because what the wiki was doing was the opposite of ''accuracy'', and nobody gave arguments that proves it
- 4,629
- 1,614
Again, your argument is literally based on the argument of whatever or not soul exists or not and quite frankly, we not here to always apply irl logic to fictional settings which doesn’t always work as intended. Also aside from that, this isn’t even based on solely accuracy anymore than what is being used on assumptions which is baseless unto itself since we have no proof soul exist or don’t exist.
This is the part on where a logical contradiction occurs when it is simply dwells into the more speculative/theoretical situation rather than based on solid facts and do keep in mind, the entire discussion is legitimately based on opinions, not set in stone facts as it also has something to do with metaphysical stuff.
- 16,137
- 10,667
Yeah, thats the argument, in the same way that we don't assume that all verses have ''Alchemy'' from FMA, because thats a thing only to FMA, and since Alchemy is not a proved thing, we cannot assume that it exist to all verses, different than Atoms, that are a real thing, so, obviously, Atoms exist in others verses
Different than others theoretical stuff, like what physics does, Souls does not have any short of evidence, it's purely baseless, it's not a thing that can be assumed to all verses, because it doesnt even have proofs to exist IRL, different than Atoms, its literally a baseless assumption with no evidence to backup outside of ''a lot of people belive''
- 4,629
- 1,614
Using this logic, we might as well give the characters a resistance if not outright immunity to soul manipulation using that kind of assumption as quite frankly I don’t think this is good enough on its own as it legitimately been burden of proof on a verse saying all characters is soulless and doesn’t have a true “soul” per se.
The fact you still hinging on this sole interpretation is a bit frustrating.
- 16,137
- 10,667
Let's see, if a character from FMA can remove Alchemy from someone, but Alchemy is literally only from FMA and its not similar to others powers from others verses, why do we assume that Alchemy removal works in others characters? not even Verse Equalization covers it, so, all others characters that doesnt have similar powers to Alchemy literally have Immunity to Alchemy removal, because Alchemy doesnt exist in others verses, made up thing in a specific verse
its burden of proof to your side, because Souls are philosophical/mythology thing, with no evidence to back up, just because a lot of people belive doesnt means that it exist, so, first you need to prove that Souls exist IRL, so, with that, we can assume that souls exist to all others verses unless stated otherwise, but since souls are not proven, this situation cannot happen
- 16,137
- 10,667
the discussion was happening in the thread that was unfairly closed because some people didnt wanted to debate, except that they don't even need to comment in the thread, so, why even close it?
- 4,629
- 1,614
Alrighty, but this discussion does actually require a Site wide CRT given how this has been going.
