- 14,148
- 7,407
Just seeing everything we've been through is already a complicated job.Well, that seems a way big change to pass, we gonna have to rework a bunch of things, so I don't think will pass.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just seeing everything we've been through is already a complicated job.Well, that seems a way big change to pass, we gonna have to rework a bunch of things, so I don't think will pass.
Well, for Dragon Ball It should't be that complicated of a Job, we can fix It without issue.Just seeing everything we've been through is already a complicated job.
Or you know, Daima is not Canon to Super. The evidence of being Canon is Very weak.If something isn't working, the super has obviously been retconned.
not it didn't? It never had such canon contradictions beforeEverything in its own time, Dragon Ball has always had this
putting words in other peoples mouthsand that doesn't make Dragon Ball Daima a DBH or DBGT in life
"Mere"? Nah, such an ammount of contradictions ARE a stronf argument for it to not be canon to DBS, it is still canon to the Z manga however, so again, don't out words in peoples mouths, mere contradictions do not refute it being canon, at most you should have strong arguments for it not being canon.
No? If it doesn't fit, we won't fitIf something isn't working, the super has obviously been retconned.
Considering that you were completely unable to argue or cover any of the points i made so far... i would say my arguments are far more than "decent", i would dare to say they are "good" argumentsYou are automatically refuted when you say original work made by Akira Toriyama, besides the 12 Kaioshin appearing, try to find decent arguments to say that it is not canon, Omega.
All events of Dragon Ball Daima are linked to the original work, Dragon Ball takes place after the Majin Buu arc, then in the anime it is spoken of the original work of Akira Toriyama and the original plot, and the Kaioshins going to the 12 Universes. These contradictions that you guys brought up could be explained with a retcon, unless Akira Toriyama or anyone who has rights to Dragon Ball comes along and says "Dragon Ball Daima is not canon" no contradictions disprove Daima from being in my timeline of major events.Or you know, Daima is not Canon to Super. The evidence of being Canon is Very weak.
seriosly?the super saiyan 4????????????????????????????????All events of Dragon Ball Daima are linked to the original work, Dragon Ball takes place after the Majin Buu arc, then in the anime it is spoken of the original work of Akira Toriyama and the original plot, and the Kaioshins going to the 12 Universes. These contradictions that you guys brought up could be explained with a retcon, unless Akira Toriyama or anyone who has rights to Dragon Ball comes along and says "Dragon Ball Daima is not canon" no contradictions disprove Daima from being in my timeline of major events.
The "original work" is the OG DB Manga, Super is not the "original work"All events of Dragon Ball Daima are linked to the original work, Dragon Ball takes place after the Majin Buu arc, then in the anime it is spoken of the original work of Akira Toriyama and the original plot,
and the Kaioshins going to the 12 Universes.
elements from one series appearing in another doesn't necessarily mean one is canon to the other, only that those specific elements are canon
again, stop inventing things that no one ever said, Daima IS canon to the OG Manga, it not being canon to Super doesn't make it "not canon"These contradictions that you guys brought up could be explained with a retcon, unless Akira Toriyama or anyone who has rights to Dragon Ball comes along and says "Dragon Ball Daima is not canon" no contradictions disprove Daima from being in my timeline of major events.
Great then less hire that African Shaman and summon the dead spirit of Akira Toriyama to get that answerunless Akira Toriyama or anyone who has rights to Dragon Ball comes along and says "Dragon Ball Daima is not canon" no contradictions disprove Daima from being in my timeline of major events.
Write properly man, i'm not going to answer everything in separate comments, write a text and send it instead of writing a bunch of random things.not it didn't? It never had such canon contradictions before
putting words in other peoples mouths
"Mere"? Nah, such an ammount of contradictions ARE a stronf argument for it to not be canon to DBS, it is still canon to the Z manga however, so again, don't out words in peoples mouths
No? If it doesn't fit, we won't fit
Considering that you were completely unable to argue or cover any of the points i made so far... i would say my arguments are far more than "decent", i would dare to say they are "good" arguments
Ssj4 is canon and Ssj3 Vegeta is too, you guys are so nervous because Daima is canonseriosly?the super saiyan 4????????????????????????????????
Call himGreat then less hire that African Shaman and summon the dead spirit of Akira Toriyama to get that answer
and it does not apper again, and it does not apper again, IS NOT MENTIONED AGAIN.Ssj4 is canon and Ssj3 Vegeta is too, you guys are so nervous because Daima is canon![]()
or hope for our world to be like a magic realism one and the spirits of the dead can move around in our world.Great then less hire that African Shaman and summon the dead spirit of Akira Toriyama to get that answer
Here could give the option to say "haha" in these types of comments.and it does not apper again, and it does not apper again, IS NOT MENTIONED AGAIN.
man, why i will be nervous for something like this?when no one scales to the demon realm
ManHere could give the option to say "haha" in these types of comments.
Hahaand it does not apper again, and it does not apper again, IS NOT MENTIONED AGAIN.
man, why i will be nervous for something like this?when no one scales to the demon realm
I did write properlyWrite properly man
I sent everything in 1 comment tho, i'm not going to answer everything in separate comments
I did write a text, yes, write a text and send it instead of writing a bunch of random things.
I don’t have a real opinion either way, but you aren’t strictly correct. For example, Heroes is post majin buu, references the original dragon ball’s plot, and the 12 universes. It’s not canon. Those factors don’t inherently make something canon to super.All events of Dragon Ball Daima are linked to the original work, Dragon Ball takes place after the Majin Buu arc, then in the anime it is spoken of the original work of Akira Toriyama and the original plot, and the Kaioshins going to the 12 Universes. These contradictions that you guys brought up could be explained with a retcon, unless Akira Toriyama or anyone who has rights to Dragon Ball comes along and says "Dragon Ball Daima is not canon" no contradictions disprove Daima from being in my timeline of major events.
DBH doesn't have what Dragon Ball Daima has, original plot by Akira Toriyama and said to be an original work, it is a continuation of the Majin Buu arc and on top of that it mentions the Kaioshins going to the 12th Universes (showing the origin of the Universe), don't compare canon work with just official, DBH is official and Daima is canon.I don’t have a real opinion either way, but you aren’t strictly correct. For example, Heroes is post majin buu, references the original dragon ball’s plot, and the 12 universes. It’s not canon. Those factors don’t inherently make something canon to super.
Ain’t the manga a bit different from the Anime?When i told you to write properly, it was to stop separating each speech you say into several other things... I'm waiting until this very moment for you to come up with strong arguments for it not being canon, because you only brought up mere retcons that DBS took, just like the person who remade Mr. Kaio's planet in the manga. Dragon Ball has always had a retcon and it's not just today, Daima is still canon for both the DBS manga and the Super anime because it takes place after the Majin Boo arc, there is nothing that refutes this for now, not with mere contradictions that are obviously retcon.
For now, the manga has no adaptation for this arc, so i consider it canon to the super manga and the super anime.Ain’t the manga a bit different from the Anime?
I agree. Retcons can happen.All events of Dragon Ball Daima are linked to the original work, Dragon Ball takes place after the Majin Buu arc, then in the anime it is spoken of the original work of Akira Toriyama and the original plot, and the Kaioshins going to the 12 Universes. These contradictions that you guys brought up could be explained with a retcon, unless Akira Toriyama or anyone who has rights to Dragon Ball comes along and says "Dragon Ball Daima is not canon" no contradictions disprove Daima from being in my timeline of major events.
Online?original plot by Akira Toriyama and said to be an original work, it is a continuation of the Majin Buu arc
To show Luffy that his conditions for canonicity are wrong, because they lead to absurd results. In addition, what would DBH adding every db material have to do with anything.Wait, why DBH is mentioned here?. DBH and most Games in general just slapped every DB materials into its contents so idk why DB Games are relevant in this discussion
He's alive!Greetings, everyone. I hope you're all doing well.
Coming back just to say that daima is really cool, and it does the super saiyan forms justice. Super saiyan 4 is amazing.
didn't they explain that it was cause they found a way to defuse thoWhat about Shin and Kibito not being fused
He didn't use ssj grade 3 against cell either. He had 4 years to consider the pro's and cons of ssj3 and found ssj2 would be more effective. Plus it's not like toriyama isn't immune to plot holes, frieza never training is one of themVegeta not using SSJ3? Trought yeah, he probally gonna be like "Damn, I can't access this power anymore"
i mean.....kinda? It contradicts how hell works then if the pikkon fight is canon but nothing elseWould a flashback panel of Goku going Ssj Kaioken vs Pikkon contradict anything in the "Super Manga"? And I'm talking about the transformation not anything else about that (For those that have a better memory than me regarding the super manga)
Yet Shin said himself he didn't knew how to defuse the earings in the Black arc? And only did so via the Dragon Balls?didn't they explain that it was cause they found a way to defuse tho
My dude, he was MAD and not thinking at all against Beerus... he quite literally wasn't on the state of mind to hold back his power, specially when he needed as much power as possible against BeerusHe didn't use ssj grade 3 against cell either. He had 4 years to consider the pro's and cons of ssj3 and found ssj2 would be more effective.
How's that a plothole?Plus it's not like toriyama isn't immune to plot holes, frieza never training is one of them
Frieza killing all the saiyans was because he was scared of the super saiyans rising up. DBS came around and said if he trained for 4 months he could have soloed all of z, so why didn’t he just ******* do that?How's that a plothole?
That's not a retcon, it's just a facet of Frieza's character. He was already for all intents and purposes at the top of the food chain, why bother going higher? Beerus being the one behind Frieza blowing up Planet Vegeta feels wayyy more like a retcon.Frieza killing all the saiyans was because he was scared of the super saiyans rising up. DBS came around and said if he trained for 4 months he could have soloed all of z, so why didn’t he just ******* do that?
This whole Super Saiyan 4 thing can be explained simply with Goku saying that he can no longer use the transformation (in the same way he told Vegeta at the end of Dragon Ball Super, that he no longer knew how to use his superior instinct, consequently giving him room to relearn it later in the DBS manga), about Super Saiyan 3 it is very simple to explain, as it is an inefficient transformation and requires a lot of energy, it would make much more sense for him to focus on improving Super Saiyan 2.
I think this whole discussion is a hurricane in a teapot.
I dont buy this, he willingly transformed into SSJ4 in the last episode
Odds are, if Super Saiyan 4 is not a form only accessible exclusively through Neva's temporary influence, then the form is inaccessible under normal conditions because the Demon Realm and the outside world operate under different laws of reality; hell, the Demon Realm cannot even be observed by the Supreme Kai's Far-Seeing Arts—its nature is esoteric and bizarre.科学よりも魔法が幅を利かせている。
"Magic exerts greater influence than science."
Yeah, they could explain this problem.This whole Super Saiyan 4 thing can be explained simply with Goku saying that he can no longer use the transformation (in the same way he told Vegeta at the end of Dragon Ball Super, that he no longer knew how to use his superior instinct, consequently giving him room to relearn it later in the DBS manga), about Super Saiyan 3 it is very simple to explain, as it is an inefficient transformation and requires a lot of energy, it would make much more sense for him to focus on improving Super Saiyan 2.
You din't explain Shin and Kibito being defused in Super.I think this whole discussion is a hurricane in a teapot.
Character flaw, lol?Frieza killing all the saiyans was because he was scared of the super saiyans rising up. DBS came around and said if he trained for 4 months he could have soloed all of z, so why didn’t he just ******* do that?