• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

All Purpose Dragon Ball Thread

Just seeing everything we've been through is already a complicated job.
Well, for Dragon Ball It should't be that complicated of a Job, we can fix It without issue.

If something isn't working, the super has obviously been retconned.
Or you know, Daima is not Canon to Super. The evidence of being Canon is Very weak.
 
Everything in its own time, Dragon Ball has always had this
not it didn't? It never had such canon contradictions before

and that doesn't make Dragon Ball Daima a DBH or DBGT in life
putting words in other peoples mouths

, mere contradictions do not refute it being canon, at most you should have strong arguments for it not being canon.
"Mere"? Nah, such an ammount of contradictions ARE a stronf argument for it to not be canon to DBS, it is still canon to the Z manga however, so again, don't out words in peoples mouths

If something isn't working, the super has obviously been retconned.
No? If it doesn't fit, we won't fit

You are automatically refuted when you say original work made by Akira Toriyama, besides the 12 Kaioshin appearing, try to find decent arguments to say that it is not canon, Omega.
Considering that you were completely unable to argue or cover any of the points i made so far... i would say my arguments are far more than "decent", i would dare to say they are "good" arguments
 
Or you know, Daima is not Canon to Super. The evidence of being Canon is Very weak.
All events of Dragon Ball Daima are linked to the original work, Dragon Ball takes place after the Majin Buu arc, then in the anime it is spoken of the original work of Akira Toriyama and the original plot, and the Kaioshins going to the 12 Universes. These contradictions that you guys brought up could be explained with a retcon, unless Akira Toriyama or anyone who has rights to Dragon Ball comes along and says "Dragon Ball Daima is not canon" no contradictions disprove Daima from being in my timeline of major events.
 
All events of Dragon Ball Daima are linked to the original work, Dragon Ball takes place after the Majin Buu arc, then in the anime it is spoken of the original work of Akira Toriyama and the original plot, and the Kaioshins going to the 12 Universes. These contradictions that you guys brought up could be explained with a retcon, unless Akira Toriyama or anyone who has rights to Dragon Ball comes along and says "Dragon Ball Daima is not canon" no contradictions disprove Daima from being in my timeline of major events.
seriosly?the super saiyan 4????????????????????????????????
 
All events of Dragon Ball Daima are linked to the original work, Dragon Ball takes place after the Majin Buu arc, then in the anime it is spoken of the original work of Akira Toriyama and the original plot,
The "original work" is the OG DB Manga, Super is not the "original work"

and the Kaioshins going to the 12 Universes.
elements from one series appearing in another doesn't necessarily mean one is canon to the other, only that those specific elements are canon

These contradictions that you guys brought up could be explained with a retcon, unless Akira Toriyama or anyone who has rights to Dragon Ball comes along and says "Dragon Ball Daima is not canon" no contradictions disprove Daima from being in my timeline of major events.
again, stop inventing things that no one ever said, Daima IS canon to the OG Manga, it not being canon to Super doesn't make it "not canon"
 
unless Akira Toriyama or anyone who has rights to Dragon Ball comes along and says "Dragon Ball Daima is not canon" no contradictions disprove Daima from being in my timeline of major events.
Great then less hire that African Shaman and summon the dead spirit of Akira Toriyama to get that answer
 
not it didn't? It never had such canon contradictions before


putting words in other peoples mouths


"Mere"? Nah, such an ammount of contradictions ARE a stronf argument for it to not be canon to DBS, it is still canon to the Z manga however, so again, don't out words in peoples mouths


No? If it doesn't fit, we won't fit


Considering that you were completely unable to argue or cover any of the points i made so far... i would say my arguments are far more than "decent", i would dare to say they are "good" arguments
Write properly man, i'm not going to answer everything in separate comments, write a text and send it instead of writing a bunch of random things.
 
Write properly man
I did write properly

, i'm not going to answer everything in separate comments
I sent everything in 1 comment tho

, write a text and send it instead of writing a bunch of random things.
I did write a text, yes

The one not making sense is you, if you don't have an answer to give to me, just don't answer, pretending as if what i sent is any different then any of the other answers sent by literally everyone else here will not make anything i said go away or invalidate it
 
All events of Dragon Ball Daima are linked to the original work, Dragon Ball takes place after the Majin Buu arc, then in the anime it is spoken of the original work of Akira Toriyama and the original plot, and the Kaioshins going to the 12 Universes. These contradictions that you guys brought up could be explained with a retcon, unless Akira Toriyama or anyone who has rights to Dragon Ball comes along and says "Dragon Ball Daima is not canon" no contradictions disprove Daima from being in my timeline of major events.
I don’t have a real opinion either way, but you aren’t strictly correct. For example, Heroes is post majin buu, references the original dragon ball’s plot, and the 12 universes. It’s not canon. Those factors don’t inherently make something canon to super.
 
When i told you to write properly, it was to stop separating each speech you say into several other things... I'm waiting until this very moment for you to come up with strong arguments for it not being canon, because you only brought up mere retcons that DBS took, just like the person who remade Mr. Kaio's planet in the manga. Dragon Ball has always had a retcon and it's not just today, Daima is still canon for both the DBS manga and the Super anime because it takes place after the Majin Boo arc, there is nothing that refutes this for now, not with mere contradictions that are obviously retcon.
 
I don’t have a real opinion either way, but you aren’t strictly correct. For example, Heroes is post majin buu, references the original dragon ball’s plot, and the 12 universes. It’s not canon. Those factors don’t inherently make something canon to super.
DBH doesn't have what Dragon Ball Daima has, original plot by Akira Toriyama and said to be an original work, it is a continuation of the Majin Buu arc and on top of that it mentions the Kaioshins going to the 12th Universes (showing the origin of the Universe), don't compare canon work with just official, DBH is official and Daima is canon.
 
When i told you to write properly, it was to stop separating each speech you say into several other things... I'm waiting until this very moment for you to come up with strong arguments for it not being canon, because you only brought up mere retcons that DBS took, just like the person who remade Mr. Kaio's planet in the manga. Dragon Ball has always had a retcon and it's not just today, Daima is still canon for both the DBS manga and the Super anime because it takes place after the Majin Boo arc, there is nothing that refutes this for now, not with mere contradictions that are obviously retcon.
Ain’t the manga a bit different from the Anime?
 
All events of Dragon Ball Daima are linked to the original work, Dragon Ball takes place after the Majin Buu arc, then in the anime it is spoken of the original work of Akira Toriyama and the original plot, and the Kaioshins going to the 12 Universes. These contradictions that you guys brought up could be explained with a retcon, unless Akira Toriyama or anyone who has rights to Dragon Ball comes along and says "Dragon Ball Daima is not canon" no contradictions disprove Daima from being in my timeline of major events.
I agree. Retcons can happen.
 
Wait, why DBH is mentioned here?. DBH and most Games in general just slapped every DB materials into its contents so idk why DB Games are relevant in this discussion
To show Luffy that his conditions for canonicity are wrong, because they lead to absurd results. In addition, what would DBH adding every db material have to do with anything.
 
Would a flashback panel of Goku going Ssj Kaioken vs Pikkon contradict anything in the "Super Manga"? And I'm talking about the transformation not anything else about that (For those that have a better memory than me regarding the super manga)
 
What about Shin and Kibito not being fused
didn't they explain that it was cause they found a way to defuse tho
Vegeta not using SSJ3? Trought yeah, he probally gonna be like "Damn, I can't access this power anymore"
He didn't use ssj grade 3 against cell either. He had 4 years to consider the pro's and cons of ssj3 and found ssj2 would be more effective. Plus it's not like toriyama isn't immune to plot holes, frieza never training is one of them
 
Would a flashback panel of Goku going Ssj Kaioken vs Pikkon contradict anything in the "Super Manga"? And I'm talking about the transformation not anything else about that (For those that have a better memory than me regarding the super manga)
i mean.....kinda? It contradicts how hell works then if the pikkon fight is canon but nothing else
 
didn't they explain that it was cause they found a way to defuse tho
Yet Shin said himself he didn't knew how to defuse the earings in the Black arc? And only did so via the Dragon Balls?

He didn't use ssj grade 3 against cell either. He had 4 years to consider the pro's and cons of ssj3 and found ssj2 would be more effective.
My dude, he was MAD and not thinking at all against Beerus... he quite literally wasn't on the state of mind to hold back his power, specially when he needed as much power as possible against Beerus

Plus it's not like toriyama isn't immune to plot holes, frieza never training is one of them
How's that a plothole?
 
Frieza killing all the saiyans was because he was scared of the super saiyans rising up. DBS came around and said if he trained for 4 months he could have soloed all of z, so why didn’t he just ******* do that?
That's not a retcon, it's just a facet of Frieza's character. He was already for all intents and purposes at the top of the food chain, why bother going higher? Beerus being the one behind Frieza blowing up Planet Vegeta feels wayyy more like a retcon.
 
This whole Super Saiyan 4 thing can be explained simply with Goku saying that he can no longer use the transformation (in the same way he told Vegeta at the end of Dragon Ball Super, that he no longer knew how to use his superior instinct, consequently giving him room to relearn it later in the DBS manga), about Super Saiyan 3 it is very simple to explain, as it is an inefficient transformation and requires a lot of energy, it would make much more sense for him to focus on improving Super Saiyan 2.

I think this whole discussion is a hurricane in a teapot.
 
This whole Super Saiyan 4 thing can be explained simply with Goku saying that he can no longer use the transformation (in the same way he told Vegeta at the end of Dragon Ball Super, that he no longer knew how to use his superior instinct, consequently giving him room to relearn it later in the DBS manga), about Super Saiyan 3 it is very simple to explain, as it is an inefficient transformation and requires a lot of energy, it would make much more sense for him to focus on improving Super Saiyan 2.

I think this whole discussion is a hurricane in a teapot.
I dont buy this, he willingly transformed into SSJ4 in the last episode, he couldn't do the same for UI. If Daima is canon, then there is either a major plothole (which would be disappointing, but certainly not out of reach), or they will pull some "restricted to demon realm / whatever" idea.

I also dont see any point in arguing needlessly over what will happen, waiting 5 days isn't that hard.
 
Last edited:
I dont buy this, he willingly transformed into SSJ4 in the last episode
科学よりも魔法が幅を利かせている。
"Magic exerts greater influence than science."
Odds are, if Super Saiyan 4 is not a form only accessible exclusively through Neva's temporary influence, then the form is inaccessible under normal conditions because the Demon Realm and the outside world operate under different laws of reality; hell, the Demon Realm cannot even be observed by the Supreme Kai's Far-Seeing Arts—its nature is esoteric and bizarre.
 
Last edited:
This whole Super Saiyan 4 thing can be explained simply with Goku saying that he can no longer use the transformation (in the same way he told Vegeta at the end of Dragon Ball Super, that he no longer knew how to use his superior instinct, consequently giving him room to relearn it later in the DBS manga), about Super Saiyan 3 it is very simple to explain, as it is an inefficient transformation and requires a lot of energy, it would make much more sense for him to focus on improving Super Saiyan 2.
Yeah, they could explain this problem.

I doing this joke on the assuption they not gonna explain any of them in the last episode, because we can't know If they will or not.
I think this whole discussion is a hurricane in a teapot.
You din't explain Shin and Kibito being defused in Super.
I g
 
Frieza killing all the saiyans was because he was scared of the super saiyans rising up. DBS came around and said if he trained for 4 months he could have soloed all of z, so why didn’t he just ******* do that?
Character flaw, lol?

After being resurrected, Frieza only began training because, after being thoroughly beaten for the first time by Goku and Future Trunks and being dead for fifteen years, he had grown out of shape, and the only fighters in the entire universe to ever defeat him had grown stronger since then. Even with the potential threat of the Super Saiyan, training was unnecessary then.
 
Back
Top