- 6,273
- 2,696
+ them being unchangeable in nature
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Acausality Type 5 checklist
- Thread starter Theglassman12
- Start date
-
- Tags
- acausality
- Status
- 20,105
- 10,899
- Thread starter
- #122
Bump. Is there anything for World of Darkness that justifies type 5? Because there’s no explanation.
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,455
- 5,234
- 2,322
Ask udl
Dragonite007
He/Him- 7,168
- 3,260
Gan
Gan is the Supreme God and animating spirit of the Dark Tower, being the deity most closely associated with the abstract alignment known as The White. Although the Tower appears to be made of stone and glass, it is actually a living vessel for the spirit of Gan. Just as the ancient myths of...
vsbattles.fandom.com
- 20,105
- 10,899
- Thread starter
- #127
@Udlmaster is there any explanation for the World of Darkness characters having type 5 Acausality?
@Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara sounds like half of the requirements for type 5 tbh.
@Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara sounds like half of the requirements for type 5 tbh.
- 20,105
- 10,899
- Thread starter
- #128
Bump
- 16,006
- 8,253
It was also described as transcending cause and effect by HRE, which was the main justification, and the statement would be Option 3. For characters like HRE and gods in the sea, causality manipulation isn't even special and can be countered, and even much weaker characters have causality manipulation: https://gyazo.com/07a65f34d8d582badf90580d050991e4
His instant death had been stated many times to have no cause and effect relationship.
I think this evidence overall lends credence to the idea that Yogiri could meet all the requirements.
His instant death had been stated many times to have no cause and effect relationship.
I think this evidence overall lends credence to the idea that Yogiri could meet all the requirements.
Last edited:
- 18,393
- 14,323
I guess the point is there are no anti-feats to his nature, not that is required to have a statement since this is arbitrary requirement by us.
- 20,105
- 10,899
- 16,006
- 8,253
There were statements about fate, plot, and the like being less than a joke from trying to affect its avatar and still existing at the end of everything, lending to it being unchangeable with additional contexts from characters like CRE and cause and effect being no show from it; the statements were made by Aio which would be Option 2 since she is an expert on the topic, at least; the like would include acausality given the context of CRE and Aio.
"That is a dead end.
That is the ending point for the fate of each and everything, and there's nothing beyond that. The end of everything has assumed the form of a human being.
It is precisely because that is 'The End', that thing would be present till the very end of everything in existence. It is impossible for anything to go beyond that.
In a front of such a thing, Fate, Plot, and the like are less than a joke. It would be the definition of idiocy to even think of fighting such an existence.
Last edited:
- 20,105
- 10,899
- Thread starter
- #133
Can I see scans of this?
- 1,536
- 1,948
I'm not a supporter of the verse however I have that scan from the manga. Hope it helps and does not derail. I apologize if it's the case.
- 20,105
- 10,899
- Thread starter
- #135
Yeah that doesn’t really tell me much on it being unchangeable, just that plot and fate wouldn’t affect them.
- 18,393
- 14,323
We require input from DT regarding this issue. I believe it's not up to a single staff member to determine its eligibility, especially considering that an Admin is contesting it. Moreover, the thread was created and received agreement from multiple staff members. Essentially, I don't think it's necessary for the author to provide a direct statement if the context is consistent and doesn't present any contradictory evidence.
The requirement added by everything12 is solely to address the presence of any anti-feats that may exist.
The requirement added by everything12 is solely to address the presence of any anti-feats that may exist.
- 5,387
- 4,297
This is the reasoning of a profile that currently has a CRT ongoing, there was a disagreement on if it was valid.
Acausality (Type 5; Things' like causality and fate exist as a part of the long river of time. So in areas where space and time are close to being destroyed, matter becomes static, causality becomes frozen, and the beings in such places are practically non-existent, unable to be attacked in any way. Only by time starting again can one effectively interact with them. Gao Chuan has to create avatars that can interact with such beings, since his true form directly transcends time and space)
Acausality (Type 5; Things' like causality and fate exist as a part of the long river of time. So in areas where space and time are close to being destroyed, matter becomes static, causality becomes frozen, and the beings in such places are practically non-existent, unable to be attacked in any way. Only by time starting again can one effectively interact with them. Gao Chuan has to create avatars that can interact with such beings, since his true form directly transcends time and space)
Last edited:
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,455
We don't just assume something exists in a state that is unable to be changed unless it's been stated or implied as such. If someone with sufficient range and NPI tried to interact with Yogiri's true form, there's nothing indicating that they still couldn't do it, so there's no basis for type 5.
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,455
Do you have a link to the CRT? This looks like valid type 5 to me.
- 5,387
- 4,297
- 18,393
- 14,323
This is bad argument because in fact, you can always counter someone's acausality type 5. There is nothing guarantee someone absolute untouchablity and we have agreed with that in the previous thread (specially that Ultima has said that). If plot and fate can't even affect him, this is pretty much some sort of implication. The problem is, you don't even accept this implication does not make the argument nonexistent.
Also, I am not here to engage with you, so please, no need to continue the discussion with me. My point remains.
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,455
"This character is resistant to plothax and fatehax, so obviously they exist in a state devoid of any and all change" is quite the stretch, Dread. As I said before, if someone has the range and NPI necessary, Yogiri's acausality won't stop him from getting his ass beat, which kinda disproves type 5 acausality.
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,455
Ah yeah, that's stupid. What you have is very explicitly type 5; This made up requirement of transcending all possible causal systems is dumb as hell.
- 18,393
- 14,323
Indeed, its nowhere a requirement but currently there is a staff thread about it.
And as I said before, we don't have an absolute untouchablity, and once again, my whole main premise is not to debate with you or with the glass, but simply requesting further staff input for valid reasons.
This is derailment.
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,455
This isn't derailment. Asking for proof of type 5, and determining whether or not said proof qualifies, is literally the entire purpose of this thread.
Anyways, you would do well to read the actual type 5 standards, which clearly spell out how Yogiri does not in fact have sufficient evidence.
- 18,393
- 14,323
Oh no, I am really very good at reading. Don't worry, I was the one who made the thread, discussed about it, and very much the intention behind the line is also known the fact that there were anti-feats for the nature and therefore everything12 added it. The proof is there.
You did not counter my half of my arguments, therefore this is kinda derailment. There is a thread about it and acausality type 5 has been accepted it. Again for (4th time implying that you are not one who can't read), my point is not to debate, but to call more staff members.
You did not counter my half of my arguments, therefore this is kinda derailment. There is a thread about it and acausality type 5 has been accepted it. Again for (4th time implying that you are not one who can't read), my point is not to debate, but to call more staff members.
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,726
- 3,123
No, this is necessary and already exists, but we are trying to fix it as it is not listed on the Acausality page.
- 18,393
- 14,323
So her point stands, its a baseless requirement that came out of nowhere. So it was an absurd rejection.
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,726
- 3,123
In fact, this is one of the most important things that separates Type 4 and Type 5. Anyway, a revision has already been opened to discuss, let's not get derailed here.
- 18,393
- 14,323
Fact is, its unwarranted rejection that is based on a nonexistent standard. Fuji's point stands.
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,726
- 3,123
We'll see
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,455
Curious. So which characters would qualify for this, exactly?
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,726
- 3,123
Frankly, I don't know the contexts in the characters with Acausality Type 5 currently. I guess we'll see this later.
- 18,393
- 14,323
So you are now applying a change where in fact, you don't even know which characters may get rating resulting in nigh-impossible achievness?
Laughable. And not only that, my thread addressed this and Ultima already clarified that it is not required. Let's see
Laughable. And not only that, my thread addressed this and Ultima already clarified that it is not required. Let's see
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,455
Yeah alright
We ain't changing a power to make it so 0 characters qualify again.
We ain't changing a power to make it so 0 characters qualify again.
- 6,489
- 1,704
Where is this "new requirement" being discussed at? What crt?
- 43,104
- 37,244
BTW, there are multiple characters and verses who qualify lol
- 18,393
- 14,323
BTW, you can list them as well.
- 43,104
- 37,244
Let's see, Warhammer and Cradle Robber qualify for possibly
SCP noosphere shit qualifies for full on, and we havent even gone through the big verses like WoD or TES.
- 43,104
- 37,244
"TES Gods, Madoka Kaname, Time Lords (Doctor Who), Chaos Gods (Warhammer [possibly Type 5]), Cradle Robber (possibly Type 5),"
Scratch that OP did It for me
- Status
Similar threads
