- 21,783
- 4,826
First. On Powers & Abilities pages that are divided into types, they are almost always a method of how something has that power. Madness Manipulation users can drive their targets crazy through use of drugs (Type1), mind control (Type2), or just looking weird (Type3). Immortality users can be immortal because they lack the concept of death (Type 5), can transfer their consciousnesses to another body (Type 6), because they are beyond all laws of reality and death (type 10), or because they just don't age (Type 1). So now that I've explained how types of powers are effectively a method and explanation of why the character has that power...
Let's look at Acausality Type 3.
Our current definition for Type 3 Acausality is:
Type 3: Temporal Permanence: Characters with this type of Acausality are incredibly difficult to kill, as other versions of themselves - from other points in time and/or from other universes - can survive the destruction of the "original" and act in their place. This also grants them immunity to changes in the past.
Apart from the last sentence which seems rather tacked on**, this seems to have not much to do with our overarching explanation of Acausality, which is:
Acausality is the ability to act unrestrained by conventional cause and effect, on a scale that varies depending on the character. For some characters, this means not being affected by changes to the past; for others, this means defying all logic and acting with disregard for traditional causality.
An alternate self coming in when the original self dies doesn't seem like being unrestrained by conventional cause and effect. All our current explanation of Type 3 sounds like is a form of death activated Duplication or type 6 Immortality or Summoning. Even if you argue it's different enough from those to be separate, the power to bring in alternate selves when you die still certainly isn't inherently a character being unrestrained by conventional cause and effect, doesn't inherently mean they are immune to the past being changed, and certainly doesn't mean they defy all logic. In other words, Type 3 Acausality is not actually an explanation of how someone is Acausal.
Therefore, I propose a change to the definition of Type 3 to better fit with how a similar power would achieve and be an explanation of Acausality.
Type 3: Temporal Permanence: While characters with this type of Acausality can be conventionally affected by changes to the past, alternate versions of them from timelines that were not altered will replace them and continue to act in their place.
While this form of Acausality may be a little rarer, I believe that it is a clearer and more accurate method / explanation / Type of Acausality.
.**(and not even necessarily true - if a person automatically summoned alternate selves when they died - what if they were killed in the past before they gained this power? Why would the ability to bring in alternate selves still work if the person died before ever having the power? Why does the ability to bring in alternate selves inherently make you immune to changes to the past?)
Let's look at Acausality Type 3.
Our current definition for Type 3 Acausality is:
Type 3: Temporal Permanence: Characters with this type of Acausality are incredibly difficult to kill, as other versions of themselves - from other points in time and/or from other universes - can survive the destruction of the "original" and act in their place. This also grants them immunity to changes in the past.
Apart from the last sentence which seems rather tacked on**, this seems to have not much to do with our overarching explanation of Acausality, which is:
Acausality is the ability to act unrestrained by conventional cause and effect, on a scale that varies depending on the character. For some characters, this means not being affected by changes to the past; for others, this means defying all logic and acting with disregard for traditional causality.
An alternate self coming in when the original self dies doesn't seem like being unrestrained by conventional cause and effect. All our current explanation of Type 3 sounds like is a form of death activated Duplication or type 6 Immortality or Summoning. Even if you argue it's different enough from those to be separate, the power to bring in alternate selves when you die still certainly isn't inherently a character being unrestrained by conventional cause and effect, doesn't inherently mean they are immune to the past being changed, and certainly doesn't mean they defy all logic. In other words, Type 3 Acausality is not actually an explanation of how someone is Acausal.
Therefore, I propose a change to the definition of Type 3 to better fit with how a similar power would achieve and be an explanation of Acausality.
Type 3: Temporal Permanence: While characters with this type of Acausality can be conventionally affected by changes to the past, alternate versions of them from timelines that were not altered will replace them and continue to act in their place.
While this form of Acausality may be a little rarer, I believe that it is a clearer and more accurate method / explanation / Type of Acausality.
.**(and not even necessarily true - if a person automatically summoned alternate selves when they died - what if they were killed in the past before they gained this power? Why would the ability to bring in alternate selves still work if the person died before ever having the power? Why does the ability to bring in alternate selves inherently make you immune to changes to the past?)
