- 7,897
- 3,856
ftfyZoro21043 said:
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
abusive staff will close this thread as well
- Thread starter Ilovelovefairytail
- Start date
- Status
- 3,898
- 540
Your thread isn't closed yet lmao
- 14,285
- 11,300
Nobody is denying that, it's why he ain't in the match :^^^)Zoro21043 said:
- 14,163
- 2,525
Fortunately the op treated it like a versus thread to avoid appearing as a spite thread. Op also did the same to a previous "fun and games thread", asking for it to be closed once Natsu lost...Dienomite22 said:
- 182
- 18
That's has nothing to do with me I'm not the one who lock the thread so yeaIlovelovefairytail said:
- 14,163
- 2,525
@Dienomite as if it weren't obvious enoughIlovelovefairytail said:
- 2,942
- 1,060
Oh then Naruto Talk no Jutsu sweeps
- 7,897
- 3,856
That was response to ZoroSomebodyData said:
- 68
- 1
- Thread starter
- #91
that was a joke, what was even the point in quoting thatSomebodyData said:
this is fun and games, why are you so serious?
- 14,163
- 2,525
Yeah, I know. I'm using it as an example that OP is just trying to treat this as a vs thread.
- 7,897
- 3,856
You're using a joke as an example for seriousness?SomebodyData said:
- 68
- 1
- Thread starter
- #95
this is a battle, obviously
but its for fun and not meant to be taken seriously which is why its here and not versus threads, those are for serious threads
yet your taking it very seriously
but its for fun and not meant to be taken seriously which is why its here and not versus threads, those are for serious threads
yet your taking it very seriously
- 14,163
- 2,525
@Dienomite "Fortunately the op treated it like a versus thread to avoid appearing as a spite thread. Op also did the same to a previous "fun and games thread", asking for it to be closed once Natsu lost..."
Can we stop pretending here that op is making fun & games threads not to just bash one side? I'm not a fan of any verse here and its obvious. @Dienomite
Can we stop pretending here that op is making fun & games threads not to just bash one side? I'm not a fan of any verse here and its obvious. @Dienomite
- 68
- 1
- Thread starter
- #99
"technically allowed"
"it's still a stomp"
1. subjective
2. people have said the team wins meaning its not as clear cut of a stomp as you think, i dont think its a stomp
3. kaguya vs beerus etc exist, are those not stomps?
"it's still a stomp"
1. subjective
2. people have said the team wins meaning its not as clear cut of a stomp as you think, i dont think its a stomp
3. kaguya vs beerus etc exist, are those not stomps?
- 14,285
- 11,300
>your posting of this to Naruto discussion threads you're attempting to get a rise out of people.
Aren't you supposed to tag threads though?
Aren't you supposed to tag threads though?
- 182
- 18
Ilovelovefairytail said:
- 68
- 1
- Thread starter
- #102
people taking a thread in fun and games seriously is a personal issue, not something i caused
- 13,731
- 3,682
For fun and games? And it was done after someone said that SK stomps the verseChariot190 said:
- 14,163
- 2,525
@Chariot posting on discussion threads isn't the same as tagging topics.
- 68
- 1
- Thread starter
- #105
" For fun and games? And it was done after someone said that SK stomps the verse "
coincidental
i already said i posted it there because not many people were posting and the 10 hour bump rule is stupid, not because i wanted to antagonize naruto fans
trying to find reasons to "incriminate" me is just pathetic
coincidental
i already said i posted it there because not many people were posting and the 10 hour bump rule is stupid, not because i wanted to antagonize naruto fans
trying to find reasons to "incriminate" me is just pathetic
- 13,731
- 3,682
You literally took a fng thread seriously, anyone who looks at your contribs can say thisIlovelovefairytail said:
- 68
- 1
- Thread starter
- #107
im taking this thread seriously because im mad about injustice, im pretty sure i already told you that aswell
locking a thread for no reason makes me mad because of the principle not the thread itself
locking a thread for no reason makes me mad because of the principle not the thread itself
- 13,731
- 3,682
Im not talking about this threadIlovelovefairytail said:
- 68
- 1
- Thread starter
- #109
what thread? this thread is the same as the others just remade and kaguya/madara removed
- 13,731
- 3,682
SomebodyData said:
- 7,897
- 3,856
So you're accusing the guy of making threads with the purpose of bashing one side or causing a ruckas but simultaneously using him asking to close a FT vs Bleach thread before anything happened as proof of him taking threads seriously when he is a FT fan himself? Yea, that makes sense. Not to mention he already said this thread could be closed if the rules were broken and seems willing to get banned if proper reason is given.SomebodyData said:
- 1,404
- 538
Staff FRA
- 68
- 1
- Thread starter
- #114
you mean the natsu thread?
no. people told me it was a stomp because of soul crush and i was new to the site then. i didnt even read the rules until after that thread.
i said they should lock it because i didnt know any better
this is different and now i know threads like this arent against the rules
no. people told me it was a stomp because of soul crush and i was new to the site then. i didnt even read the rules until after that thread.
i said they should lock it because i didnt know any better
this is different and now i know threads like this arent against the rules
- 14,163
- 2,525
@Dienomite yes. The moment his character lost the 'fun and games thread' he asked for it to be closed.
- 1,404
- 538
Just lock this already...
- 68
- 1
- Thread starter
- #117
thats just stupid
i dont mean to insult you but that line of reasoning is just terrible and it seems like your grasping because you dont want to admit a staff member was at afault
i dont mean to insult you but that line of reasoning is just terrible and it seems like your grasping because you dont want to admit a staff member was at afault
- 182
- 18
Yea I can see this thread getting closed so idc anymore
Wokistan
Bioluminescent African American Working At The CIA
VS Battles
Administrator
Calculation Group
Human Resources
- 16,883
- 7,340
"1. subjective"
And because the staff are human beings, we use our best judgement and decide whether or not to close a thing. Sometimes this will lead to disagreement.
"2. people have said the team wins meaning its not as clear cut of a stomp as you think, i dont think its a stomp "
Nobody in the thread seems to have thought that, everyone else just said it was a stomp.
"3. kaguya vs beerus etc exist, are those not stomps?"
If it is, it can get closed too. What cannot happen is me instantly just knowing every single time a stomp thread pops up.
The matchup isn't fair, and trying to skirt by by having it be a F&G thread with serious discussion just runs into the exact same issues that got those matchups initially restricted and stomps normally shut. I do not think the threads should be reopened. Hell, this thread is getting rather hostile about a thing that's not even technically on topic.
And because the staff are human beings, we use our best judgement and decide whether or not to close a thing. Sometimes this will lead to disagreement.
"2. people have said the team wins meaning its not as clear cut of a stomp as you think, i dont think its a stomp "
Nobody in the thread seems to have thought that, everyone else just said it was a stomp.
"3. kaguya vs beerus etc exist, are those not stomps?"
If it is, it can get closed too. What cannot happen is me instantly just knowing every single time a stomp thread pops up.
The matchup isn't fair, and trying to skirt by by having it be a F&G thread with serious discussion just runs into the exact same issues that got those matchups initially restricted and stomps normally shut. I do not think the threads should be reopened. Hell, this thread is getting rather hostile about a thing that's not even technically on topic.
- 7,897
- 3,856
How is he trying to cause trouble if he accepted the outcome and asked for the thread to be closed? That's what I'm not understanding here. That goes against the idea of him intentionally spiting verses does it not?SomebodyData said:
- Status
Similar threads
