- 2,512
- 261
So this is about something that was debated before in this thread about giving Arceus Darkrai's abilities.
Basically one of the arguments that came up in that thread was that because Arceus has created the verse he should have the abilities of all its inhabitants, which is what the Note 4 on Arceus profile states.
The Everlasting, SomebodyData and I seem to have (as far as I am not misinterpreting their responses. I don't want to put words in their mouth) agreed in the thread that this reasoning doesn't hold (I will not copy over all arguments made in the thread. They are from post 20 onwards, which aren't that much text, especially if you skip the parts about immortality and danmaku).
Ultimately the suggestion of giving Arceus Darkrai's ablilities was rejected, but the Note of the profile which states that he should have them remains.
All in all I just want to suggest removing Note 4 based on the arguments already given in that thread.
Basically one of the arguments that came up in that thread was that because Arceus has created the verse he should have the abilities of all its inhabitants, which is what the Note 4 on Arceus profile states.
The Everlasting, SomebodyData and I seem to have (as far as I am not misinterpreting their responses. I don't want to put words in their mouth) agreed in the thread that this reasoning doesn't hold (I will not copy over all arguments made in the thread. They are from post 20 onwards, which aren't that much text, especially if you skip the parts about immortality and danmaku).
Ultimately the suggestion of giving Arceus Darkrai's ablilities was rejected, but the Note of the profile which states that he should have them remains.
All in all I just want to suggest removing Note 4 based on the arguments already given in that thread.