• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

4-A Zelda (again)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Im just telling you why Im against this.

@TheHadou no, the handbook is literally giving Majora a feat that is not implied or mentioned in the original game.
 
@Cal you know full well that the Digimon databook is at the level of a pokedex when it comes to canoncity, boi.
 
Being completely 100% honest, we're more likely to get 3-A Triforce or 4-A Wind Fish than we are to get 4-A Majora. At least they have stuff in-game that can be seen at that level.
 
Why would the giants be part of the SK's hurt mind, when they and Termina existed before that ever happened? That alone debunks the feat.
 
The triforce is the direct creation of Iier 2 deities. It only needs one feat or direct statement to jump anywhere.
 
It did cause the collapse of the Sacred Realm in ALBW, which is the same size as the Light World, which is Zelda's way of saying the universe ovo
 
Even if the feat is legit, wpuldn't that be 2-C (low)? I mean, 3-A is for destroying the physical matter. I honestly hate 3-A as a tier.
 
@Light. Even if the feat was legit (that's up for a debate that I'm not willing to have), it would be 3-A, as it's abundantly clear that time-space wasn't destroyed.
 
Do you think that this 4-A upgrade should be discussed more?
 
I read all of them. The only relevant is the direct statement implying that Majora created Termina. The rest is subjective, because Termina =/= Hyrule there is no reason for the triforce to be there, point 9 is still a subjective interpretation.
 
With the Triforce absent and the three golden goddesses not creating Termina, who do you belive created it? And most importantly, how was it not falling apart without the TF?
 
Burden of proof is on you.

And your proof is a semi-canon book.

You are just asking to a non-believer: If God didnt create the universe, who did it? And sorry for the christian reference.
 
Do you think that this 4-A upgrade should be discussed more?

Neutral on the situation. I'm just waiting for Azzy to give an end-all-be-all.
 
Every world in Zelda was created by some kind of deity, there's no reason to believe Termina is different. And you're skipping the second question.
 
Only Hyrule/Lorule are dependant on the triforce. the twilight realm doesnt have it and it exists.
 
TriforcePower1 said:
Every world in Zelda was created by some kind of deity, there's no reason to believe Termina is different. And you're skipping the second question.
That's an association fallacy. "All of X is Y so Z must be Y too" is not sound logic.
 
Ok:

Who created the Twilight realm? Why isnt it destroyed because they dont have a triforce?
 
Goddesses, and...oh. I see your point ovo.

If you're confused on what PaChi is trying to say, the Golden Goddesses (or the Light Spirits, idk) created the Twilight Realm, and it's a plot point that they have no Triforce.
 
If the universe was chaos before the GG, and they created the universe in this chaos, every world of the Zelda verse must have either been created by the GG during the creation of the universe, or created by some other deity (like the Wind Fish).
 
Majora never stated that he created Termina at all. That in of itself is an association fallacy since there's no legitimate proof that he made it.
 
Or someone unknown? I mean, we cant just upgrade a Verse because "Oh well, if it wasnt him, its him."
 
If Hyrule Encyclopedia flat out says that Majora created Termina, and any other candidate creating it is unreasonable when ignoring the Hyrule Encyclopedia, I think it's reasonable to say that he created Termina.
 
I've posted the scan of the pages above. There might be something else, so if someone knows japanese could he control them, please?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top