- 9,982
- 10,819
Smh, I am the one who made a crt over it 2 months ago, the problem has been solved, it's not needed anymore.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
2-B and "countless" revision
- Thread starter XXKINGXX69
- Start date
-
- Tags
- countless tiering system
- Status
- 32,835
- 38,104
You're not the first one and you won't be the last LMAO
The staff I know are higher dimensional beings that surpass your concepts of the word understanding. OwO
- 18,393
- 14,323
I mean, everything is arbitrary after low 2-C...
- 32,835
- 38,104
High 3-A you mean
Wokistan
Bioluminescent African American Working At The CIA
VS Battles
Administrator
Calculation Group
- 16,912
- 7,361
No, not really. On any front, actually.
- What separates my so called "cherry picking" of myraid from your usage of the less common use of countless? Why is just being like "definition 1" suddenly cherry picking when I do it? Are you prepared to address the fact that you're cherry picking countless far harder than I am myriad, under the terms you yourself set? Remember, I imposed none of this. Wanting to go to dictionaries is all you.
- In what way is "a great number" more supportive of your "countless usually means impossible to count to" than my "countless usually means a generic large number?"
- 9,982
- 10,819
As for infinite as for countless, context is who making the statement and expanded on the character or the statement itself. Just a statement as it is no one takes.
- 18,393
- 14,323
True. Also, Wokistan changed his name? I can't remember his old name lol.
- 18,393
- 14,323
How would you rate “I have destroyed countless space-time continuum”?
- 18,393
- 14,323
Wokistan
Bioluminescent African American Working At The CIA
VS Battles
Administrator
Calculation Group
- 16,912
- 7,361
Again, my position isn't incompatible with this. I'm fine with you being able to make an argument for the academic usage of the word countless, I just think you should have to make that argument because that's not usually what that word means. I want it to not be the default, not to just be unusable forever.
- 32,835
- 38,104
Doesn't mean much without context.
CONTEXT IS KEY FAM. CONTEXT.
Honestly tho none of this would've ever been a problem if people knew how to name tiers better LMFAO
- 9,982
- 10,819
Lol, true there are many, certainly tho, in my understanding they won't merge but will stay but if you say so then I guess I may have misjudged the things.
Smh I tried to merge them for my own personal intentions tho nvm
- 663
- 551
10-C
- 18,393
- 14,323
Ignore context, let's say he indeed destroyed countless space-time continuums, and it is proven that one “universe” is low 2-C.
REGARDLESS, all of it. How would you rate it? smh, ik the context matters bruh.
- 32,835
- 38,104
Depends on the context, multiversal structure and any other supporting evidence of travel between space-time continuums and if it gets heavy into the more scientific side of things.
- 18,393
- 14,323
...
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,176
- 4,024
80
- 9,982
- 10,819
If the character has atleast feats nearing or not too far below the statement in question which is w/o context has been stated then yes but like he hasn't even shown planet lvl feat and just statement like that exist then may not
- 24,974
- 26,821
This is better and more tidy. 2-C has always been kind redundant
- 18,393
- 14,323
Do you guys think I ignore context? I am saying “regardless of context”. Hypothetically.
- 9,982
- 10,819
Let me quote the premises to be clear.
You :- even if the statement over countless is coming from reliable character or sources it shouldn't be default to 2B.
Me :- if the statement is coming from reliable character and sources then no reason to vandalise it.
Is this what are the premises is?
Wokistan
Bioluminescent African American Working At The CIA
VS Battles
Administrator
Calculation Group
- 16,912
- 7,361
That's what the entire contention of this thread is about. What to do without context. If you had literally zero you just wouldn't do anything with the statement, but that applies to basically everything on the website.
- 9,982
- 10,819
Would be hard to say. If no context is present. But "possibly" can be assigned in this case.
- 18,393
- 14,323
Basically, I will take “Rimuru 2-B” as a reference, it contains there countless universes. How would rate it now?
Wokistan
Bioluminescent African American Working At The CIA
VS Battles
Administrator
Calculation Group
- 16,912
- 7,361
Reliability in this case would be something you'd have to prove in the first place. You'd need to make an argument as to why the statement giver would be using academia countless, and if that argument works out then congrats more biggatons for everyone. I would make the reliability or credibility of the statement's source a positive claim.
By doing this you add a whole lot of context to analyze, though. Whether Rimuru specifically or not would work isn't really under the scope of this thread unless you've got some specific issue with proposed standards you'd like to use him as a case to exemplify.
Anyways I don't care about anime and I don't have the time to go scrutinize his in particular so I have no opinion on how to rate him
- 32,835
- 38,104
OP is just assuming we slap on countless without all that context.
Sniper670
He/Him- 6,409
- 1,365
- 9,982
- 10,819
Then I am standing with my premise for the reasons I've stated above. Will not derail any further as I've all said with me
Wokistan
Bioluminescent African American Working At The CIA
VS Battles
Administrator
Calculation Group
- 16,912
- 7,361
OP isn't very coherent but it does open up with "I don't think it should default to this." I'm pretty sure on Xenforo there's a way for mods to edit post positions and put in a new OP but I'm not gonna fiddle around with that right before sleeping that seems like a bad idea
- 18,393
- 14,323
That was not anime, that was a web novel, plus the only reason he got 2-B, was indeed a “countless worlds” statement.
There were no others than this. But also, nothing here suggests there is any contradiction or hyperbole meaning, the ability was indeed powerful.
- 9,982
- 10,819
10000s world's statement is there, isn't it? Iirc.
- 18,393
- 14,323
Wait, true, my bad. LOL. Actually, never mind, since “countless” and 10,000 worlds are evidences for 2-B
Wokistan
Bioluminescent African American Working At The CIA
VS Battles
Administrator
Calculation Group
- 16,912
- 7,361
I mean the point is that by bringing up Rimuru you're introducing a lot of context and getting away from "what do we do in the absence of said context." To evaluate Rimuru I'd have to go read his stuff myself, I don't really want to do that, so I'm just not opining on him in particular. His specific tier is not really what this thread is about.
- 18,393
- 14,323
I used the wrong example, since there is proof of 2-B rather than “countless Worlds”
- 18,393
- 14,323
- 10,920
- 19,016
Certified XXKINGXX69 Moment (again......)
- 9,982
- 10,819
I'll lean to 2B there isn't any type of multiverse from type 1 to type 4 that limits the universes to this extent but simply go over countless or infinite, 5 or 100 universes within multiverse (theoritically) is already rare to say the least and when given the direct statement of countless I won't pressume it to be limited for no reason but maybe.
- Status
Similar threads
