• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Search results for query: *

  1. Danny1112

    Dc General Cosmic Revision ( How far into 1A are the characters and cosmology )

    Calling my point gibberish is not a debunk. Tell me, how does creating or destroying an infinite amount of 1A structure still leaves a character at baseline 1A? At the same scenario of a character who just transcends an Infinite dimensional space or high hyperversal structures?
  2. Danny1112

    Dc General Cosmic Revision ( How far into 1A are the characters and cosmology )

    Destroying or creating two outerversal structures creates the stacking, that's what it means to stack. Transcending or being at the point where a 1A is just fictional puts you above all those levels of 1A, it's not that different from a 5D being completely above all levels or sizes of 4D space.
  3. Danny1112

    Dc General Cosmic Revision ( How far into 1A are the characters and cosmology )

    That has nothing to do with what am arguing. Am debating against the idea that for you to be a step above baseline outerversal, you have to transcend "Baseline outerversal". The whole logic goes against the meaning of transcending.
  4. Danny1112

    Dc General Cosmic Revision ( How far into 1A are the characters and cosmology )

    How is it still baseline? Your logic is like saying a character destroying two mountains is still the same as destroying one, which is dumb.
  5. Danny1112

    Dc General Cosmic Revision ( How far into 1A are the characters and cosmology )

    A character viewing a 1A baseline character as fictional is enough to put the character at High 1A since it just literally means the character is far and apart from all levels of 1A. Defeating a baseline 1A character makes the character 1 step above baseline 1A, a character stated to be superior...
  6. Danny1112

    Dc General Cosmic Revision ( How far into 1A are the characters and cosmology )

    How any of them is 1A is beyond me, however seeing an Infinite dimensional space as fictional is enough to put the said character in 1A, likewise with 1A and High 1A. The baseline hierarchy is not a matter of transcendence but being superior, basically if a character defeated a baseline 1A...
  7. Danny1112

    About Eternity

    What browser do you use? Maybe it's selective.
  8. Danny1112

    About Eternity

    Thanks man
  9. Danny1112

    About Eternity

    Does anyone have the scan that cites Doctor Strange feeling more dimensions than the usual four after entering Eternity? The link provided in the Eternity page that indicates this, is not working.
  10. Danny1112

    Invincible Downgrade

    And mind you, Thadeus wasn't confident in his speech since he added "Could" meaning it was just a guess and aligns with fact it was a moment thinking, it wasn't their plan to destroy the planet. What they needed Space Ranger for, was to bring those monsters and his gun since they can harm...
  11. Danny1112

    Invincible Downgrade

    And this doesn't matter when the whole plot dosen't make sense. We literally saw the whole planet go boom after their impact. There's no need for other feats to prove that. There's no proof that the beam destabilizes stuffs and what type of instability it causes for that matter, the only...
  12. Danny1112

    Invincible Downgrade

    That doesn't refute anything. You would have an argument if it was established in the verse that drilling a hole in the core of planets can cause the planets to loose their gravitational binding energy and become a match for fireworks but there was no info whatsoever presented before and after...
  13. Danny1112

    Invincible Downgrade

    Ok, so I just got time to read this and I don't get what the op presented that everyone is like "I agree". How does an unstable core help them in that situation? Not only that, but the lack of information of the type instability that occurred. Going by the feats of the beam, the core would just...
  14. Danny1112

    Invincible Downgrade

    Actually, surface gravity is directly proportional to mass and inversely proportional to radius.
  15. Danny1112

    Featherine tier level

    How high in High Outerversal is Featherine?
  16. Danny1112

    Invincible Planet feat discussion

    Breaking apart and cracking are literally the same thing, whether it's cracking to pieces or breaking to pieces. It all simply means when something becomes unbounded, unattached to the whole or something. The comparison of meteor to a planet is simply asinine since a cracked meteor would just...
  17. Danny1112

    Invincible Planet feat discussion

    Breaking apart and cracking can literally be described as the same thing. It wasn't shown that the asteroid broke to that extent, instead we see Omni Man and his pal charge out from the asteroid like they broke it apart fully. All the beam did was create a tiny crater not even the size of small...
  18. Danny1112

    Invincible Planet feat discussion

    "It's breaking apart" and "causing a chain reaction" are two different things fam. We only see the asteroid crack and afterwards Omni man and his pal break it apart fully. It didn't explode due to the unstable core, the planet was literally fine until Mark and co hit the planet. The fact...
  19. Danny1112

    Invincible Planet feat discussion

    There have been nothing posted that supports it being able to cause chain reactions. The only thing posted suggest it cracks any planetary bodies it comes in contact with. So basically, it cracked the core of the planet which is the reason for its destabilization. So it could be it just cracked...
  20. Danny1112

    Invincible Planet feat discussion

    It dosen't add much, it lifts the mass of Earth from 5.972e24 to 7.465e24 kg
  21. Danny1112

    Invincible Planet feat discussion

    The "Planet's core" actually, which was even stated. However, what's being argued is if the planet's core holds the whole mass of the planet together which is wrong scientifically and would be an assumption due to no citation or evidence to back it up. Even if the GBE of the planet was...
  22. Danny1112

    Invincible Planet feat discussion

    That's not what's being debated. And that limit was based on an "Assumption".
  23. Danny1112

    Invincible season 1 amazon tv show discussion

    He did say it was casual.
  24. Danny1112

    Invincible Planet feat discussion

    The claims for Thaddeus are based on assumptions and shouldn't be taken seriously due to nothing backing them up.
  25. Danny1112

    Invincible season 1 amazon tv show discussion

    I did the calc, it's actually 241 exatons of tnt (moon level). And that's using the low end of meteors from space which is unusual for most meteors.
  26. Danny1112

    Invincible Planet feat discussion

    I thought the next calc was to be about the K.E of the explosion. I made a calc about that, how does it look?
  27. Danny1112

    Invincible Planet feat discussion

    This https://vsbattles.com/threads/invincible-amazon-tv-show-discussion.114585/post-3783736
  28. Danny1112

    Invincible season 1 amazon tv show discussion

    That's just you putting things together to make sense out of it as there's no proof that the planet's core being destabilized was the reason the planet exploded. The citation that was shown only said that they had to hurry before the core becomes stable as they "Could" die from the impact and...
  29. Danny1112

    Invincible season 1 amazon tv show discussion

    And there's no citation or evidence of it being a domino effect. The beam only showed feats of destroying anything along its line of area and dosen't affect anything that's around it or outside its line of area. It just could have put a hole in the core of the planet, however that doesn't mean...
  30. Danny1112

    Invincible season 1 amazon tv show discussion

    Anyways, I recalced the feat using K.E and with a minor adjustment
  31. Danny1112

    Invincible season 1 amazon tv show discussion

    If the beam was the one that destroyed the planet, then there won't have been any reason for them to do what they did.
  32. Danny1112

    Invincible season 1 amazon tv show discussion

    So I've checked the feat thoroughly and my opinion still remains the same. There was no citation that the beam shot was the reason they could destroy the planet. The only thing that was mentioned, is that...they had to reach the surface of the planet before the core stabilizes as they COULD die...
  33. Danny1112

    Invincible season 1 amazon tv show discussion

    As long as the planet remained intact, the GBE of the planet remains intact but I just need to read the whole thing to properly understand where I stand.
  34. Danny1112

    Invincible season 1 amazon tv show discussion

    Can someone tell which issue this all happened? I want to confirm my outlook on this whole thing.
  35. Danny1112

    Invincible season 1 amazon tv show discussion

    He dose He doesn't just leave the solar system, he goes to another solar system. The nearest solar system to ours is 4.5 light years away.
  36. Danny1112

    Invincible season 1 amazon tv show discussion

    An unstable core doesn't mean a weakened GBE of the planet, google it up.
  37. Danny1112

    Invincible season 1 amazon tv show discussion

    And I explained why it's wrong
  38. Danny1112

    Invincible season 1 amazon tv show discussion

    The calc is wrong considering they overcame the Gravitational Binding Energy of the planet, they didn't pulverize it or fragmentize it. Overcoming the GBE of planet the size of Earth is what got the baseline point for Planet level, Viltrum planet has a higher gravitational pull than earth...
  39. Danny1112

    Invincible season 1 amazon tv show discussion

    What recalc?
  40. Danny1112

    Invincible season 1 amazon tv show discussion

    The core was destabilized, not the planet. An unstable core has an overtime effect on a planet and does not mean that the planet gets easy to bust.
Back
Top