• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
TheRustyOne
Reaction score
11,222

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • Don't DM me for calc evaluations, you can just leave a message here if the Evaluation Thread isn't working for you.
    Hi Rusty, Could you please review this thread?
    TheRustyOne
    TheRustyOne
    You didn't need to make a thread about this, you've just brought this up to my attention.

    Considering the manga shows it in the same manner, there shouldn't be any problem with calculation.
    Fallen_Angelicx
    Fallen_Angelicx
    I see. I made a thread since i already made most of the verse Superhuman in speed and since it's been months, thought it would be too late to respond. I'll keep this in mind next time, thanks btw 🙏🏽
    Hello Rusty, I tried my first speed calc and I think I made alot of errors. Could you please leave some suggestions so I can fix it
    GunshyFever
    GunshyFever
    Hello again, I tried my hands at a speed feat more simple, although it might be wrong. Could you please check it?

    Edit: If a link is not working, just remove the /%7C/ at the end of the link
    TheRustyOne
    TheRustyOne
    No way am I dealing with that.

    Manga panels and bullet stuff is way too messy and gets heated in conflict.

    Let me tell you right now, there's nothing in that panel that shows him dodging the bullet like you're claiming. The manga would need to show the bullet in mid air and show Denji is still in the path of the bullet. If that's not shown you don't have a feat no matter what you claim. Since he could've dodged before it was fired.

    This is all I'll say on the matter, your free to ask another calc group member but I don't want the headache.
    GunshyFever
    GunshyFever
    Hello again, I found a new feat I want to attempt (specifically to replace the current Mach 6 feat that most Mid - High tiers scale to in CSM regarding that it got rejected). I found this feat and it looks like it would yield good results regarding that those are supersonic arrows and Santa was able to catch them without effort. However although it would serve as a good replacement, I have no idea is its actually calcable because seemingly there is no distance
    TheRustyOne
    TheRustyOne
    I'm not fully confident in these types of calcs, especially this many.

    There's an issue with them I, personally, need to resolve before I can conclusively say anything.
    Viott
    Viott
    If there is a problem with my calculation, can you tell me when you have time?
    Could use feedback
    TheRustyOne
    TheRustyOne
    My opinion is irrelevant as I'm just a calc group member.

    I don't see anything wrong with CRT myself though, if you want to know.
    TheAngryOrange
    I don't mean in a 'please sign off on this' sort of way. Just a 'i know about nier' sort of way. Especially with the last bit since the change proposed is rather drastic and if I recall correctly you used to be an admin or something so you can comment if a change like that actually benefits the pages.
    TheRustyOne
    TheRustyOne
    Your still measuring the building wrongly.

    You can't px something like that, the way to find the height in that picture only would be through the use of angular size.

    Your window scale becomes inaccurate when something gets closer or further away from the "screen". That's why angular size exist.
    Viott
    Viott
    TheRustyOne
    TheRustyOne
    For the first one I think you should get someone else is opinion at this point, due to how much has changed.

    And I don't deal with those kind of feats in the second calc anymore, way too much trouble. I personally don't see them as feats anymore.
    Hello Rusty, I hope you're having a good day today. Now this has been evaluated by one of the members of the evaluation group, but I would like to hear your opinion on this.

    I know your policy about Calc Evaluations, but I come here because this calculation purportedly implements ISL, and reading through it... I would like someone who has familiarized themselves with this formula and gotten it approved.
    DastardlyDangerousDracoga
    DastardlyDangerousDracoga
    Oh... yeah I didn't know that was there. I'm assuming due to the brief response, you agree with what Agnaa said, yes?
    TheRustyOne
    TheRustyOne
    It's not just an agreement, he is correct. From what I remember, I brought up that blog myself when discussing how the inverse square law worked.

    I didn't understand ISL back then and was researching it. I saw that blog was accepted and was confused by why it was different compared to what I was researching and trying out for myself. The method was different and the results were massively inflated beyond belief.

    The calculation is flawed, they aren't using the formula properly and are ignoring the object's surface area.
    DastardlyDangerousDracoga
    DastardlyDangerousDracoga
    I didn't know you came across this prior to me asking. To be completely honest, I also held some suspicions when I had came across that blog.

    But nonetheless resolved, and I commend your efforts of gaining knowledge and experience working with ISL. Hope you a good rest of your day.
    Hi, sorry for bother you but if you have time, can you check my calcs?

    Except for one, they are all simple speed calculations
    TheRustyOne
    TheRustyOne
    There's usually a limit to how many calculations I can evaluate at once.

    Not only that but this is Marvel as well, sorry but I'm not touching that, best to ask someone else.
    Oliver_de_jesus
    Oliver_de_jesus
    Okey, not problema
    Hello, was wondering if you can evaluate this calc, when you are available. Thanks in advance!!
    • Like
    Reactions: TheRustyOne
    Divini
    Divini
    Hello, sorry for disturbing, i wanted to inform that i have corrected the calc based on your comment so maybe you can take another look now? thanks in advance
    TheRustyOne
    TheRustyOne
    I meant you should trace the top thing to get its surface area, so that way you wouldn't have to deal with trying to fit it into a standard shape, because it's not.

    Also, you cannot find thickness on a forward facing shot, that's impossible. You need another scan to get the thickness there.
    • Like
    Reactions: Divini
    Hey I've been trying to ask people around a lot for an evaluation and my calc's been around the eval thread for a while now to the point I could potentially bump it again soon.
    Could you help me out with this please?
    Could you please comment on this thread?
    Hello. Can you please tell me what you think about it? Tearing jaw is Class 10 LS

    Super Variant Walker from The Walking Dead Verse tear jaw of another super variant walker

    But because the bones of walkers are more rotten than those of humans, I think is class 5 LS?

    And Daryl from The Walking Dead Verse could resist and struggle with this type of walker


    Could this be saying that Daryl have class 1 or at least class 1 Lifting Strenght?

    Interested?
    TheRustyOne
    TheRustyOne
    Going to be real honest, my interest in RWBY at all on this wiki is very small.

    So no, I'm not interested in this.
    TheRustyOne
    TheRustyOne
    No thanks, something is telling me that will lead to headaches for me.

    I rather not get involved. Hopefully it's just a bad feeling and everything goes alright with you in reality, but I'm not taking any chances.
    Viott
    Viott
    I understand
    Hello, can you tell me your opinion about kinetic energy?
    We need one more calc group's opinion to close this thread. Can you help me?
    Hey Rusty, I'd one question regarding ground explosion calcs, are we supposed to calculate volume of non-spherical explosions (such as parallel or kind of conical) then evaluate it with spherical volume to get its radius then apply explosion formula? Or we just take radius as whatever it extends to on ground disregarding it's shape/volume?
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top