Mbpoops
He/Him- 8,608
- 7,893
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Dragon Ball Heroes: A CRT that doesn't even exist
- Thread starter Vietthai96
- Start date
- 494
- 862
That’s the case for most verses though.
DBH has the opposite issue of DBS where no one cares enough to scrutinise it nearly as much and we end up with stuff like time = everything and CM1 that wouldn’t fly otherwise. I wouldn’t be surprised if a handful of the more abstract abilities it has turn out to be bunk too. This is an issue a lot of verses outside of Shounen and comic stuff have where staff members aren’t interested or knowledgeable enough to fully engage and become increasingly lenient.
Tangent aside this NEP stuff looks shaky as hell though.
Last edited:
- 494
- 862
- 7,328
- 5,511
I have to disagree with this
There is almost no elaboration, nor explanation, nor any properly established mechanism other than
"This place doesn't exist in history." and leave it at that.
And can we reasonably assume that when Frieza dropped that statement, he was aware of things or places mentioned in the manga?
There is almost no elaboration, nor explanation, nor any properly established mechanism other than
"This place doesn't exist in history." and leave it at that.
And can we reasonably assume that when Frieza dropped that statement, he was aware of things or places mentioned in the manga?
- 5,078
- 4,108
Yeah, I will have to disagree with this, the opposition has mentioned more than enough counterpoints.
- 183
- 525
… I thought this is a fun and game thread so I ignored this.
Anyway Hecky and Nova already explained, as well as others, I have to disagree the same, the fact that said "history does not exist" REALLY does not going to grant you NEP out of blow, whether you argue flowery or not.Worse that time manipulation still works anyway so eh.
Anyway, this thread is Honkai (flowery language) diffed pretty much.
Anyway Hecky and Nova already explained, as well as others, I have to disagree the same, the fact that said "history does not exist" REALLY does not going to grant you NEP out of blow, whether you argue flowery or not.
Anyway, this thread is Honkai (flowery language) diffed pretty much.
- 494
- 862
- 24
- 43
From what I've read, it seems good.
- 7,399
- 7,837
Yeah, based on what Hecky and other users said, I disagree.
- 11,511
- 5,338
disagree.
- 1,241
- 582
I agree. It seems the thread is solid and has presented good evidence supporting the original poster’s claims.
- 14,998
- 10,397
- 494
- 862
Killerdrone123
He/Him- 2,767
- 2,844
What do you think about subspace itself qualifying for nep 2 since it's preety much said to lack the very concept of space and time and said to transcend time and in as explained in terminology page time is history which is both existence and non existence and said to transcend them
- 14,998
- 10,397
but killer sama
how can subspace be nep2 if the hyperbolic time chamber exists inside of it
- 5,592
- 6,893
Icl reading through some other stuff here, everything seems horribly wanked.
Yea, I dunno about this chief. It doesn’t appear like “transcending time” here is being qualified this way. To me it seems that it simply a place wherein time doesn’t pass in the conventional sense, which then allows for instantaneous travel. Like a timestop of sorts.
Killerdrone123
He/Him- 2,767
- 2,844
Killerdrone123
He/Him- 2,767
- 2,844
There is a direct statement of subspace lacking concept of space and time i beleive vieth didn't include it the i.t statement further supports this notion
- 5,592
- 6,893
Yea but this isn’t mutually exclusive to my interpretation. You can have both statements refer to the same thing, really.
In fact, a nice reductio of this would that in the sense that if “lack” is used in conjunction or relation with “transcend”—here, particularly in regards to the “concept of space and time”—then you could just start aiming for a Low 1-A rating all things considered. But as far as I’m aware, that doesn’t seem to be anyones goal. Strange.
Could be that it’s maybe not meant to be taken so so literally.
- 1,321
- 370
Bro it's not good anymore
Killerdrone123
He/Him- 2,767
- 2,844
Again everyone can have different interpretations there is a direct statement of it lacking time and i.t stuff directly proofs there being absence of time on its own,you to prove why this statement doesn't hold in literal sense cause now your entire argument is "i don't feel like it"
Last edited:
ExcelsisBerny
She/Her- 1,674
- 3,012
- 14,998
- 10,397
but its weird because if what you're saying is true, then subspace would literally be Low 1-A or 1-A right now and we know thats just wrong...
its similar to how if infinite uni db gets accepted, then the verse would have infinite speed which we know isn't right
- 575
- 494
Could you not make comments like this? This is the second time I’ve seen this comment from you. Do I believe other verses are wanked? Sure, but if one or a group of people want to attempt an upgrade and believe it’s reasonable what we aren’t going to do forbid it. Let people do what they want, you aren’t physically stopping anybody but it comes across as demotivating and even assuming it’s wrong that’s what users and staff are here for. They’ll kindly correct them on their wrong views and the thread will function from there. Stop derailing.Don't give them ideas pls
Already expressed my disagreement with this offsite but as for NEP2 subspace and given the statements along with it I think I’m neutral leading towards agreeing. I think myself and others require more input before I have a solidified stance
Killerdrone123
He/Him- 2,767
- 2,844
This is not the thread for that seriously as I have said let it be for future threads to tackle
- 2,936
- 3,581
^ This type counter got irony diffed so don't joke lad and get what Nova is saying
If you still didn't understand his pretty simple words
Context matters here not random buzzwords dropping and converting them altogether to powerscaling brainrot
And since i am not lazy to read your scans rn
Yes now I can see what Nova meant here, idk what here even tells nonexistent space but sure.
Place outside world with different concept of time = nonexistent place, ok.
Killerdrone123
He/Him- 2,767
- 2,844
We are completely ignoring the second scan i see,also the concept of time thing is refering to htc which literally works in my favour cause if they simply want to say "oh no look subspace have just different concept of time " they would have said so just like they did with HTC while on the other hand they straight up go on saying that it lacks concept of space and time
^ This type counter got irony diffed so don't joke lad and get what Nova is saying
If you still didn't understand his pretty simple words
Context matters here not random buzzwords dropping and converting them altogether to powerscaling brainrot
And since i am not lazy to read your scans rn
Yes now I can see what Nova meant here, idk what here even tells nonexistent space but sure.
Place outside world with different concept of time = nonexistent place, ok.
The first part of imgur was there to prove that htc and sugoroku space are part of subspace
Last edited:
ExcelsisBerny
She/Her- 1,674
- 3,012
Why are you crying so loud over nothing.
- 5,078
- 4,108
I will be real, I am more concerned how some
So wait, we are not only nuking whats being proposed, but also what is already accepted?
^ This type counter got irony diffed so don't joke lad and get what Nova is saying
If you still didn't understand his pretty simple words
Context matters here not random buzzwords dropping and converting them altogether to powerscaling brainrot
And since i am not lazy to read your scans rn
Yes now I can see what Nova meant here, idk what here even tells nonexistent space but sure.
Place outside world with different concept of time = nonexistent place, ok.
- 15,513
- 4,497
Stop derailing.
- 1,037
- 1,913
- 1,241
- 582
I ask everyone to stay on topic, and please refrain from discussing matters that were already accepted previously here. If you have an issue with something that has already been accepted, you can open a separate thread for that.
- 435
- 922
Ultimuru makes sense to me.
- 2,936
- 3,581
So? How does even correlate to what I said here
I wouldn't really wonder if both scans taken from two different databooks to create coherency issues, so i would ask source of both databooks to check(Otherwise lmao CM level coherency issues)
It doesn't work for your favour, because it can be interpreted as "They lack concept of space-time of normal universe yet have different space-time laws" something fiction does for obvious reasons. It is pretty common thing. But we give NEP to absence of everything. Which I don't see here.
Two scans claim
1. It has different concept of time
2. It it outside of universe so lacks concept of time
Which already contradiction unless you want to merge it doesn't play in your favour rather can be interpreted "Subspace has different nomological law" so lacking normal concept of time is logical here.
I am js checking on what they are arguing(scans or whatever), idc if they keep Subspace as NEP
This and this not good scans to prove NEP 2 either, they are super vague to argue something(especially databook one so I will leave it to @ExcelsisBerny if she has own interpretation after reading it)
Killerdrone123
He/Him- 2,767
- 2,844
Both are from Chozenshu 4 so no they are not from different guidebooks
The line of it having different concept of time is refering to hyperbolic time chamber not subspace the subspace doesn't have any statement of having different concept of time it's misinterpretation on your part
"It is a different dimensional world that does not belong to any part of the world, and includes the "Room of Spirit and Time" in the Temple of God and the interdimensional "Sugoroku Space." The concept of time is different in the "Room of Spirit and Time," and a year here corresponds to one day in the outside world. There are no living creatures that inhabit this room"
It is talking about rosat not subspace the description it says about subspace is that it is a different dimensional world that does not belong to any part of world and it has no statement of having different laws of space time
Last edited:
- 7,810
- 11,678
Friends, this is a reminder to remain both on-topic and respectful.
@ExcelsisBerny Telling people they're crying over nothing is quite rude for no reason. Please find a more polite way to phrase whatever you're trying to say.
@ExcelsisBerny Telling people they're crying over nothing is quite rude for no reason. Please find a more polite way to phrase whatever you're trying to say.
- 3,402
- 2,468
I'm sorry, but how do we know that this specific mention of time of a Guidebook from 2003 uses the terminology of time from Dragon Ball Xenoverse/Heroes, when it came 12 years before the first Xenoverse game and 7 years before the first DBH content? How do we know the author meant by time the all encompassing history yada yada that Chronoa and all Time Patrols use of time if, at that time, none of these concepts were created and most likely not even conceived?
Hell, how do we even treat these spaces as part of a timeline (per OP, the IT realm is part of the subspace, which is contained in one timeline), i.e., of history if they lack the aspect of history?
Oh, and now that we brought that page up, can we, please, delete the "Logic" section that was rejected to actually qualify per the new standards in a previous CRT made by OP?
ExcelsisBerny
She/Her- 1,674
- 3,012
They are surrendering themselves to tears over a grievance so insubstantial that it scarcely deserves the dignity of being named
- 7,810
- 11,678
Well, that is at least funny. I think the crying part is what's important, though.
If you had just said they're spending too much thought on something that you don't think is important, that would've been fine.
Similar threads
- Locked
