Comprehensive Summary of the Topic:
First, regarding the NEP 3 justification, it is already incorrect
because when Guenael Lee hides his form and becomes invisible, an illusory image remains in the opponent’s perception of him, and therefore when the opponent attempts to strike him, they do not actually hit him.
"IN VERSION 1, MY FORM DISAPPEARS."
"IN VERSION 2, MY EXISTENCE DISAPPEARS."
"IN VERSION 2 THAT I JUST USED, WHEN MY FORM IS BEGINNING TO DISAPPEAR..."
"...MY EXISTENCE IS NO LONGER THERE."
"ONLY THE ILLUSION THAT YOU STRUCK THE AFTERIMAGE OF MY FORM... CAPTURED IN YOUR SIGHTS REMAINS."
Because of this misunderstanding, NEP 3 was added.
Now regarding NEP 1, the matter is very simple.
In Version 1, he hides his form and becomes invisible, and this can also be observed in the anime. After that, in Version 2, he hides his existence. This statement does not mean that he literally ceases to exist; rather, he hides his existence from his opponent, meaning he conceals himself so that they do not know his location. He changes his position and hides himself after concealing his form, and thus the opponent cannot strike him or determine where he is. This can be observed even in the anime, while the manga explains it more clearly, stating that he was simply no longer there. When he hid himself, an afterimage of his form remained in the opponent’s vision, and when the opponent attacked it, they hit nothing.
Therefore, he said that his existence there had disappeared because he changed location. This is clearer in the manga and can also be seen in the anime. When he said he hides his existence, this is what he meant, not that he literally ceased to exist. That interpretation is unsupported by evidence. What both the manga and anime support is that he merely hides himself from his opponent in other locations after concealing his form, and this is what the manga justifies.
"IN VERSION 1, MY FORM DISAPPEARS."
"IN VERSION 2, MY EXISTENCE DISAPPEARS."
"IN VERSION 2 THAT I JUST USED, WHEN MY FORM IS BEGINNING TO DISAPPEAR..."
"...MY EXISTENCE IS NO LONGER THERE."
"ONLY THE ILLUSION THAT YOU STRUCK THE AFTERIMAGE OF MY FORM... CAPTURED IN YOUR SIGHTS REMAINS."
Contradictions:
First, I will leave the full scene here for viewing.
- Guenael Lee was struck normally by the opponent’s sword, began coughing blood, received attacks from the opponent, became incapacitated, and would have died normally from an ordinary sword at that moment. Then Gremmy appeared and killed him in a normal manner as well, not through anything special such as erasure or anything similar—he simply exploded him, his blood scattered, and he died normally. He would have died anyway at the hands of a small girl wielding only a sword. This contradicts NEP 3 first and foremost because he can still be struck, and as we explained earlier, what remains is merely an afterimage in the opponent’s vision, so when they attack it, they do not hit him.
- Dying normally through bodily explosion also contradicts possessing NEP 1, and he would have died from an ordinary sword as well. His death was not some special erasure; he was not erased at all. His body was exploded, his blood scattered, and he would have been killed by the lieutenant’s sword regardless.
- It is true that he said he hides his existence, but this phrase does not mean that he literally no longer exists. Rather, he hides himself from the opponent after concealing his form and changes his position so the opponent cannot determine where he is, as is clearly shown in both the anime and manga. In the manga specifically, it is directly clarified that he changes location, and this is also visible in the anime.
"...MY EXISTENCE IS NO LONGER THERE."
Relying on a single phrase and interpreting it however you want, despite it being an ordinary expression with multiple possible meanings, is not logical. Furthermore, the intended meaning is clarified in both the anime and the manga, and there are many contradictions with NEP in the first place.
The opponents’ arguments:
In short, the opponents are attempting to selectively cut small portions of the video in order to mislead the audience here and then interpret matters based on a heavily fragmented version of the footage.
After that, they attack the manga and claim it is not official, despite the NEP justifications themselves being based on the manga, and even the anime itself does not support their claims once the original complete video is examined.
They attempt to take the phrase “hides his existence” as if it means he literally became nonexistent, despite numerous contradictions and despite the meaning already being clarified in both the manga and anime, where he hides, changes position, suddenly appears, and delivers attacks. This is what is meant by “hiding his existence,” and you can observe this in the video.
That is everything, and here is the video:
This is the complete summary, so we can now stop making the discussion longer and simply wait for the staff’s opinion.