- 3,142
- 3,172
MHA found dead in a ditchCloud feats should be nuked tbh. Moving a Nimbus cloud should not make you Cuba-busting without other stuff in my personal view.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
MHA found dead in a ditchCloud feats should be nuked tbh. Moving a Nimbus cloud should not make you Cuba-busting without other stuff in my personal view.
No offense, but the thread is for the canon debate.Hey somebodydata think I can post this there? Or think I should change something? It's fine If you don't think the comment supports much the discussion.
Nah Re Zero has way more cloud feats and are entirely carried by clouds.MHA found dead in a ditch
Funny how cloud feats almost always are divorced from the rest of the feats the characters have in most verses, in terms of scale/potency.
Cloud feats should be nuked tbh. Moving a Nimbus cloud should not make you Cuba-busting without other stuff in my personal view.
Funny how cloud feats almost always are divorced from the rest of the feats the characters have in most verses, in terms of scale/potency.
If I could like these multiple times I would. There's a huge difference between making a storm and moving some clouds Like normally the ******' clouds are worth more for AP than the actual destruction of the feat itself.Cloud feats should be nuked tbh. Moving a Nimbus cloud should not make you Cuba-busting without other stuff in my personal view.
Surprised it's only the second time if what you're saying is true ngl; usually controversial or popular verses have quite a fewWow, the calc guy put the CRT in Staff once again. It seems like he prefers avoiding dealing with the supporters’ arguments, and limiting everyone to a single comment...
Honestly, this whole Staff situation has been frustrating me. Having to ask someone else just to comment feels humiliating, like I have to lower my head to others just to defend my own arguments. This could’ve easily been handled in a normal CRT discussion instead of being locked behind Staff again. And the worst part is that this is already the second time this has happened to Dragon Ball.
I mean the OP Is proposing the baseline 5C, as it's something the staff members are voting for thereNo offense, but the thread is for the canon debate.
That said you do bring up a good point, maybe we should find a way to calc it using the manga
If you too feel this should be mentioned, I can give permission. Just keep in mind, without an actual calc it wouldn't really be relevant.I mean the OP Is proposing the baseline 5C, as it's something the staff members are voting for there
But the fact that as far as I know, feats of destroying something not necessarily scales to the tier of their namesakes, the planetary feats being vague having varying tiers, and toriyama and Toei not considering that feats can greatly vary dependant of details, even less they fitting our tiering system, all relates to the baseline 5C proposal in some way
If you want, mention whatever of this if you feel like it
I am confused I find it hard to believe before the recent calc was accepted that no one questionedNah, speed feats are fine. Think the only thing to really worry about is a minor downgrade for Roshi's moon feat.
Truth be told, I can understand why the multiplier thread was controversial and agreed a lot of the DB community's points.I am confused I find it hard to believe before the recent calc was accepted that no one questioned
"why use the anime for the time frame or visuals" lol
Nah Re Zero has way more cloud feats and are entirely carried by clouds.
(Even their moon level rating was a cloud feat)
Ok, if you can give me perms pleaseIf you too feel this should be mentioned, I can give permission. Just keep in mind, without an actual calc it wouldn't really be relevant.
That’s not really the issue. Staff CRTs usually pass much faster because the supporters are heavily limited. Before you even realize it, there are already several moderators and administrators agreeing with it while we barely have any room to respond.Surprised it's only the second time if what you're saying is true ngl; usually controversial or popular verses have quite a few
Vaporizing a planet or moon yields results close to the GBE. The reason why most planet-busting feats are higher than their tier is that it's kinetic energy. By moving the mass of the planet multiple times its radius in a second, you're going to get enormous levels of kinetic energy.But the fact that as far as I know, feats of destroying something not necessarily scales to the tier of their namesakes, the planetary feats being vague having varying tiers, and toriyama and Toei not considering that feats can greatly vary dependant of details, even less they fitting our tiering system, all relates to the baseline 5C proposal in some way
Do think like the majority of manga verses are fine with using the anime for visuals/timeframes, like I remember OPM lads were waiting for the anime to adapt the Orochi High 6-A feat to give it a more concrete timeframe and such (S3 OPM happened tho).Truth be told, I can understand why the multiplier thread was controversial and agreed a lot of the DB community's points.
This however, yeah, not sure how this was allowed so long.
It was changed to a staff thread because you would have tried to clutter up, derail and complain as much as possibleWow, the calc guy put the CRT in Staff once again. It seems like he prefers avoiding dealing with the supporters’ arguments, and limiting everyone to a single comment...
Honestly, this whole Staff situation has been frustrating me. Having to ask someone else just to comment feels humiliating, like I have to lower my head to others just to defend my own arguments. This could’ve easily been handled in a normal CRT discussion instead of being locked behind Staff again. And the worst part is that this is already the second time this has happened to Dragon Ball.
Didn't need to do that in the soul manip removal CRT, it went pretty smoothly.It was changed to a staff thread because you would have tried to clutter up, derail and complain as much as possible
Think it's case-by-case; when an adaptation is straight-up a different canon or has major changes, don't think we allow it. Not sure what's the case with OPM tbhDo think like the majority of manga verses are fine with using the anime for visuals/timeframes, like I remember OPM lads were waiting for the anime to adapt the Orochi High 6-A feat to give it a more concrete timeframe and such (S3 OPM happened tho).
Yeah, I can understand your sentiments. And I think lots of staff do as well, which is why (usually) they don't close immediately after grace (Like the DB multiplier thread). Additionally, staff do try to be open and give permission (hence why I'm here specifically for example, to make sure supporters get to have a say)That’s not really the issue. Staff CRTs usually pass much faster because the supporters are heavily limited. Before you even realize it, there are already several moderators and administrators agreeing with it while we barely have any room to respond.
It would be far more fair to face us in a normal CRT where everyone can freely comment and debate. In Staff threads, it takes forever just to get permission to comment, which makes it extremely difficult to properly defend our arguments.
Cool, check out Goku Black laughing now.It was changed to a staff thread because you would have tried to clutter up, derail and complain as much as possible
Is like, only two guys who does that.Re zero had ap ratings? I thought they all cut concepts or smth
If the standards your using allows anime visuals for calculations, there is no reason to say it is overstated the change purposed is a standard change, how it was stated by the previous standard was fine and how it will be stated with the new standard is fine. You simply disagree with one of the standards.Turning a feat that was clearly moon level in the manga into planet level just because the anime shows more exaggerated visuals overstates the original intent.
Alright it's a general thread now.That’s not really the issue. Staff CRTs usually pass much faster because the supporters are heavily limited. Before you even realize it, there are already several moderators and administrators agreeing with it while we barely have any room to respond.
It would be far more fair to face us in a normal CRT where everyone can freely comment and debate. In Staff threads, it takes forever just to get permission to comment, which makes it extremely difficult to properly defend our arguments.
Girl that can't happenSo if the manga version of a feat is explicitly High 8-C but a calc using the anime version grants 5-A you would use the anime version because it grants higher results
Such a difference would require the feats to be so radically different that it wouldn't be considered faithful enough to the manga by the old standards. So you are simply wrongSo if the manga version of a feat is explicitly High 8-C but a calc using the anime version grants 5-A you would use the anime version
theyre scaling country level off of a 10th cloud featRe zero had ap ratings? I thought they all cut concepts or smth
well thats exactly whats happening with db rnSuch a difference would require the feats to be so radically different that it wouldn't be considered faithful enough to the manga by the old standards.
Thanks for the clarification, I appreciate it. I understand the concern about keeping the thread on-topic and avoiding unnecessary spam or meme posts.Alright it's a general thread now.
But I'm going to tell all of you this now. The reason it got moved is that it's a relatively minor CRT and it's not expected to be controversial. If the DB side derails by spamming memes or off-topic discussion points (such as single-word responses, insults, or non-contributing posts), it'll be moved back, and that makes every future thread about this likely to be a Staff Thread as well. If you need to comment, you can, but make sure it's relevant and on topic with the overall point of the CRT.
Namek's destructionGirl that can't happen
I fail to see how. We simply do not get a interpretation of the moon being desptryed it happens off panel making calculating it rather difficult, using a faithful anime version for it was the next best option.well thats exactly whats happening with db rn
That ain't cause of KE shenanigans thoNamek's destruction
Well ya but it wasn't used under the old standards so? What robo is saying dosen't really apply to thisNamek's destruction
EDIT for those who don't know what I'm referring to, Toei Frieza's destruction of Namek is 4-A+ unlike the manga.
![]()
DBZ Toei: Namek Frieza stuff
vsbattles.fandom.com
To be fair that feat even has statement acknowledging how FAR more than just namek was destroyed (unlike the manga), while Roshis feat in manga and anime is destroying the moon, nothing else, just different details/having more detailsNamek's destruction
EDIT for those who don't know what I'm referring to, Toei Frieza's destruction of Namek is 4-A+ unlike the manga.
![]()
DBZ Toei: Namek Frieza stuff
vsbattles.fandom.com
In OPM the anime removed a single word, which moved Boros from High 6-A to 5-B.Of course, just clarifying we have had situations where a massive jump in tiers from the same feat across adaptations has occured.
WowIn OPM the anime removed a single word, which moved Boros from High 6-A to 5-B.
"Planet's surface" to "Planet"Wow
How did that happen?
Only time an adaptation doesn't add to the material yet somehow upgrades them regardless hahaIn OPM the anime removed a single word, which moved Boros from High 6-A to 5-B.