• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

An Attempt to bring back a Verse (Terrible Mouse)

South Park has coherent intelligent satirical stories, and definitely does not endorse horrible behaviour, so that one seems unnecessary to ask about, but we likely need to write a draft text for what exactly that we should ask Sannse.
I think presenting specific examples that have been brought up in this thread would do a lot to probe what we want to look out for.

We have confirmation that Terrible Mouse is viewed as too far, so that one is unnecessary. But asking about Terrifier, Yandere Simulator, Hatred, and South Park seem like the most immediately relevant verses. All of these have a Fandom wiki, but all of them have some level of questionability of being permitted based on Sannse's first response.
Here's a first draft:

There's currently a lot of confusion on exactly what would qualify as shock content.
The following is a list of verses under question, along with a short explanation:
  • Yandere Simulator: While the gore isn't 'detailed' per-se, the majority of the game centers around torturing and killing high school students for the sake of eliminating competition for a romantic obsession. The game features things like drowning your classmates in toilets, torturing your classmates in an iron maiden, bullying your classmates until they commit suicide, and taking upskirt creep-shots of your classmates to use as blackmail.
  • Hatred: The majority of the game centers around slaughtering crowds of innocent civilians as a lone gunman on a mass-murder campaign.
  • South Park: The series features various scenes depicting the brutal deaths of children, often played off as a joke.
  • Terrifier: The movie is about a crazy clown that stalks and kills three women, infamous for being excessive with its torture scenes which go on for a long time and in extreme detail.
All of these properties currently have a wiki on Fandom. We were wondering where these things would fall within this policy, and if there's any nuance we're currently missing. We've created a draft text for a rule, and would like to know if it seems to align with Fandom's guidelines on the topic:

[Insert Rule Draft]
 
Last edited:
I think the main issue here is that "Blood and gore=bad" is being taken to the extreme. The presence of violence against children shouldn't be against policy, it's when the primary focus is directly on these things that I'd say it becomes level 4.

Terrible Mouse has little of note beyond the gore against children that isn't also bad. A verse like South Park does not focus on that particular joke in exclusivity. Like at all. It's not even a once an episode thing. And I don't like South Park.
 
I feel maybe one thing thats affecting our perception of this 'Terrible Mouse' compared to the other things is its artstyle and 'cutesy' gacha look. It makes it look more like its for bringing in younger audiences (or would be appealing to such). I dont think we need it on the wiki in general as some web series that just happens to have a lot of views (never heard of it till now), but i think we can clearly distinguish intent behind media. (i think we're getting too comfortable with standards of web series in general tbh. Theres a page for a series of tiktok greenscreen skits)

I dont think we need to be questioning stuff like South Park though. And yeah, Terrifier is excessive (art the clown is brought up in a lot of vs discussion tbf) but you cant really penalize a horror title for being a horror. If anything, his profile should probably be less detailed.

You can get rid of Yandere Simulator purely for its legacy though. That should definitely be a factor imo
 
I don't personally think South Park or Terrifier will qualify, but I do think it will help get to the meat of the issue to hear Sannse explain why in their own words.
Honestly, I think we should wait until we hear what he has to say about this.

We want to rely on what Fandom thinks, but we don’t even know exactly what Fandom thinks, considering that everything we’re citing has a Wiki on Fandom, which may or may not prove the legitimacy of the verse in question. It depends on whether the verse is simply ignored, unknown, or doesn’t break any Fandom rules.
 
We have confirmation that Terrible Mouse is viewed as too far
I don't even buy that confirmation.

Neither Ant nor Sannse have watched it in full. It's ban via telephone. Properly looking into it, they could very easily find that it doesn't qualify.
Well we really only had problems with the word gore I think, since we didn't want to give the impression that something like SAW wasn't allowed. I think we should keep the wording less specific, since we later clarify with examples.

Keeping in line with looking at the intention/focus, maybe changing the first line to something like:

Level 4: Extreme - Verses that place a central focus on either high sexual content or shock content.

I think that wording works because if you look it up, Wikipedia defines shock sites (and the content therein) as "a website that is intended to be offensive or disturbing to its viewers... or which contain hate speech and dehumanization..."

This is the exact term Sannse used, and would also cover verses which we don't allow for things like excessive use of slurs and hate speech.

If you want to really hammer in the intention part, and avoid the argument that some media needs to be disturbing for its message, then maybe you could add the word sadistic, like:

Level 4: Extreme - Verses that place a central focus on either high sexual content or sadistic shock content.
I still really dislike this wording because it is something that has SIGNIFICANT variance in opinion without people.

See here, we have people saying that Yandere Simulator is obviously shock content, while myself and others contend that it obviously is just a stealth assassination/dating sim game based on a trope in Japanese culture that almost always occurs in high schools; making the murder/dismemberment of 17-year-olds the result of cultural happenstance, rather than being chosen for shock value.

The dichotomy between people saying "This is just meant to shock people" and "This is actually meant to be art" is strong, and exists with many other pieces of media. Contrapoints' recent video on Saw talks about this a fair bit.

Hey, that could actually be a good example to ask about.
Here's a first draft:

There's currently a lot of confusion on exactly what would qualify as shock content.
The following is a list of verses under question, along with a short explanation:
  • Yandere Simulator: While the gore isn't 'detailed' per-se, the majority of the game centers around torturing and killing high school students for the sake of eliminating competition for a romantic obsession. The game features things like drowning your classmates in toilets, torturing your classmates in an iron maiden, bullying your classmates until they commit suicide, and taking upskirt creep-shots of your classmates to use as blackmail.
  • Hatred: The majority of the game centers around slaughtering crowds of innocent civilians as a lone gunman on a mass-murder campaign.
  • South Park: The series features various scenes depicting the brutal deaths of children, often played off as a joke.
  • Terrifier: The movie is about a crazy clown that stalks and kills three women, infamous for being excessive with its torture scenes which go on for a long time and in extreme detail.
All of these properties currently have a wiki on Fandom. We were wondering where these things would fall within this policy, and if there's any nuance we're currently missing. We've created a draft text for a rule, and would like to know if it seems to align with Fandom's guidelines on the topic:

[Insert Draft]
Sannse did also mention "violence against children being sexual" as a disqualifier, and South Park the Stick of Truth infamously has a scene where your character is kidnapped, restrained, and you have to pass a QTE properly clinching your sphincter to stop an anal probe clearly shaped like a *****.

I also talked to Bambu off-site about Gone, a YA novel series that includes the kinds of gory things done in Yandere Simulator, in more gruesome detail, by and to younger characters. But he seemed to think it was fine because it was done in the context of what's essentially a war.

It covers a world where certain people in a town gained superpowers, and one of those, an autistic infant, used their powers to expel everyone above the age of 14, cutting off all interaction with the outside world. Immediately many died or were injured in car crashes, due to not being connected to the outside world many ran low on food. And an awful group of bullies from one of the town's schools used the opportunity to climb the ladder of power and torture others.

One character ended up carwrecked in the desert, and had to desperately try to find help while she was injured, and hunted by rabid, mutated animals. A character with super speed was dismembered by running through a hallway that was trapped with piano wire strung across it. A character was magically inflicted with unbearable pain until they killed themselves. Since most powers come from people's hands, the bullies, in their territory of control, force many to walk around with their hands set in concrete, slowly rotting away.
Terrible Mouse has little of note beyond the gore against children that isn't also bad.
Welp, I guess I need to watch it so I can properly engage with comments like this.
 
Last edited:
Sannse did also mention "violence against children being sexual" as a disqualifier, and South Park the Stick of Truth infamously has a scene where your character is kidnapped, restrained, and you have to pass a QTE properly clinching your sphincter to stop an anal probe clearly shaped like a *****.
That would probably be a good thing to mention too then.
 
I do also have to wonder how we'd handle other kinds of stories focused around torture. Whump (also known as Hurt/Comfort) is a term primarily applied to fanfiction (although there are original, published examples) for stories that focus around characters being brutally, graphically, extensively tortured, and then freed and comforted by their friends, sometimes cycling in and out of these.

The vast majority of these stories would have adults being victimised, but that didn't seem to be Sannse's sole criteria. A large portion of these stories are simply convenient avenues to get to these torture/healing scenes (as a large portion of action stories are simply convenient avenues to get to action scenes). And some of these stories do have sexual aspects to the violence. So would we also have to disallow those?
Welp, I guess I need to watch it so I can properly engage with comments like this.
32 minutes through watching Terrible Mouse and I have no idea how someone could've gotten this far and seen it as having "little of note beyond the gore against children".

The disclaimer at the start said they're all adults. ig a lot of the characters have adolescent-seeming designs, but they're animal-human hybrids being experimented on in a hospital. It seems quite hard to get any good indicators from that.

Plus, there is a lot more to this than just gore. It seems like a pretty typical story of bad things happening to people being experimented on by a mad scientist. It has a fifth of the violence in something like Madness Combat.
 
Anyway, we still need to write a draft for a letter to Sannse that asks for the specifications that we require here. 🙏
 
Basically, in order to not move around in circles here, we need to write a draft for concrete summary letter that mentions what we need to ask Sannse about this. 🙏
 
I mean, what wording exists that will not be open to interpretation but also cover all our bases?
It depends on what our bases actually end up being.

But a "central focus on shock content" is very easily readable as meaning we'd be disallowing just about every slasher film.
 
It depends on what our bases actually end up being.

But a "central focus on shock content" is very easily readable as meaning we'd be disallowing just about every slasher film.
I can certainly see that, though I'm unsure of a good replacement that doesn't become so specific that we'd be open to a hundred different loopholes or inversely become too strict. But, again, to be fair- these are the actual words they used. Well, other than 'torture ****'.

It will definitely be easier to adopt more appropriate vocabulary once we're certain what Fandom's policies are, yes.
 
Here's a first draft:

There's currently a lot of confusion on exactly what would qualify as shock content.
The following is a list of verses under question, along with a short explanation:
  • Yandere Simulator: While the gore isn't 'detailed' per-se, the majority of the game centers around torturing and killing high school students for the sake of eliminating competition for a romantic obsession. The game features things like drowning your classmates in toilets, torturing your classmates in an iron maiden, bullying your classmates until they commit suicide, and taking upskirt creep-shots of your classmates to use as blackmail.
  • Hatred: The majority of the game centers around slaughtering crowds of innocent civilians as a lone gunman on a mass-murder campaign.
  • South Park: The series features various scenes depicting the brutal deaths of children, often played off as a joke.
  • Terrifier: The movie is about a crazy clown that stalks and kills three women, infamous for being excessive with its torture scenes which go on for a long time and in extreme detail.
All of these properties currently have a wiki on Fandom. We were wondering where these things would fall within this policy, and if there's any nuance we're currently missing. We've created a draft text for a rule, and would like to know if it seems to align with Fandom's guidelines on the topic:

[Insert Rule Draft]
This list feels kind of lacking.
No Danganronpa, but It's dark comedy with sadistic death games ending in violence towards minors via elaborate torture machines.
No Attack on Titan, but it has graphic violence towards children most notably
No Blood-C, Elfen Lied, or Madoka Magica. Stop by TV tropes to get caught up on what those have to offer cause it's a lot.

Those are just franchises that that happen to be VS wiki. You could probably throw Corpse Party in there too.
 
Basically, in order to not move around in circles here, we need to write a draft for concrete summary letter that mentions what we need to ask Sannse about this. 🙏
 
Are you looking for literally the whole question, like including an introduction and niceties and stuff?
 
This list feels kind of lacking.
No Danganronpa, but It's dark comedy with sadistic death games ending in violence towards minors via elaborate torture machines.
No Attack on Titan, but it has graphic violence towards children most notably
No Blood-C, Elfen Lied, or Madoka Magica. Stop by TV tropes to get caught up on what those have to offer cause it's a lot.

Those are just franchises that that happen to be VS wiki. You could probably throw Corpse Party in there too.
We're not hammering Sannse with an exhaustive list. We're testing certain parameters to nail down specifics. I think YanSim basically covers what Blood-C and Elfen Lied has to offer, although the brutality in those two are more explicit, so maybe toss Blood-C onto the pile for the hell of it.
Basically, in order to not move around in circles here, we need to write a draft for concrete summary letter that mentions what we need to ask Sannse about this. 🙏
I do not enjoy being a secretary. It is most often the case that people will edit things to say what they wanted to say anyways, defeating the point. Nevertheless:

Hello.

Our community would like further insight regarding the acceptability of verses, based on their gore and shock content. Previously, you described detailed torture and murder of children as crossing the line, "especially if it has any sexual elements". However, our community is not absolutely certain how to interpret this, so we are approaching you again to ask for clarification. We have prepared a list of examples in order to test this, as previously you gave the examples of Saw and Final Destination as acceptable content. The following examples all have a Fandom wiki currently.
  • Terrifier: As a movie franchise, involves the brutal murder of dozens of victims, including children (though never on-screen). Most of the methods of murder displayed would explicitly classify as torture, and most likely shock content, including skinning and scalping a victim alive, chainsawing a restrained victim slowly down the middle, and restraining a victim to a chair to freeze-dry them, only to break off chunks of their body with a hammer afterwards as they watch. The deaths of children are not depicted on screen but explicitly occur with the same fervor.
  • Hatred: An infamous video game that is solely about the mass murder of innocent civilians, often in brutal detail (such as knocking a victim to the ground and executing them). There is little narrative beyond the slaughter of these civilians. I do not believe any children are depicted dying in it. The important question here is whether shock content such as this alone is objectionable.
  • Yandere Simulator: One of many examples of a mainstream verse depicting the sadistic and extreme murder of children. However, the "yandere" trope is extremely common, and whether it is used for shock value is debatable. It includes tying schoolgirls to chairs and torturing them at length, pulling students into running fans by the hair (resulting in their death), and driving characters to suicide, juxtaposed against a more traditional dating simulator. The developer has stated that they are all 18 or older, though he has stated that this is solely for legal reasons; "People ***** at me if they are not 18".
  • South Park: This should require little introduction; a running gag of the series is extreme violence, in particular leveled at Kenny McCormick, age 8 to 9. He is frequently mutilated, decapitated, electrocuted, or burned alive, only to return next episode.
  • Blood-C: An anime (and associated properties) that follows a monster slayer in high school; it is infamous for its depictions of violence against children. High school children are bisected, crushed, impaled, and ripped limb from limb in gruesome detail. I cannot recall anything that would be classified as "torture", but it would be very easy to describe what is depicted as "shock content".
It is our hope that by offering these examples, we can determine a more specific outline by which we can judge franchises for inclusion on our wiki. Thank you.
 
We're not hammering Sannse with an exhaustive list. We're testing certain parameters to nail down specifics. I think YanSim basically covers what Blood-C and Elfen Lied has to offer, although the brutality in those two are more explicit, so maybe toss Blood-C onto the pile for the hell of it.

I do not enjoy being a secretary. It is most often the case that people will edit things to say what they wanted to say anyways, defeating the point. Nevertheless:
Any user or low-powered staff with a brain can actually somewhat defend the line between this and Terrible mouse. Terrible mouse is by pattern often framed as a somewhat coherent horror plotline of a bunch of kids or kid-lookalikes trying to escape a furry volutpous-designed mouse.

Terrifier, Hatred, and Blood-C: No really depicting explicit violence or fatal injury of children preteen and under

Yandere Simulator: Somewhat optional to kill/torture everyone and a bunch of teens aren't equal to the framing of a bunch of 18 year-olds being portrayed as kids being tortured.

South Park: It's portrayed as a comedy, not a glorifying horror show.

Judging by my spectation of the thread (yes, I don't mind my replies being glazed over on occasion, I initially came to the wiki just to read), I'm pretty sure Terrible mouse is getting banished from being on-site because it's explicitly centralized on portraying kids or kid-like adults getting tortured in some horror and sexual presented way with not much substance beyond.

You guys had a long history of blocking out bad precedents despite vague rules, is it that big of a deal we'd need to be more specific on why we disallow terrible mouse compared to something like SAW, Walking Dead, Yandere Sim or [X contender verse that could get deleted because of this policy)?
 
Any user or low-powered staff with a brain can actually somewhat defend the line between this and Terrible mouse. Terrible mouse is by pattern often framed as a somewhat coherent horror plotline of a bunch of kids or kid-lookalikes trying to escape a furry volutpous-designed mouse.

Terrifier, Hatred, and Blood-C: No really depicting explicit violence or fatal injury of children preteen and under

Yandere Simulator: Somewhat optional to kill/torture everyone and a bunch of teens aren't equal to the framing of a bunch of 18 year-olds being portrayed as kids being tortured.

South Park: It's portrayed as a comedy, not a glorifying horror show.

Judging by my spectation of the thread (yes, I don't mind my replies being glazed over on occasion, I initially came to the wiki just to read), I'm pretty sure Terrible mouse is getting banished from being on-site because it's explicitly centralized on portraying kids or kid-like adults getting tortured in some horror and sexual presented way with not much substance beyond.

You guys had a long history of blocking out bad precedents despite vague rules, is it that big of a deal we'd need to be more specific on why we disallow terrible mouse compared to something like SAW, Walking Dead, Yandere Sim or [X contender verse that could get deleted because of this policy)?
I will note, again, that this rule isn't something I'm pushing for.

These examples have been brought up by others as something they, personally, believe would fall against the rule. I disagreed above, although I felt Terrifier was arguable (it does feature the murder of children, also, which is significant enough; Blood-C's children not being "preteen" doesn't seem to matter). So we have to parse this out. For what it's worth, I agree with you-- I think Terrible Mouse is obviously a lot worse than any of these. But this is not a universally held belief, so we take it to Fandom for clarification, because Fandom has the final say, bad precedent or not.
 
I have sent Bambu's letter to Sannse now. 🙏
 
Oh, Bambu's one didn't include the extra South Park stuff.

Damn.
 
Sannse has replied. 🙏

"Hello,

I don't know any of these franchises, other than South Park, so I'm limited in what I can say. In general, excess detail and graphic images can make a mild franchise go over the top. Leaving out the details and being careful with images can help (although the strength of the media is still important)

Terrifier: sounds like Final Destination. Okay, but don't get too graphic with the details (e.g. probably an image of the skinning would be too shocking.

Hatred: If the deaths aren't graphic, they are okay.

Yandere Simulator: This topic is flagged for review. In particular for the deaths by suicide. I don't know when we will fully assess it.

South Park: The deaths are cartoon-like and not realistic. We allow this

Blood-C: Sounds like it goes too far into shock especially as it involves children

I hope that helps,
Regards,

-- Sannse"
 
If the strength of the media itself is important than on the topic of Terrible Mouse I don't see why it would be a problem. Based on what has been said here (and by the fact that Terrible Mouse has an active FANDOM wiki) it doesn't seem to just be mindless child murder shock content.
 
Okay, so it sounds like the gore needs to be extremely detailed/realistic and mostly targeted at some innocent or childlike group.

Multiple examples satisfy one of those criteria but not both, and those ones they say are fine so long as we don't show it.

I'm not entirely sure what to make of suicide being a particular note, though.
 
Last edited:
I think that we can write a new version of my earlier draft for new rules and then ask Sannse about if it needs to be adjusted. 🙏
 
In Yandere Simulator. There is a really dark feature where you can kidnap someone, break their mind with torture, and order them to murder someone, then make them commit suicide afterwards. That's probably why it is flagged for review.
 
If the strength of the media itself is important than on the topic of Terrible Mouse I don't see why it would be a problem. Based on what has been said here (and by the fact that Terrible Mouse has an active FANDOM wiki) it doesn't seem to just be mindless child murder shock content.
What do you base this assessment on, out of curiosity? I've watched an amount of it at this point that I would rather not, and it seems to be pretty much exactly this. The mere presence of something resembling a plot doesn't dismiss the fact that it is pretty much just this: child murder for shock value.

That said, I find Sannse's response odd (again!), because Terrible Mouse does depict extremely violent and torturous deaths of children, but it is also very much unrealistic in how it depicts it. She mentioned South Park being so cartoonish as to not be taken seriously, and maybe that defense doesn't extend to the lengths Terrible Mouse takes with its extremes, but there lies, now, another question.
 
In Yandere Simulator. There is a really dark feature where you can kidnap someone, break their mind with torture, and order them to murder someone, then make them commit suicide afterwards. That's probably why it is flagged for review.
Yes, but that doesn't actually depict realistic gore, which is seemingly the focus of the rest of their evaluations.

It suggests that it's somehow special because it involves suicide, which is throwing an entirely new concern into this mix.
 
I find Sannse's response odd (again!), because Terrible Mouse does depict extremely violent and torturous deaths of children, but it is also very much unrealistic in how it depicts it. She mentioned South Park being so cartoonish as to not be taken seriously, and maybe that defense doesn't extend to the lengths Terrible Mouse takes with its extremes, but there lies, now, another question.
Well, I am not sure what exactly that we should ask Sannse this time, but we should at least provide a draft for a rule text, so she gets something more concrete to work with. 🙏
 
Does this mean they are revising the Yandere Simulator fandom wiki?
I found it a bit strange because he said Yandere Simulator is being revised (the fandom wiki, I think? That's how I interpreted it), but he didn't mention the Terrible Mouse wiki. Which, whether you like it or not, is the focus of this thread.

Yes, but that doesn't actually depict realistic gore, which is seemingly the focus of the rest of their evaluations.

It suggests that it's somehow special because it involves suicide, which is throwing an entirely new concern into this mix.
Realistic in what sense? Like Cannibal Holocaust which has real animal deaths? Technically Mortal Kombat has "realistic" gore, in the sense that the physiology of the characters is extremely detailed, but at the same time the tone of the game isn't exactly serious.
 
That said, I find Sannse's response odd (again!), because Terrible Mouse does depict extremely violent and torturous deaths of children, but it is also very much unrealistic in how it depicts it. She mentioned South Park being so cartoonish as to not be taken seriously, and maybe that defense doesn't extend to the lengths Terrible Mouse takes with its extremes, but there lies, now, another question.
Well, reading between the lines, it seems like they're not exactly making these decisions based off any rigid set of rules, but are instead just making a best-judgement conclusion based on the context and content.

From that perspective, it's undeniable that the vibes of the two things are very different, even if in a literal sense the content reaches the same level of violence.

If I'm tying that into them not liking suicide, it strikes me that they simply don't like when it gets too dark and edgy. South Park is gory, but it's also silly.

If we're trying to make a policy, I think that brings us back to the shocking content being the primary focus.
 
I've seen people bring up happy tree friends being on the wiki as an argument but like why don't we nuke tree friends its basically just a gorefest too
 
I looked through the community guidelines, and found this:
  • "Shock" includes any image or video that is likely to upset or horrify the viewer. For example, screamers, images of gruesome accidents, animal cruelty, ****, or faeces.
  • Images of suicide are also treated as "shock". Suicide might be mentioned in an article but rarely needs to be illustrated. Encouraging someone to kill or harm themselves is strictly banned - even if it's just a meme saying "kys".
Here they use the word shock too, and also once again they hold suicide in special regard as being particularly shocking.
I know this isn't about fictional content necessarily, but I do think it corroborates their philosophy.

So I think our draft should still use that word, and I suppose should also elevate suicide in particular.
 
I've seen people bring up happy tree friends being on the wiki as an argument but like why don't we nuke tree friends its basically just a gorefest too
Cartoon anthro animals aren't really comparable to cartoon children, and to the best of my knowledge (which is old! it's been a long time!), Happy Tree Friends doesn't have incest **** or even torture, either. It's just really gorey, and we've made the distinction a dozen times, I think, that gore isn't what is being targeted here. If you have something in particular you think warrants comparison, point it out specifically rather than vaguely gesturing to the verse again, please.
I looked through the community guidelines, and found this:

Here they use the word shock too, and also once again they hold suicide in special regard as being particularly shocking.

So I think our draft should still use that word, and I suppose should also elevate suicide in particular.
That makes sense. Would also explain why they're deliberating internally on Yandere Simulator. I agree with you, then.
 
Do works that contain incest break the rules of the wiki fandom?
Because, again, a work like The Coffin of Andy & Leyley is present in the fandom.
I can't find any particular mention of incest in any of their policy pages.

However, what we just inferred is that they must take the overall vibe into account, and something like that will certainly make the vibe edgier and thus more likely to be considered overall too shocking.
 
What do you base this assessment on, out of curiosity? I've watched an amount of it at this point that I would rather not, and it seems to be pretty much exactly this. The mere presence of something resembling a plot doesn't dismiss the fact that it is pretty much just this: child murder for shock value.
Perhaps I simply misinterpreted what we (or rather Sannse's) consider to be "shock content" for engagement. If it contains some semblance of a cohesive narrative and justification for the violence then I would consider it to be more than simple shock value, but that's just my personal belief and evidently, it's not shared. I don't feel very strongly about this particular subject, but I would like to know where exactly we draw the line between "excessive violence with a strong narrative to offset it" and "excessive violence for the sake of excessive violence," as it seems to be highly subjective and something that seems difficult to apply in a rule that users need to follow.
 
Back
Top