Randomuser3412
He/Him- 839
- 496
What? they're in the background and he's in the foreground... This isn't relevant to the thread, anyway.He had the moon on his side...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What? they're in the background and he's in the foreground... This isn't relevant to the thread, anyway.He had the moon on his side...
Ok maybe I didn't explain it well. You also probably mess up chronology because you didn't watch beyond first two episodes, so maybe that's my point is not going through. So I will give a last attempt, if not then oh well.Snip
Who is "we" lol?Caine sucks at making fake backgrounds. They are blatantly cartoonish with five point ends in episode 5, where star gazing happens. However in episode 4, where Gangle scene occurs, they are shown to be very realistic. You'd say he just got better, but episode 4 goes before episode 5. This is basically my point as to why episode 4 must be real, because his fake ones are very blatantly bad. Maybe Gangle wouldn't know and have any reaction, but we do see it is real. I used the fact that Gangle wanted something realistic as supportive as to why he would choose to make them real in episode 4.
One, nobody ever brought up issues with this.He had the moon on his side...
Has this already been discussed? Like, he's 7-B/class G because of that.Now we'll have to discuss the size of those damn sun and moon.
Lifting Strength: Class G (Has consistently been referred to by his creations as a God, the Sun, who is able to move her body weighing this much, and the Fudge, who is able to support his massive body on land which weighs this much.Pushed all of the main cast (minus Zooble) into a portal to the Candy Canyon Kingdom, including Pomni, who can snapped a lollipop's stick with this amount of force
I don't imagine it'd be any less than this... but the Wackywatch showed Pomni in the void being 3 km out from where Caine was, if that's helpful(?)If anything is to make this up, I can recalculate the feat by calculating the distance Caine travelled based on the Grounds no longer being visible after Caine travelled far enough into the Z-Axis. There's 21 hours until this gets applied anyway.
Caine was in special restaurant realm which can be however far away from main island, so not really methinks.I don't imagine it'd be any less than this... but the Wackywatch showed Pomni in the void being 3 km out from where Caine was, if that's helpful(?)
^^^okay what the actual f*ck is this travesty
Downgrade should be obvious. It's a digital world, so we should naturally just assume that it's a skybox. Instead we have people arguing "B-b-but you can't prove it isn't 4-A!" Come on man. Obviously Caine isn't actually out there making star systems. It literally does nothing for him when he can make the Circus just as immersive with a fake skybox that looks real.
Occam's Razor people.
So it can be closed?OP makes sense.
OP kindly please put English back.Setelah membaca blog ini:
Saya benar-benar tidak mengerti mengapa prestasi ini digunakan untuk membenarkan kecepatan MFTL+ (lebih cepat dari kecepatan cahaya).
Seluruh perhitungan tampaknya mengasumsikan bahwa Void sangat jauh dari Grounds, tetapi… mengapa? Dalam cerita aslinya, Void benar-benar mengelilingi Grounds ( Ini atau Ini ). Anda tidak perlu menempuh jarak antar bintang untuk mencapainya, Anda hanya perlu melangkah keluar dari Grounds dan Anda sudah berada di sana. Grounds sendiri terletak tepat di tengah Void, jadi memperlakukan ini sebagai perjalanan jarak jauh terasa janggal sejak awal.
Yang lebih membingungkan saya adalah kalkulator tersebut memperlakukan Void dan Grounds seolah-olah keduanya berada di dimensi yang terpisah. Padahal TADC adalah dunia digital. Dalam konteks itu, Void jelas berfungsi sebagai area ruang yang belum dirender atau belum selesai yang belum dibangun oleh pengembang, dan itulah sebabnya Void kosong. Hanya Grounds yang benar-benar dirender dan dapat diakses.
Lalu ada anggapan bahwa area tersebut cukup luas untuk menampung matahari, bulan, dan bintang. Itu sama sekali tidak masuk akal. Yang kita lihat adalah latar langit. Langit yang terlihat terbatas pada skala sebuah pulau kecil, bukan struktur kosmik yang sebenarnya. Jika kita mulai memperlakukan setiap latar belakang dekoratif sebagai astronomi literal, semuanya akan menjadi konyol dengan sangat cepat.
Ungkapan "prasmanan kosmik" di sini juga memiliki makna yang jauh lebih dalam dari seharusnya. "Kosmik" tidak selalu berarti luar angkasa. Ungkapan ini, yang berasal dari Caine, seorang pembawa acara yang selalu melebih-lebihkan dan berbicara dengan bahasa yang mencolok dan berlebihan, terdengar lebih seperti gaya puitis atau hiperbola. Bisa saja itu merujuk pada beragam petualangan dan tema yang tersedia, bukan sesuatu yang berukuran astronomis.
Kesimpulan:
Jadi ya, saya kesulitan memahami bagaimana pencapaian ini mendukung MFTL+ sama sekali. Asumsi di balik perhitungan tersebut tidak benar-benar sesuai dengan bagaimana dunia The Amazing Digital Circus sebenarnya disajikan, yang membuat peringkat tersebut terasa lebih dipaksakan daripada dibenarkan.
Dan karena uraian di atas telah membahas penciptaan benda-benda langit seperti matahari, bulan, dan bintang yang tidak relevan, maka 4A dapat dihapus dan Caine dapat kembali ke tingkat kota yang lebih tinggi.
Setuju: @Damage3245, Anonymous_Learner, Randomuser3412, Ednaxel2, Kellex, IDK3465, Mommyleona, Flowerguy2, StrymULTRA
Netral:
Tidak setuju: Alexander
48 hours after the thread's opening needs to pass first before closing.So it can be closed?
I'm also confused why it changedOP kindly please put English back.
Someone messed with the automatic translator smhI'm also confused why it changed![]()
Here's the recalcIf anything is to make this up, I can recalculate the feat by calculating the distance Caine travelled based on the Grounds no longer being visible after Caine travelled far enough into the Z-Axis. There's 21 hours until this gets applied anyway.
The downgrade makes sense to me
Given how you commented on this thread, can you take a look at the recalc?A "cosmos" doesn't have a singular or minimum size as far as I'm aware.
It not technically being a game doesn’t change anything. Games are virtual worlds as well. Only difference between the two is intended use (and they literally use it as a game world).This is not a game, it doesn't work like a game, it is more of a simulation than a game.
Or you know...there is this game called NO-MAN SKY!
With cartoon logic?and Caine treats this has if it was a show, not a gameIt not technically being a game doesn’t change anything. Games are virtual worlds as well. Only difference between the two is intended use (and they literally use it as a game world).
It's been said many times that it doesn't matter. it is digital and using binary code for world development.With cartoon logic?and Caine treats this has if it was a show, not a game
So are DDLC and UTDR.It's been said many times that it doesn't matter. it is digital and using binary code for world development.
I don’t see how cartoon logic changes much either tbh, if anything that makes it less likely Cain bothered with a realistic cosmos.With cartoon logic?and Caine treats this has if it was a show, not a game
So are DDLC and UTDR.
Using instances of fake stars is good and all, but “game/simulation so must be small” is a very poor argument. Just because the former works doesn’t mean the latter does too.
Do you think a game program would be bigger or smaller than an entire solar system exactly?So are DDLC and UTDR.
Using instances of fake stars is good and all, but “game/simulation so must be small” is a very poor argument. Just because the former works doesn’t mean the latter does too.
agreeDo you think a game program would be bigger or smaller than an entire solar system exactly?
Especially when the stars and background are NOT the important part of the adventures like? If Caine made an adventure where you space travelled to other environments then maybe you'd have an argument
Definitely think its obvious which option is the safest to go with...
Huh, Sub-Rel, that's actually quite a bit faster than I expected, like, I was fully prepared for Caine's flight speed to be downgraded to around Mach 3 or something
So are DDLC and UTDR.
Using instances of fake stars is good and all, but “game/simulation so must be small” is a very poor argument. Just because the former works doesn’t mean the latter does too.
People, again, the reason why DDLC is not 11-C rn is because of it having:Do you think a game program would be bigger or smaller than an entire solar system exactly?
Especially when the stars and background are NOT the important part of the adventures like? If Caine made an adventure where you space travelled to other environments then maybe you'd have an argument
Definitely think its obvious which option is the safest to go with...
My point was debunking “videogame = should be small/cannot be big” myth. I was not saying TADC has insane amounts of context as other games. It’s as simple as disproof via counterexample, that’s it.
Yeah but you also should not be using these verses as counter when they have a lot of evidence to disprove them not being universe sized. Context matters, you should use other examples that would fit more with TADC's nature, not meta videogames lol.My point was debunking “videogame = should be small/cannot be big” myth. I was not saying TADC has insane amounts of context as other games. It’s as simple as disproof via counterexample, that’s it.
When it is necessary to prove that not all swans in the pond are white, it suffices to prove the existence of at least one black, or purple, or golden one, and so on. Even if I’m saying the swan in the pond is gray, I can still use a purple one to disprove a statement that all swans in the pond are white, even if purple is not remotely comparable to gray.Yeah but you also should not be using these verses as counter when they have a lot of evidence to disprove them not being universe sized. Context matters, you should use other examples that would fit more with TADC's nature, not meta videogames lol.
This need of yours to be right all the time at all costs is annoying ngl. Counterexamples have to be comparable in order to even be used in the argument, otherwise they're false equivalences.When it is necessary to prove that not all swans in the pond are white, it suffices to prove the existence of at least one black, or purple, or golden one, and so on. Even if I’m saying the swan in the pond is gray, I can still use a purple one to disprove a statement that all swans in the pond are white, even if purple is not remotely comparable to gray.
It’s the essence of how the disproof of universal statements via counterexample works. You just need a counterexample, regardless of how similar it is to the supposed hypothesis/theory.
When it is necessary to prove that not all swans in the pond are white, it suffices to prove the existence of at least one black, or purple, or golden one, and so on. Even if I’m saying the swan in the pond is gray, I can still use a purple one to disprove a statement that all swans in the pond are white, even if purple is not remotely comparable to gray.