Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

[Antvasima]

I apologize for asking, but who is MikasaMakoto?

From what I vaguely recall, MikotoMisaka is a longterm troll who used to create a lot of sockpuppets to cause problems in our community.

They took their username from this character:

Misaka Mikoto

Misaka Mikoto is a main heroine in Toaru Majutsu no Index and the main protagonist of Toaru Kagaku no Railgun. She is the third-ranked Level 5 esper and the strongest Electromaster in Academy City, nicknamed the Railgun due to her signature move. Kamijou Touma also coined the nickname Biri-Biri...

vsbattles.fandom.com

 

[FinePoint]

Sean is extremely persistent, and claims that he did not do what he is being accused of. My apologies for bringing up this tiresome issue again.

https://community.fandom.com/wiki/Message_Wall:Antvasima?threadId=4400000000003873361#4400000000014891309

"This one might seem like that at first glance, but it's usually not until someone important actually sees what you said and it affects them that you realize how bad what you said really was."

This reads still like they're just sorry they got caught. They don't care about saying horrible things unless someone 'important' gets upset over it?

Not to mention much of this appeal is just arguing with Strym's subjective interpretation of intent, and doesn't actually do anything to mitigate all the trouble and drama they've caused.

 

[Genericstickman]

It would be helpful if you elaborated on that, with evidence, please.

alright I'll list a few that makes me suspicious

• as seen in the Death Battle thread they're highly aggressive and angered when it comes to Superman which is a thing with Mikoto as seen in the past, her off-site accounts, and her most recently confirmed sockpuppet
• they share similar interests in verses as Mikoto such as Dragon Ball, Yu-Gi-Oh, and Fire Emblem
• made a stomp matchup against Itachi just like what Mikoto has done with her previous sock
• one of their first posts on the forums was for Athena vs Bison, a matchup that is one of Mikoto's favorites off-site
• another off-site one but do I really have to say anything here?

either these are unfortunate coincidences for YuseiDragon1 or another Mikoto sockpuppet

 

[Antvasima]

alright I'll list a few that makes me suspicious

• as seen in the Death Battle thread they're highly aggressive and angered when it comes to Superman which is a thing with Mikoto as seen in the past, her off-site accounts, and her most recently confirmed sockpuppet
• they share similar interests in verses as Mikoto such as Dragon Ball, Yu-Gi-Oh, and Fire Emblem
• made a stomp matchup against Itachi just like what Mikoto has done with her previous sock
• one of their first posts on the forums was for Athena vs Bison, a matchup that is one of Mikoto's favorites off-site
• another off-site one but do I really have to say anything here?

either these are unfortunate coincidences for YuseiDragon1 or another Mikoto sockpuppet

@DarkDragonMedeus

You seem to have an extremely good memory. Does this seem to make sense to you?

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

alright I'll list a few that makes me suspicious

• as seen in the Death Battle thread they're highly aggressive and angered when it comes to Superman which is a thing with Mikoto as seen in the past, her off-site accounts, and her most recently confirmed sockpuppet
• they share similar interests in verses as Mikoto such as Dragon Ball, Yu-Gi-Oh, and Fire Emblem
• made a stomp matchup against Itachi just like what Mikoto has done with her previous sock
• one of their first posts on the forums was for Athena vs Bison, a matchup that is one of Mikoto's favorites off-site
• another off-site one but do I really have to say anything here?

either these are unfortunate coincidences for YuseiDragon1 or another Mikoto sockpuppet

Normally, I'd ask for more comments, but I think the last bullet point showing the two copy/paste one to one comments says it all. One even showing her Reddit account where the name VictoriaMikoto231 kind of makes her obvious. Victoria was last I remember the name of her Discord account.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. Thank you for the information. Should we ban YuseiDragon1 then?

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

Okay. Thank you for the information. Should we ban YuseiDragon1 then?

Took care of it on both platforms

 

[Antvasima]

Thank you very much for helping out.

 

[Mr. Bambu]

Hello all.

This post serves as a notification to the wider community that we have taken some effort to enforce a rule that we have failed to enforce recently. Specifically, we are enacting bans for a small number of accounts that have bypassed our slur filter onsite. We have restricted these bans to users who have done so in the past two years by posting variations of the "n" word (specifically one particularly frequently used variation).

In doing so, we wish to point out that we will be more proactive with enforcing these rules in the future. Do not bypass the slur filter. It will result in action being taken.

The following users will be banned for 1 month each for doing so across the past two years:

• @TheOrangeGuy09 (here)
• @PedjaTarzan (here)
• @Richard5128pm (here)
• @Sahlwrld (here)
• @Homie890 (here)
• @AppleLord (here)

Thank you, that is all. I will be enacting these bans shortly.

 

[Antvasima]

Also, I have now added that 3-letter variation of the n word to our slur filter.

 

[Random-Helper323]

For future reference, some people may write those three letters accidentally while intending to type other things, like MHA (M and H are next to N and G respectively on the keyboard). So if someone types it as a typo we should probably not ban them for that.

 

[Antvasima]

Yes, agreed.

 

[StarShooter80]

ILike2drawstuff has vandalised SDBH Goku's profile by removing all of its contents. I have reversed the edits, please handle the user and lock the page

 

[StarShooter80]

Also this is really weird to say

 

[Antvasima]

ILike2drawstuff has vandalised SDBH Goku's profile by removing all of its contents. I have reversed the edits, please handle the user and lock the page

I locked that page and gave a warning message, since it seemed to be an accidental mistake.

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Message_Wall:ILike2drawstuff

 

[Antvasima]

Also this is really weird to say

I told that member to stop saying inappropriate comments

Vegeta vs Aizen

Vegeta does resist this lol ntm kyoka wont affect him cause layers I don’t see a resistance to illusion creation and perception manipulation? KS isn’t listed as mind manipulation.

vsbattles.com

Should we give an official warning as well?

 

[Random-Helper323]

I told that member to stop saying inappropriate comments

Vegeta vs Aizen

Vegeta does resist this lol ntm kyoka wont affect him cause layers I don’t see a resistance to illusion creation and perception manipulation? KS isn’t listed as mind manipulation.

vsbattles.com

Should we give an official warning as well?

Probably not for that alone. It does border on harassment though, so maybe.

Important distinction, is the statement referring to the fictional characters touching each other or to someone touching the forum member? First one is a dirty joke, second is sexual harassment and even a possible threat, albeit obviously a non-serious one.

 

[Antvasima]

@Hecky2222

What do you have to say for yourself?

 

[Hecky2222]

@Hecky2222

What do you have to say for yourself?

My bad. It was a joke to my friend. Won't be repeated

 

[Random-Helper323]

@Hecky2222

What do you have to say for yourself?

In context it seems to be referring to the character. The context is Hecky asked how Aizen stops Vegeta using Hakai, which involves touching him and erasing him. Mbp responded that he uses lifting strength and a spell which involves a long casting, to which Hecky remarked "bro wants to get touched". This seems to refer to Aizen's proposed tactics not being able to stop Vegeta from touching him and using Hakai, thereby erasing him.

This seems to just be a dirty joke, not harassment.

 

[Dark_Soul20189]

Not a full-out report, but can someone teach @Azertyhuuh how versus matches are supposed to be created, and not be Stomp matches?

 

[Reiner04]

Not a full-out report, but can someone teach @Azertyhuuh how versus matches are supposed to be created, and not be Stomp matches?

You'll need to provide some form of context or description so we can understand your request. Also, these kinda stuff just can be handled via PMs or Message Wall of the user in question. If those options aren't available or not beneficial then you can use the APRT or reach out to a staff member directly. The RVT is just a last choice to make such request (hope everyone knows why).

 

[TWILIGHT-OP]

You'll need to provide some form of context or description so we can understand your request. Also, these kinda stuff just can be handled via PMs or Message Wall of the user in question. If those options aren't available or not beneficial then you can use the APRT or reach out to a staff member directly. The RVT is just a last choice to make such request (hope everyone knows why).

I was informed that @Azertyhuuh is making stomp/spite threads.

 

[Mbpoops]

I was informed that @Azertyhuuh is making stomp/spite threads.

I dont believe these are spite threads it genuienly just seems like he was interested in these matchups imo its not intentional

 

[Dark_Soul20189]

You'll need to provide some form of context or description so we can understand your request. Also, these kinda stuff just can be handled via PMs or Message Wall of the user in question. If those options aren't available or not beneficial then you can use the APRT or reach out to a staff member directly. The RVT is just a last choice to make such request (hope everyone knows why).

Just wanted him to actually learn how to do threads properly, since he refuses to listen when someone tries to explain it to him, but sure I will list some.

Comparison between Veldanava (2-A) vs Zamasu at Full Power (Anime) (1-C)

Comparison between Veldanava (2-A) vs Zamasu at Full Power (Anime) (1-C) The fight between them would be of a different kind, where the discussion is only about determining who is stronger or who would win in a direct confrontation. Here we have Veldanava Here we have Infinite Zamasu at his...

vsbattles.com

Created this match while thinking Zamasu should stomp
(I already reported this in part with my last report.

Veldanava vs Zeno

Before we begin, please refrain from any childish behavior and take this topic seriously. Kindly vote with a clear reason, and thank you. Battle: Veldanava (100% of his power) vs Zen’ō (100% of his power) Veldanava profile: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Veldanava_(Light_Novel) Zen’ō...

vsbattles.com

Do I really need to say anything?

The One Above All vs Featherine

The strongest character in the anime world at H1A level vs the strongest character in Marvel at H1A level. The One Above All H1A vs Featherine H1A The fight will be to the death; the win condition is simply killing the opponent, meaning the battle continues until one of them dies. Who do...

vsbattles.com

This says it all

Here is the reason that made me choose The One Above All; simply, he surpasses in everything↓

And now he created this....

Comparison between Daishinkan from Dragon Ball Heroes vs Gilgamesh.

Daishinkan 1C (6D infinite) vs Gilgamesh 1C (8D). The win condition is that one kills the other, meaning a fight to the death; the winner is the one who kills their opponent. Who do you think would win? I will give my opinion here ↓ Honestly, I thought a lot about this matchup in my mind...

vsbattles.com

He created all of these, thinking they were stomping matches, just so his own "character" could win...

 

[Maniaunavailable]

So for the Azert situation

7th expansion fandom asked the verse to NOT BE TOUCHED, until the verse it’s fixed, It’s literally in the general discussion forum. And this has not been a one time thing, he dosnt even ask supporters opinion before making them.

So idk if extreme but i suggest him getting a ban on making versus for like a week at least or a warning but this would be like the 5th one

 

[Reiner04]

I don't believe a ban or warning is necessary yet. Since the user is new, they likely don't understand our rules regarding of a 'stomp matches' or that creating them is prohibited.

Looking at their text:

Here is the reason that made me choose The One Above All; simply, he surpasses in everything↓

it seems they are just trying to validate their beliefs through Vs matches. They might realize it’s one sided but are looking for external opinions to confirm it or atleast wants to prove it, somehow. Providing clear instructions on our match making rules should be sufficient for now.

@Azertyhuuh You have been reported for creating stomp matches. Please be aware that creating a 'stomp'/'spite' match is strictly prohibited here. These matches are closed because they don't allow for actual debate. Please familiarize yourself with our VS Match rules before creating your next match.

->Read here for further clarifications.

 

[SweetDao]

it seems they are just trying to validate their beliefs through Vs matches. They might realize it’s one sided but are looking for external opinions to confirm it or atleast wants to prove it, somehow. Providing clear instructions on our match making rules should be sufficient for now.

You should perhaps tell them that if they want to do a VS match without any "restriction", they can do so in the Fun and Games section. I feel like it would suit them better (for now, at least).

 

[Reiner04]

You should perhaps tell them that if they want to do a VS match without any "restriction", they can do so in the Fun and Games section. I feel like it would suit them better (for now, at least).

Yeah. @Azertyhuuh this too, although make sure they aren't spite regardless as we don't want bad blood between members of different communities. Although if there is certain match u are genuinly curious about (due to certain verse specific stuff or smth), even if its a stomp, you can create in Fun and Games.

 

[Azertyhuuh]

This is the first time I report someone and I respectfully ask the staff to block them from my account.

This person @Dark_Soul20189 has been bothering me for weeks, and this person holds a grudge and hates me, and this is something no one here can understand unless they experience it. It may seem to you as if they are reporting me, advising me, and so on, but this person is trying to cause problems and is interfering in my personal matters, and their only goal is to report me. I don’t know why they hold such resentment toward me, but I simply ask for them to be blocked from my account because from today I cannot deal with them anymore, especially after they said this ↓

Here is the thing. What he is saying is not helpful... This was already commented by Staff and Reported to RvT... Hell, his last message was removed.

I asked Antvasima for permission only to comment on a staff thread and contribute to it, and they came and inserted themselves between us as usual, and this is the last day and from this moment I cannot deal with them. They lied to Antvasima and told him that what I say is not useful, which is first of all disrespectful toward me even if I were inexperienced, why would you say that to me? Then they said that staff commented on it and reported me, which is also a lie. In reality, Reiner gave me permission to comment on the thread and I commented once, but I didn’t know I had to ask for permission again to comment another time, so I replied and commented without permission, then Reiner reported it and said it was not an official warning because I didn’t know, and that comment was deleted because I commented without permission, not because it was useless. I cannot get along with this person and I never did anything to them they hold resentment, grudge, and hatred toward me, and I am the only one who can say this, and I tell everyone there are members here who know that. I don’t know if anyone will come and tell the truth without fear or bias, but everyone has seen this, especially in the comparison I made about Featherine and The One Above All you can see how the members themselves know this and admit that some members try to do this to me intentionally.

 

[Dark_Soul20189]

Alright... I wasn't planning to do this, but you kinda forced my hand...

This was your message on Ant's wall.

Please, could you allow me to comment now on the thread related to my HDE, since it concerns me and I’m the one who proposed it with one of the moderators, and I would like to contribute to the discussion.

Ant Specificly gave you permission to comment on a thread

You can make a few posts there if what you will say there is geniuly helpful and relevent. (Insert hand emoji)

You can't copy messages in replies on message walls aprantly...

What you said was neither relevant nor helpful... In fact, you were already rejected by @Planck69

Yeah, no. We are not by default giving away Low Outerversal range to all abstractions of Type 1 concepts. The scope of "reality" is not a fixed one across fiction.

So yeah, to me it seems like you baited Ant into giving permission to comment in a staff thread, with something that had already been rejected.

 

[Azertyhuuh]

Alright... I wasn't planning to do this, but you kinda forced my hand...

This was your message on Ant's wall.


Ant Specificly gave you permission to comment on a thread

You can't copy messages in replies on message walls aprantly...

What you said was neither relevant nor helpful... In fact, you were already rejected by @Planck69


So yeah, to me it seems like you baited Ant into giving permission to comment in a staff thread, with something that had already been rejected.

Rejected? I am discussing the topic, and it’s called a staff discussion thread, not a staff member. I have the right to reply to them and clarify the matter maybe other staff will agree with it. One staff member not agreeing does not mean my words are useless. If the opinion of one staff member were enough for such discussions, it wouldn’t be called a staff discussion in the first place. Even in this discussion you find staff who disagree with each other, and if we follow your logic, that would mean any topic rejected by one staff member gets closed without considering the opinions of the rest. Even topics themselves have staff who agree and others who disagree, and Antvasima himself in every comment mentions the staff and tries as much as possible to get the largest number of approvals and be sure.

You are now trying to justify your behavior toward me with statements that are not correct in themselves, and also what exactly is your problem with me? Should I give you my address and let you live with me? It seems the idea of blocking you from my account for peace and no problems didn’t please you, isn’t that so?

 

[Reiner04]

This is the first time I report someone and I respectfully ask the staff to block them from my account.

This person @Dark_Soul20189 has been bothering me for weeks, and this person holds a grudge and hates me, and this is something no one here can understand unless they experience it. It may seem to you as if they are reporting me, advising me, and so on, but this person is trying to cause problems and is interfering in my personal matters, and their only goal is to report me. I don’t know why they hold such resentment toward me, but I simply ask for them to be blocked from my account because from today I cannot deal with them anymore, especially after they said this ↓



I asked Antvasima for permission only to comment on a staff thread and contribute to it, and they came and inserted themselves between us as usual, and this is the last day and from this moment I cannot deal with them. They lied to Antvasima and told him that what I say is not useful, which is first of all disrespectful toward me even if I were inexperienced, why would you say that to me? Then they said that staff commented on it and reported me, which is also a lie. In reality, Reiner gave me permission to comment on the thread and I commented once, but I didn’t know I had to ask for permission again to comment another time, so I replied and commented without permission, then Reiner reported it and said it was not an official warning because I didn’t know, and that comment was deleted because I commented without permission, not because it was useless. I cannot get along with this person and I never did anything to them they hold resentment, grudge, and hatred toward me, and I am the only one who can say this, and I tell everyone there are members here who know that. I don’t know if anyone will come and tell the truth without fear or bias, but everyone has seen this, especially in the comparison I made about Featherine and The One Above All you can see how the members themselves know this and admit that some members try to do this to me intentionally.

While I partially understand your frustration, it isn't a rule violation for a user to report activities they find concerning. Even if 1/2 of those instances weren't strictly 'report-worthy' there were understandable reasons behind the reports and, people can be wrong at times. Regarding your request, a one-way block isn't particularly beneficial. You would be unable to see their comments, but they could still see and reply to yours. This is only efficient if both (you and @Dark_Soul20189 ) agree mutually to it. However, if you are aware of these limitations/downsides and still wish to proceed, I don't mind your request.

Also, To clarify, I didn’t delete your message because it was useless or anything, but because it was a staff only thread where permission is required to comment. While I don't personally agree with your points and believe they go beyond the intended scope of the thread, I will agree that they are intertwined with the topic (atleast from your perspective and you are staying true to your intentions of helping out). And as Bambu once noted, staff don't really limit the scope of a user’s response once they are permitted to speak, so your current posts are fine to stay.

 

[SweetDao]

While I don't personally agree with your points and believe they go beyond the intended scope of the thread, I will agree that they are intertwined with the topic

Saying that "they go beyond the intended scope of the thread" is an understatement. At that point, he's having a parallel debate that has nothing to do with it. If anything, that would be more beneficial for him and staff members who wish to examine what he has to offer, to simply permit him to create another, separate staff thread, to upgrade Concepts, and such.

 

[Azertyhuuh]

While I partially understand your frustration, it isn't a rule violation for a user to report activities they find concerning. Even if 1/2 of those instances weren't strictly 'report-worthy' there were understandable reasons behind the reports and, people can be wrong at times. Regarding your request, a one-way block isn't particularly beneficial. You would be unable to see their comments, but they could still see and reply to yours. This is only efficient if both (you and @Dark_Soul20189 ) agree mutually to it. However, if you are aware of these limitations/downsides and still wish to proceed, I don't mind your request.

Also, To clarify, I didn’t delete your message because it was useless or anything, but because it was a staff only thread where permission is required to comment. While I don't personally agree with your points and believe they go beyond the intended scope of the thread, I will agree that they are intertwined with the topic (atleast from your perspective and you are staying true to your intentions of helping out). And as Bambu once noted, staff don't really limit the scope of a user’s response once they are permitted to speak, so your current posts are fine to stay.

Yes, I understand. I just want the block to be mutual. It wouldn’t be useful if it’s only from my side. A member has the right to request blocking someone who disrespects and annoys them, and it should be applied to both sides to solve the problem. I don’t think I will ever come to an understanding with him, so a mutual block is necessary, because this isn’t something I can forgive at all, especially after the things he said and the way he inserted himself and told Antvasima. There’s nothing I hate more than someone trying to belittle me in front of others and make me look like a fool or stupid through lies and spite, and this isn’t the first time. I cannot forgive him or come to an understanding with him at all, because I personally know this type of people outside the forum — if you don’t block them, their problems and resentment will follow you for years, and that’s something I’ve experienced and know.

 

[Reiner04]

Saying that "they go beyond the intended scope of the thread" is an understatement. At that point, he's having a parallel debate that has nothing to do with it. If anything, that would be more beneficial for him and staff members who wish to examine what he has to offer, to simply permit him to create another, separate staff thread, to upgrade Concepts, and such.

I agree, at that point, creating a separate thread is more beneficial than proposing things in a thread with a much more limited and simpler scope. Although it’s fine for a user to offer their perspective on the nature of concepts, especially if they have permission and are acting in good faith, they should make sure their comments do not go beyond the essential scope of the thread. Which is not "tiering" or "range" but merely whether they should have HDE or not. Also, as good practice, I think staffs should always review a user's draft before giving them the green light to post in a staff thread. This will allow us to guide the user in streamlining their post, ensuring it only contains elements essential to the topic at hand and do not go beyond it.

Yes, I understand. I just want the block to be mutual. It wouldn’t be useful if it’s only from my side. A member has the right to request blocking someone who disrespects and annoys them, and it should be applied to both sides to solve the problem. I don’t think I will ever come to an understanding with him, so a mutual block is necessary, because this isn’t something I can forgive at all, especially after the things he said and the way he inserted himself and told Antvasima. There’s nothing I hate more than someone trying to belittle me in front of others and make me look like a fool or stupid through lies and spite, and this isn’t the first time. I cannot forgive him or come to an understanding with him at all, because I personally know this type of people outside the forum — if you don’t block them, their problems and resentment will follow you for years, and that’s something I’ve experienced and know.

Mutual block can only be granted if both users agree, afaik.

 

[Azertyhuuh]

If he is being disrespectful and resentful toward me and so on, then it won’t be necessary to obtain his approval for this matter.

@Dark_Soul20189 I think you should state your agreement here to a mutual block between us, because I will not come to an understanding with you anymore, and we will not reach any solution or peace no matter what you say or do. So we can exchange blocks, and that way you won’t be bothered by me, and you won’t have to tire yourself reporting and monitoring me from place to place. Trust me, you’ll feel much more at ease, and each of us can go their own way starting from this moment.

 

[AlexSamDen]

If he is being disrespectful and resentful toward me and so on, then it won’t be necessary to obtain his approval for this matter.

I'm kind of obliged to say this...

You haven't provided any definite evidence to conclude him "being disrespectful and resentful" towards you yet

So if there is any, I would like you to clearly present it

 

[Azertyhuuh]

I'm kind of obliged to say this...

You haven't provided any definite evidence to conclude him "being disrespectful and resentful" towards you yet

So if there is any, I would like you to clearly present it

He follows me from place to place and waits for an opportunity to report me, showing his resentment, intent, and attempts to deliberately annoy me and interfere in my affairs. On top of that, he tries to portray me as a bad and stupid person. He has previously reported me many times for trivial reasons, and they were rejected by the staff, especially one report that all the staff opposed to the point that he told them not to blame Reiner because it was his fault. He showed his resentment there, and from that moment I started losing my patience with this person. Today he tried to present me in a bad image, lied, and showed disrespect. The thing I hate most and cannot forgive is when someone interferes in a matter that does not concern them and tries to ruin your reputation in front of someone else to make you look like a fool through lies. That alone is enough reason for me to request a mutual block between us, and if this seems normal to you, it is not normal to me, and I will never forgive it no matter what because I know this type of person.

This matter is between me and him, so please do not interfere between us. He can simply agree to a mutual block between us and end this issue completely; otherwise, this counts as further proof of hesitation about it, meaning he wants to keep bothering me more and more. Otherwise, he would simply agree. If he is hesitant now, it means he still wants to continue his actions toward me. If he truly hated me and reports me every day and doesn’t like me, he would have agreed easily and we would end this matter. You can consider this hesitation as additional evidence supporting what I said. Have you asked why he does not want a mutual block with me? Why am I the one repeating the request for a mutual block while he ignores and does not agree? If I were the wrongdoer or at fault, I wouldn’t be the one asking for a block. The one who refuses despite the problems is the one in the wrong who wants to keep bothering you. Simply agreeing would end everything; otherwise, he is proving more and more that he still wants to keep harassing me and dragging me further into his problems.

 

[AlexSamDen]

He follows me from place to place and waits for an opportunity to report me, showing his resentment, intent, and attempts to deliberately annoy me and interfere in my affairs. On top of that, he tries to portray me as a bad and stupid person. He has previously reported me many times for trivial reasons, and they were rejected by the staff, especially one report that all the staff opposed to the point that he told them not to blame Reiner because it was his fault. He showed his resentment there, and from that moment I started losing my patience with this person. Today he tried to present me in a bad image, lied, and showed disrespect. The thing I hate most and cannot forgive is when someone interferes in a matter that does not concern them and tries to ruin your reputation in front of someone else to make you look like a fool through lies. That alone is enough reason for me to request a mutual block between us, and if this seems normal to you, it is not normal to me, and I will never forgive it no matter what because I know this type of person.

I would like for those to be supported with links and quotes. Otherwise this is not a legitimate explanation by standards of the site

This matter is between me and him, so please do not interfere between us.

I am trying to act as a third party to lessen the tension between the 2 of you for this not to develop to open hostility

He can simply agree to a mutual block between us and end this issue completely; otherwise, this counts as further proof of hesitation about it, meaning he wants to keep bothering me more and more. Otherwise, he would simply agree. If he is hesitant now, it means he still wants to continue his actions toward me. If he truly hated me and reports me every day and doesn’t like me, he would have agreed easily and we would end this matter. You can consider this hesitation as additional evidence supporting what I said. Have you asked why he does not want a mutual block with me? Why am I the one repeating the request for a mutual block while he ignores and does not agree? If I were the wrongdoer or at fault, I wouldn’t be the one asking for a block. The one who refuses despite the problems is the one in the wrong who wants to keep bothering you. Simply agreeing would end everything; otherwise, he is proving more and more that he still wants to keep harassing me and dragging me further into his problems.

1) You have just contradicted yourself, but I'll dismiss it as a typo

2) Your conclusion of his motives, while is a possible reason in a vacuum, isn't necessarily true
There can be a multitude of reasons why a person doesn't want to issue a mutual block, such as:
a) General unwillingness to block people, so as to not accidentally miss a useful argument from them
b) Insufficient motives for blocking in their perspective

etc


That said, you should not focus on this part of the matter, as it remains entirely speculative. You should present direct reasoning for your request, supported by quotes and links and let others be the judges of the situation