ok while i admit that was a mistake on my part, dosent change the fact slap has several ways in order to stun travis. Also this has to be some manner of association fallacy.
I've already explaied what he would do...
ok ignore the 2 pages ago, it still was yesterday
No, one stun dosenjt work against him using association fallacy and being very generous (gods hand time stop), stun would still work as well as brick trap etc
because they want to fight to be over quickly, most people they fight in game do look like average people but yet are on their level so i dont see why this is any differnet. We can use this same logic for travis too, why would he use time dilation and immedeatly mega blitz the average block guy
no, i dont like it when my points are continously straw manned with the same fallacies and hypocritical arguments
I'm not going to dignify this with a proper response.
Welcome to arguing with reaper, son.
alright man
even then why were you arguing for him still winning????
What is with people yapping about fallicies they don't know about...
once again ESP, IA, ANPR, Time dialation
Again, lifting strength
You mean the same points just reworded or being countered by your fellow Roblox aficionado?
you never brough up lifting strength till now stop backtracking. I was still arguing for him because the half baked consensus was that travis would mega blitz and one shot and i said IF we went by that logic that would be stomping. That is literally what you are doing though, youre saying because travis can moved in reverse time he can moved in stopped time despite stopped time being a completley different medium. I also dont see how lifting stregth would help with para inducment. he dosent even have to try and hit him in time stop bob would just walk over to him and absorb him (or float)
no, i mean the same points that have been consistently dodged or countered by arguments that dont make sense, bye
He isn't blitzing and one shotting he's just skill clowning
Both of them are time manipulation abilities that prevent the victim from moving forward so idk if thats even accurate
You brought up TK and traps...not para inducement
Bob can't catch him
That was in refference to travises telekeniss, not the plaeyrs stgun. One prevents moving by rewinding one prevents by stopping, totally differnt. And either way gods hand is the best stun in the game so i dont see why he would use it. Bob wouldnt have to catch him hed get time stopped diffed
''its not blitzing its skill diff''. Also want to brought up you said slap dies before he does anything, defenition of blitz
it is quit literally going to go like this
Time manip is resisted by Travis. Legit established in like the first or second page when the keys got changed.
resistance toone type of time manip is not justification for every sort of time manip. Being able to walk normally in a world where time is being rewinded is not the same as being able to move when time is stopped. Association fallacy
Im not arguing both at the same time im doing a hypothetical. Travis supporters won because hes faster, more combat experienced, stronger, and could blitz slap before he could do anything. WHile i disagree with that, im just saying that if a travis supporter wants to add it because of the reasons why he won thats not gonnna work because you cant just say travis stomps and then decide to add it despite it being a stomp
and im not making it up they literally said thats how it would end
Not trying to ping you reaper jut using u as an example
And while he does have a chance of winning that chance has been disregarded, insulted and strawmanned with half baked reasoning. Still haven't seen a single clip of Travis using his time hax and blitzing someone in character instead of using just his beam sword
on the page these are described as conditions for a decisive win, not a stomp? or is that what you're describing
Well shit. But either way wouldn't one character being able to instantly kill another before he even gets the chance to do anything a stomp. If it's not then this just feels like a really cheap win
