HakutoRei000
He/Him- 1,265
- 317
- Thread starter
- #41
What can i do about this, there's that if it mean universe.Though i remember @Planck69 said something about having irl universe reference like Earth and Solar System could mean a solid universe
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What can i do about this, there's that if it mean universe.Though i remember @Planck69 said something about having irl universe reference like Earth and Solar System could mean a solid universe
It is proof of tier 4 at least; but not immediately 3-A.What about the earth, stars, solar system, they can prove a universe no?.
What about possibly Low 2-C that Viet agree? At least i can take that i guessIt is proof of tier 4 at least; but not immediately 3-A.
The big ol' issue is that a lot of the statements that would support low 2-C, seem to be immediately downscaled upon further reading.What about possibly Low 2-C that Viet agree? At least i can take that i guess
Here's another Iruna.The big ol' issue is that a lot of the statements that would support low 2-C, seem to be immediately downscaled upon further reading.
Like for example:
"She was from another world, that world has different time and they work by their own nature." - Could mean she's from a different timeline if you only consider the middle scan but then immediately she basically describes her world as a neighboring planet.
I had said that if there's reasonable evidence of a space-time being an analogue of our own then, barring any contradictions, it would be fine to automatically take it as Low 2-C.I don't think these scans help either, they are mostly talking about power rather than the size of the world, having limitless power to sustains the world doesn't equate it into the world is limitless in size
Anyway there are Earth reference here so imo it is solidify my vote toward a possibly/likely Low 2-C rating. Though i remember @Planck69 said something about having irl universe reference like Earth and Solar System could mean a solid universe
Alright, thank you, bro, for the clarificationI had said that if there's reasonable evidence of a space-time being an analogue of our own then, barring any contradictions, it would be fine to automatically take it as Low 2-C.
Note that this only really applies to near mirrors of our own universe i.e. the Harry Potter universe can be reasonably assumed to be the same size as our own universe, no real reason for it to be arbitrarily different/smaller.
This one seems to be far too radically different in both nature and scope, so it would need direct proof, and so far, it just seems to be At least 4-A, possibly Low 2-C at best.
Well there's that At least 4-A, possibly Low 2-C can i apply it then? (Not to character just Cosmology).Alright, thank you, bro, for the clarification
No, at least from the look of it, only me and Planck agreed with At least 4-A, Possibly Low 2-C. SomebodyData voted with different rating. So you at least need one more vote similar to me and Planck to applies the threadBumping, the thread is concluded with At least 4-A, Possibly Low 2-C.
Can someone close this thread?.
Thank you, i want to close this asap there's like 350 scans for better crt next.No, at least from the look of it, only me and Planck agreed with At least 4-A, Possibly Low 2-C. SomebodyData voted with different rating. So you at least need one more vote similar to me and Planck to applies the thread
@DarkDragonMedeus @Random-Helper323 @TWILIGHT-OP
Sorry for the ping but but your help is appreciated
Possibly?, or just 2-2 vote.4-A seems reasonable from what I can see.
Not sure there's much reason for Low 2-C.
Well, the problem now is just the size of the "world" of Iruna, albeit many is indeed a universe, for the time most of the "world" has their own time and space just like dammerung.4-A for the starry skies.
I'm sorry, I have to remain neutral on Low 2-C, until evidence tells us how its time flow works. To scale to it would require influencing that time too.
From what i see, this is for the cosmology only4-A for the starry skies.
I'm sorry, I have to remain neutral on Low 2-C, until evidence tells us how its time flow works. To scale to it would require influencing that time too.
Actually, according to the rule, if this cosmology can affect character rating, then you need to list who and what will be affectedAlso for scaling it will be done in another crt.
I mean the scaling is complex enough to be explained here, but there's currently only me who is active for this verse that run from 2008 until now so, i mean yes i will.From what i see, this is for the cosmology only
Actually, according to the rule, if this cosmology can affect character rating, then you need to list who and what will be affected
Alright, is there confirmation that the parallel worlds have their own separate time flow? Clearly the world has a flow of time, which would normally net it a Low 2-C rating. Keep in mind scaling to it would require affecting all of time, so it's weird trying to apply this to a cosmology without any mention of feats.
Keep in mind multiple space-time continuums would be 2-C.![]()
![]()
For context Navida is a world that will always in Christmas time. Navida is the source of christmas because other worlds has different time when Christmas, they deliver prize to all of the worlds.
Ahh sooo...Keep in mind multiple space-time continuums would be 2-C.
So 3-1 can i apply it? (For the Cosmology only...for now).