• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

(8-2-0) Another 10 years old takes on the llama god | Undertale vs Pokémon

Welp... idk how to answer that lol.

Regardless, if Arceus manages to get rid of Frisk through different hax (though I doubt it'd use CM 1 to perma-kill a child), the Player who is outside the Avatar's Range could use the True Reset to basically restore everything in the cosmology on a Type 2 Info level, which would be something beyond the Avatar's paygrade as it lacks the ability itself, and we treat Info 2 and CM 1/2 as uninteractable, meaning that Arceus' Concept Hax won't be a valid counter.
hang on a minute the metaphysical aspects page says that no individual aspect can effect the other normally

I don't think the info manip can be used to restore frisks concept
Yeah but Frisk's own feelings aren't controlled by Player directly, they've still been scared enough to slow down in the True Lab for example, and they can't control their own DT level as otherwise the entire Omega Flowey fight wouldn't exist.
That is a good point

in that case idk what I was yapping about with gold as gold then
 
hang on a minute the metaphysical aspects page says that no individual aspect can effect the other normally

I don't think the info manip can be used to restore frisks concept
I thought it was obvious, but would Arceus even use that against a really determined child?
 
I thought it was obvious, but would Arceus even use that against a really determined child?
Not immeditely anyway

they're more likely to use this once the player gets involved but at that point they would probably get info EE'd which is why i'm voting for frisk

That said if Arceus DID choose to use CM1 beforehand then the player shouldn't be able to restore frisk from that
 
their more likely to use this once the player gets involved but at that point they would probably get info EE'd which is why i'm voting for frisk
Tbh I don't even think Arceus would know about the Player (at least not right away, it's a 1-A entity still), but True Reset is still a valid BFR option.
Does the cm1 erasure affect every point in the timeline? If not the player can just turn back time
The CM1 in question involves the very concept of time (Dialga), so...
 
Regardless, based on what @Bobsican said, all the votes based on SI would be invalidated, so...
Frisk fra
Anyway, frisk wins because of stupid SI. Arceus while trying to win will still be willing to listen to a child (hell he listens to most pokemon protag) and frisk can choose to just go the peaceful route instead.
Oh, if that's the case...then I'll vote Frisk too.
Frisk FRA
Frisk FRA
Anyone wanting to recheck the new args?
 
Can it affect a HYPERtime tho smug face
Abstract things like Concepts or Information are no longer tied to dimensionality iirc. This is why arguments like "5D resistance which overrides any layer of the 4D version of the hax" are not a thing anymore.
 
Abstract things like Concepts or Information are no longer tied to dimensionality iirc. This is why arguments like "5D resistance which overrides any layer of the 4D version of the hax" are not a thing anymore.
This is news to me, do you recall something to cite that policy?
 
Also what i tried to say wasn't 5d time hax gg but that the player would just bring Frisk from different point of the hypertimelime after Frisk was erased kinda like how the Save system can manipulate the time of timeline that has already been erased,any way this doesn't matter since i was joking lol
Abstract things like Concepts or Information are no longer tied to dimensionality iirc. This is why arguments like "5D resistance which overrides any layer of the 4D version of the hax" are not a thing anymore.
 
yo rq why does the wiki still site stuff like this in the hax section?

  • "The main advantage of an ability being considered "smurf" in power / potency is that it is assumed to be capable of overpowering all resistances that have not shown to be even close to the same level of power. This in practice means that a three dimensional character with a Low Complex Multiveral ability should be capable of overpowering the baseline resistance of a three dimensional character with only Universal+ levels of resistance."
Low 1-C smurf hax can still work on a uni+ character even if both are baseline...dosen't that mean smurf hax is still a thing?
 
This is news to me, do you recall something to cite that policy?
Nah they probably just forgot to edit the changes
They did lmao. You should ask to @Agnaa directly (in his DMs) if you can change that, as he's the one who brought that up.
 
Regardless, based on what @Bobsican said, all the votes based on SI would be invalidated, so...





Anyone wanting to recheck the new args?
Well, I think I'll stick with my vote. I mean, Arceus is resistant to Frisk's SI aura, but from the beginning it seemed like Frisk could win with their charm, even without the bonus aura, so I'm sticking with my vote for the same reason.
 
Nah they probably just forgot to edit the changes

They did lmao. You should ask to @Agnaa directly (in his DMs) if you can change that, as he's the one who brought that up.
No, it's up to date.
Edit: The Resistance page needs some more clarifying edits, though. Although, for the most part, it still represents the core idea accurately.
 
Last edited:
I assume determination is considered higher dimensional because otherwise can't arceus willpower drain to counter it. Also even if the avatar is erased by information why would that prevent the recreation wouldn't that be like sending it back to the computer through a second computer?
 
I need clarification, why are the SI based votes invalidated again?
Magic Bounce would make SI-based moves like Parting Short, Confide and Play Nice bounce back at the user, basically making ACTs null.
Hol'up so what is Frisk's new wincon?
Info
Info2 erasure which Arceus doesn't resist i guess
TRUE RESET, actually. That would act as a BFR that Arceus cannot oppose given it lacks Info 2.
 
Since Frisk doesn't use True Reset from the get go and nor does Arceus use his required wincons to beat Frisk, guess this can be an incon match.
 
Since Frisk doesn't use True Reset from the get go and nor does Arceus use his required wincons to beat Frisk, guess this can be an incon match.
The thing is the Player using it from outside Arceus' range tho.

Counted still.
 
It still needs to be done through Frisk regardless of whether or not the Player can do a true reset.
Except that isn't true? Nowhere it was said that Frisk is necessary to use it, heck the contrary actually, the Player can use the power at the end of the Pacifist Route where Frisk is basically disconnected from us at that point.
 
Except that isn't true? Nowhere it was said that Frisk is necessary to use it, heck the contrary actually, the Player can use the power at the end of the Pacifist Route where Frisk is basically disconnected from us at that point.
I meant it's Frisk controlled through the Player fighting Arceus. Not the Player themselves fighting Arceus. It's essentially like an Avatar fighting an Avatar.
 
I meant it's Frisk controlled through the Player fighting Arceus. Not the Player themselves fighting Arceus. It's essentially like an Avatar fighting an Avatar.
This is also true, though there's still the fact that Frisk is still basically our Avatar as you said, meaning they do what we want them to do.

Though counted anyways.
 
Since Frisk doesn't use True Reset from the get go and nor does Arceus use his required wincons to beat Frisk, guess this can be an incon match.
The player is controlling frisk,Frisk has barely any self will in undertale it just depends on what the player does and thats where it gets hard to answer what he will do
 
Thinking about it the player did use the true reset at the end of the true pacifist even tho flowey was begging him not to do it,we might be evil💔
 
it just depends on what the player does and thats where it gets hard to answer what he will do
It's funny to read this, when Player is literally us.
Thinking about it the player did use the true reset at the end of the true pacifist even tho flowey was begging him not to do it,we might be evil💔
If we consider us using TRUE RESET as canon, genocide route should be considered canon too. Imo best way to characterize Player is as someone who wants entertainment, and would do everything possible.

Disregarding things above: most likely scenario:
1. Player and Frisk would try to ACT and SPARE first.
2. Seeing that ACTs fail due to Arceus abilities, Frisk does what they did previously when ACTs failed and try to attack Arceus(see Asgore and Toriel).
3. Due to stat diffs, Avatar dies immediately. I don't know how much time exactly doe sit requires for avatar to reappear. But if it's fast enough to be combat applicable, Player prolly TRUE RESET at this point, preferring this instead of trying to fight enemy with resurrection
 
Disregarding things above: most likely scenario:
1. Player and Frisk would try to ACT and SPARE first.
2. Seeing that ACTs fail due to Arceus abilities, Frisk does what they did previously when ACTs failed and try to attack Arceus(see Asgore and Toriel).
3. Due to stat diffs, Avatar dies immediately. I don't know how much time exactly doe sit requires for avatar to reappear. But if it's fast enough to be combat applicable, Player prolly TRUE RESET at this point, preferring this instead of trying to fight enemy with resurrection
Do I take it as a vote for Frisk?
 
Seeing that ACTs fail due to Arceus abilities, Frisk does what they did previously when ACTs failed and try to attack Arceus(see Asgore and Toriel).
Wouldn't the fight start with arceus 4 kilometers away and likely flying. How does Frisk reach?
I don't know how much time exactly doe sit requires for avatar to reappear. But if it's fast enough to be combat applicable, Player prolly TRUE RESET at this point, preferring this instead of trying to fight enemy with resurrection
Arceus would likely not be mentally effected due to sharing a not mind with the heart/original spirit and having type 4 acausality
 
Back
Top