- 5,779
- 2,362
Prove it.That's not really questionable or even wrong.
One alleged error does not invalidate an entire source, So no, the hymns are not "questionable" just because one character or one part is debated.
This is like "I don’t like where this comes from, so it must be unreliable." which is ridiculous.
No? Again, that context about Nibelung isn't about he wants to marry any woman.
That is exactly how that works. Sahl if you published a book and it had an inaccuracy, anyone reading it would take everything else with a grain of salt.
Don’t put words in my mouth. That reads like ‘I can’t counter your argument so I’ll strawman’
Sahl that is literally what the book says. If you say this is just flowery language then that can be applied to several sections of the book and still supports my point that you shouldn’t take the book as a 100% correct source because several things about it are just metaphorical and flowery language so they may not be saying what the book says.