Why do you quote the FAQ? i know it, but FAQ again is just another broad guideline to follow; specific verse still need evaluation
This is only true for the progressive flow of time model, where time regulates three dimensions of space to create a continuous flow and creates three distinct regions called the past, present, and future; that's why it is called the space-time continuum, referring to its continuity. Literally following up after the part you quoted is
The FAQ doesn't follow the Eternalist universe, where time is just another extension of space to create a four-dimensional block, where past, present and future exists all at once and are equally real; thus, no past or future exists, only the present, since past also exist and future also exist and are real at the same time. Thus, there is no past and future, because the idea of past and the future is that past is thing that already happened, the future is what potentially going to happen
Unless the verse didn't follow this model, like what you claimed in the previous post, so you are contradicting yourself
The idea of uncountable infinite snapshots applies only to the linear progressive flow of time model, where time is a distinct dimension that regulates space, thus time making a continuous line where all its points contain a snapshot of 3D space. We applied what we called set theory and the continuum hypothesis. Idk how we can applies this to Eternalist (Block) Universe, where time progression is just an illusion, there is no past or future and every snapshot exist at once and is the same present
Again, the term "timeline" only apply to linear progressive flow of time, the usual model, or building block universe
This is just that due to the involvement of time, simply locate something in 3-dimensional coordinate is not good; they need to add time to search
Anyway, from what i see, especially the part about the Sacred Sakura where it is stated to be always here, it seems like the verse follows Eternalism, but the texts Voidneither show us seem like the verse actually follows Presentism. Presentism will never be Low 2-C
So unless someone shred more light on what cosmology of Genshi is supposed to follow, I disagree with this thread, for now
It tooks me 3 hours for this evaluation lol, i really did an extensive research on eternalism just for this thread, time to rest