• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

All Purpose Dragon Ball Thread

lmao dragon ball forced a standards change again

And this one was shameless too
1956be8189df1ad023f5d07bddcb296b.jpg
 
im sorry what
but if the standard is wrong then its simply wrong. This is not the right way to go abut it. Chariot is the one who helped out with DB stuff many many times and If it wasn't for him this beautiful stellar db CRT probably wouldn't have gotten accepted

ppl acting like this has all got something to do with dragon ball when that's not true at all in this case.

I'll give you an example when something like this actually happened. Someone proposed immeasurable lifting strength DB then this happened


but the dura neg thread? no
I didn't say anything about Chariot. I'm alluding to the idea that this standard was present for 10+ years and then got changed. I'm questioning how the hell it was never changed when it was brought up in CRTs for other verses, apparently, and only got a response after all this time when a Dragon Ball thread was made. If anything it's a criticism of how the website is managed.

If I thought Chariot was genuinely wrong I'd be arguing it right now. I'll admit I do have my reservations about it but it's not really an issue and I understand the logic behind the change. I just don't like that it took until a DB CRT was made about it for that issue to be raised.
 
I am trying to fuel a personal agenda for 1A wov are there any scans or arguments that I could use ? Like r>F 👀 at least it isn't infinite in size for H3A
 
69LJXsW.jpeg

They'll say it was just coincidence, as always.
I didn't say anything about Chariot. I'm alluding to the idea that this standard was present for 10+ years and then got changed. I'm questioning how the hell it was never changed when it was brought up in CRTs for other verses, apparently, and only got a response after all this time when a Dragon Ball thread was made. If anything it's a criticism of how the website is managed.

If I thought Chariot was genuinely wrong I'd be arguing it right now. I'll admit I do have my reservations about it but it's not really an issue and I understand the logic behind the change. I just don't like that it took until a DB CRT was made about it for that issue to be raised.
 
I am trying to fuel a personal agenda for 1A wov are there any scans or arguments that I could use ? Like r>F 👀 at least it isn't infinite in size for H3A
There is absolutely nothing stating the WoV is R>F. And in games cosmology we see the WoV is encompassed by the timeline. The only thing you can use to argue 1-A WoV is that it lacks space and time. However I do not believe simply lacking space and time is sufficient for any scaling, it would have to be something existing beyond those concepts.

Additionally I believe there are other issues involving treating the WoV like it's 1-A. For example entering a 1-A realm without special means, particularly without the aid of a 1-A entity, is considered evidence against it to my recollection. Now you could argue the Grand Priest is 1-A so the WoV could be 1-A as he appears to be the one who transports everyone to the WoV (At least in the manga, I forget the anime's scene) but this also raises its issues with how 1-A entities interact with non 1-A beings. In particular, there is no real reason the Grand Priest would be qualitatively superior to his kids...so you would assert all Angels are 1-A. Which comes with its own brand of issues with how all these Angels interact with the Mortal Realm and don't really appear to be using something like Darkseid's avatars (Well...there is an argument for it but not one for them having a metaphysical true form.)

To clarify I'm definitely not a Tier 1 expert, let alone 1-A expert, but I'm fairly certain most of the things I just outlined would make it basically impossible to argue the WoV is a 1-A structure.

Factually speaking Dragon Ball doesn't, to my recollection, have any genuine, really solid, qualitative superiority arguments. The closest thing is meme stuff like God Fusion Goku fusing with the audience or maybe the Charisma Mission stuff? The most I could ever see Dragon Ball being is Low 1-A.
 
lmao dragon ball forced a standards change again

And this one was shameless too
Garou lost his durability negation for the same reason (it was based on attacking organs) {and they tried to give it to him more than once}.
It was already wrong to give durability negation before because of that.
 
1-A is just too strict for Dragon Ball to get, and most verses in general (Rightfully so).
DDM once said that Arale actually can be 1-A and her feats are enough for being 1-A

He said "Arale is very suitable for 1-A, but it doesn't make sense for a character to be "varies up to 1-A with plot manipulation"
 
I am trying to fuel a personal agenda for 1A wov are there any scans or arguments that I could use ? Like r>F 👀 at least it isn't infinite in size for H3A
Even if by a miracle you could find a fitting argument to say that WoV is 1-A, the fact that Goku and Jiren could affect it without the help of another 1-A being would completely invalidate it. So don't think hard about it
 
Quick question.

Destroying an Infinite Universe in a unquantificable amount of time, would also require Infinite speed and AP?

Like for example, eventually flying from planet to Planet, galaxy to Galaxy, one shotting all sorts of celestial bodies during eons?
 
Quick question.

Destroying an Infinite Universe in a unquantificable amount of time, would also require Infinite speed and AP?

Like for example, eventually flying from planet to Planet, galaxy to Galaxy, one shotting all sorts of celestial bodies during eons?
Believe so yeah? You can't really destroy something infinite in a finite amount of time without an infinite something in return.

I don't know if you really need infinite speed AND AP to do that. Finite power with infinite speed may technically work as would Infinite power with finite speed.
 
Quick question.

Destroying an Infinite Universe in a unquantificable amount of time, would also require Infinite speed and AP?

Like for example, eventually flying from planet to Planet, galaxy to Galaxy, one shotting all sorts of celestial bodies during eons?
I think so, I think destroying an infinite Universe and if it's DB everything is geared towards speed and other attributes.

I'm pretty sure that the planets in DB are not infinite in "size" and the same can be said for galaxies, which have an infinite number of galaxies, but their size is finite I think.
 
Believe so yeah? You can't really destroy something infinite in a finite amount of time without an infinite something in return.

I don't know if you really need infinite speed AND AP to do that. Finite power with infinite speed may technically work as would Infinite power with finite speed.
I think that consequentely, you would need Infinite amounts of never ending power/energy reserves to fully complete the task of destroying an Infinite Universe besides speed?
 
Btw, guys... isn't it surprising how Sparking Zero died so quickly.

People be saying "Oh, it's gonna feed generations", "This Game will sink Xenoverse 2 into the dust"

But eh, Xenoverse 2 is still standing, it's the new DB online.

No new game was able to dethrone Xenoverse, not even Budokai Tenkaichi 4
 
Last edited:
Btw, guys... isn't it surprising how Sparking Zero died so quicly.

People be saying "Oh, it's gonna feed generations", "This Game will sink Xenoverse 2 into the dust"

But eh, Xenoverse 2 is still standing, it's the new DB online.

No new game was able to dethrone Xenoverse, not even Budokai Tenkaichi 4
Dragon ball sparking zero changed the tenkaichi franchise too much, I played the story mode and I found it very uninteresting, I didn't really like the parallel story, every action you take changes the story in a different direction, don't know for those who played it seemed a little uninteresting and I also had a hard time choosing characters to fight against CPU, because in the past it was much easier to choose a character to play, but it's an average game, it's kind of cool the characters and stuff, but it looks like a DLC from other DB games 😂😂
 
Man a lot of game profiles are missing abilities and statistics lol. Like Shallot and Android 21 should have a plethora of abilities
 
Btw, guys... isn't it surprising how Sparking Zero died so quickly.

People be saying "Oh, it's gonna feed generations", "This Game will sink Xenoverse 2 into the dust"

But eh, Xenoverse 2 is still standing, it's the new DB online.

No new game was able to dethrone Xenoverse, not even Budokai Tenkaichi 4
I played BT3 a lot leading up to SZ's release and SZ honestly just lacked the sauce. I have heard the game apparently got some good changes that made it more like BT3 but I just don't feel the urge to get back into it when I know everyone is just going to use the same tiny selection of characters.

Anyone who claimed SZ would 'dethrone' Xenoverse was delusional beyond measure. Xenoverse is a like always online sort of MMO where you have loads of character creation options, can customise existing characters, can experiment with various builds, raids, PVP, co-op, etc. As well as an original story. I think people may have been expecting SZ to be something like '3D DBFZ' where it would end up at Evo and be hyper-competitive but...no. It just doesn't have the polish and diversity that DBFZ has and fumbled the ball on release.

That's not to say SZ is a bad game, it just lacks the sort of competitiveness of DBFZ or content of XV2. And if you wanted to replay the story of DB why not just play Kakarot?
 
Back
Top