Verezen
He/Him- 67
- 61
- Thread starter
- #81
Perhaps I am misunderstanding what you are saying, but I do not believe the laws affecting each other would be an anti feat against type 1, which allows explicitly for other concepts of that nature to affect them.Essentially, what I'm getting from this is that the Absolute Laws predate Existence, have always existed, and the world came after them, which is characteristic of Type 1 Concepts.
However, the issue is that Type 1 Concepts are supposed to exist independently of what they govern. But in this case, the Gods are the Absolute Laws, and they’re also bound by each other’s conceptual nature, meaning that these Absolute Laws govern one another. That falls more in line with Type 2, where concepts are still abstract but interdependent of what they govern and capable of influencing or affecting one another.
So, yeah, I agree with Type 2 Concepts.
Also the laws are not the gods, they were created by them and exist even after the Gods died. Also the Gods are not the particulars which are governed by these concepts, the concepts of space, time, and death would be the particulars and the laws exist independently of those things, especially because they existed before them. I don’t see how it can be argued that the laws are interdependent on reality when they have outlived their creators (who are also the beings responsible for creating reality) and the laws predate the reality they govern.1. Independent Universal Concepts: Such concepts are completely independent from the part of reality they govern, except maybe of other concepts of this nature.