- 115
- 37
Let's take it one step at a time.when was it even mentioned that it takes same imaginary energy for emanator to beat one? in the fight we werent even using imaginary energy we were just jumping sunday till our power matched his and beat him what the?
1)I didn't say it would take the same power as an emanator to beat him, I said it would take the same power to counter it.
2)The sunday emanator was the one who set up ena's dream, Acheron then cuts off ena's dream, everyone wakes up, and Sunday is apparently debuffed by it.
well its not just emanator of destruction, theres literal calc of emanator of erudition herta having galaxy lvl+ feat
3) That's right, Herta has a feat creating galaxies that is calculated as galaxy+.
But again "creating", not destroying.
What I propose is that what for destruction Emanators is AP/DC, for the rest of Emanators of other Paths should be translated only as range(AoE), or resistance (in case in the future there will be some feat).
4) Precisely, that partly agrees with me.Emanators are still scalable with acheorn statement, fact that lygus and herta clash is evidenty shown to be "mutual self destruction" which is like worst outcome of the fight, and herta stating that 3 emanator level or higher having destructive power bigger than chadwick bombs which include destruction of 24 planets with the space between them. I dont see why scaling them to each other in same tier is an issue, sure Lord Ravagers are stronger than the rest but that doesnt mean we should put them whole 30 tiers below them at all.
Let's suppose that three Emanators face each other, one of Erudition, one of hunting, and one of beauty.
The mention of herta proposes that the combined damage between the three would be greater than Chadwick's bomb, in contrast, a single emanator of destruction can destroy galaxies.
5)I partly understand what you are saying, all Emanators are on the same level. They have the same amount of imaginary energy.
That's why above I propose that what for those of destruction is AP or DC, for the rest is at least Area of Effect.